In advance of Pres. Obama's meeting with the pope tomorrow, E.J.
Dionne Jr., the Washington Post's resident Catholicism
obfuscator,
chimes in with a look at the encyclical released earlier this
week, Caritas in Veritate. The column features too many
half-truths, cherry-picked anecdotes, and misrepresentations to
bother addressing them all, but there is one worthwhile takeaway.
Dionne crows that "right-wing" Catholics will be surprised to
find that the Vatican views Obama through a "broader prism" than
just the abortion issue, and that in fact their meeting comes
"just three days after the release of a papal encyclical on
social justice that places the pope well to Obama's left on
economics."
OK, it is good to know, straight from one of the most vocal
liberal U.S. Catholics, that Benedict is more liberal than our
president. I assume this means that in the future we won't hear
complainst about Benedict's
reactionary or
unbending conservative extremism.
The pope is obviously not "more liberal" than people who are
pro-choice.
I think what's interesting is that the pope is reemphasizing (not
that it's not always there) the commitment of the Church to
social justice.
While the Church is decidedly not inclined to Marxism or
socialism, the last pope having offered a stern and compelling
rebuke to these philosophies, it is also not a wing of the
Republican party, out pleading for corporate interests and
bombing Arabs.
The Church continues to advance a culture of life around the
world, of course, but the pope makes it clear that working on
behalf of the poor is a central aspect of the Church's mission.
Included in that mission are in fact support ideas usually
associated in America with the Democratic party, such as a
support of organized labor.
It seems we are ALL capable of supermarket Catholicism.
Kelpius| 7.9.09 @ 12:30PM
Dionne the Catholicism obfuscator and Washington media
mediocrity, honored by the smart set with one of those mysterious
lifetime "wise man" certificates (see also David Gergen). On and
on he goes, his mind a warehouse of bumper sticker slogans,
reshuffled for column after whining column in that tiresome,
womanish style. Makes him a nice living and a "fellow" at some
name-brand think tank.
Angel| 7.9.09 @ 2:01PM
The Pope supports infanticide? First I've heard that little
nugget.
Kingsmill| 7.9.09 @ 2:13PM
It's absurd to fling around "liberal" or "conservative" in
regards to Catholic social doctrine. It matters nothing if the
Pope is personally liberal or conservative on this or that issue.
The important matter is whether he explicates Catholic doctrine
or not-and he does. Prudential matters of economics, concerning
rates of taxation or structure of a welfare system or monetarism
vs Keynesianism are left to the laity working within the world.
Roman Catholics must inform their consciences with sound Catholic
doctrine and work within the world.
JP| 7.9.09 @ 4:35PM
Liberal Reader,
I think you should first read Caritas in Veritate before you make
general announcements. The same should hold true for pundits like
Dionne. Believe it or not, Pope BXVI again stress the Right to
Life supercedes all other rights (including the rights to profits
and comfortable living).
This is the 3rd Encyclical of Pope BXVI. In each of them he uses
the Latin word Caritas. In Catholic Theology, Caritas always
refers to God's Love. The word charity derives from it, and
unfortunately, the English translation for Caritas is love. But
Caritas is something far different from any kind of love that
humans fell or contain in themselves. Truth in God's Love refers
to the devine love God has for all humans, his children. Christ
commanded us to love eachother as God loves us, is a direct
reference to Caritas. But as Pope BXVI rightfully stated, that
kind of love cannot be found in Eros, nor in humans in general.
It is not felt nor can it be deduced from human reason. Christ
died because he loved us. That love transcended human emotions
and thought. To say that BXVI puts social justice before abortion
is absurd in the context of Caritas. God does not favor abortion
in any means, and without life there can be no fullfillment of
Caritas in the human realm.
What the Pope has done is to turn economics away from the
material. Yes, that includes both Adam Smith and Karl Marx;
Socialism and Capitalism. There is no social or political realm
for Caritas; but there is an inward mystical one. The Pope's
ideas predate the Modern. It is a call for inward absorbtion of
God's grace through obedience, prayer, and striving to fullfill
what Protestants sometimes call The Great Commission. The Pope's
vision is an ancient one, and would therefore be considered
conservative.
Things like the redistribution of wealth; complex financial
dealings that only benefit institutional investors; speculation
of the sort that made Soros a billionaire; or extreme defecit
spending are mainly modern ailments. The encouragement of illegal
immigration for political reasons as well as short term financial
reasons rob the native worker of his vocation and his wage.
Catholic social teaching doesn't require that we feed the poor
while robbing the working poor.
There's a lot to think about.
Liberal Reader| 7.9.09 @ 4:45PM
JP --
Fair enough, although I'm not sure if you thought I was claiming
the pope is now an advocate of illegal immigration.
Caritas might be understood by comparing it to its opposite,
cupiditas, often associated with lust and greed.
At any rate, the pope seems to be reaffirming the Church's
support of political and social policies that redress human
suffering and increase conditions in which people can flourish.
The pope is not an advocate of quietism or resignation in the
face of poverty and injustice. I think that's pretty clear.
You're right, though. I have not read the encyclical and am
relying on what I hear in mass and what I read elsewhere.
I still think many "conservative" Catholics have come to believe
that because the Republican party is right on abortion, they're
right on everything, which is of course nonsense.
Now I'm not saying the Republican party is evil. I'm only saying
its the Moloch-worshiping spawn of Satan.
But that's just me, and I'm not the pope. Clearly I have a way to
go in my own learning about the faith, but I'm not convinced I'm
alone.
KIngsmill| 7.9.09 @ 8:34PM
The free market economist who came closest to laying an economic
framework closest to Catholic social thought was Wilhelm Ropke,
an architect of the post war German economic recovery . His "The
Humane Economy" and "The Social Crisis of our Time" should be
read by all conservatives.
Liberal Reader| 7.9.09 @ 11:42AM
The pope is obviously not "more liberal" than people who are pro-choice.
I think what's interesting is that the pope is reemphasizing (not that it's not always there) the commitment of the Church to social justice.
While the Church is decidedly not inclined to Marxism or socialism, the last pope having offered a stern and compelling rebuke to these philosophies, it is also not a wing of the Republican party, out pleading for corporate interests and bombing Arabs.
The Church continues to advance a culture of life around the world, of course, but the pope makes it clear that working on behalf of the poor is a central aspect of the Church's mission. Included in that mission are in fact support ideas usually associated in America with the Democratic party, such as a support of organized labor.
It seems we are ALL capable of supermarket Catholicism.
Kelpius| 7.9.09 @ 12:30PM
Dionne the Catholicism obfuscator and Washington media mediocrity, honored by the smart set with one of those mysterious lifetime "wise man" certificates (see also David Gergen). On and on he goes, his mind a warehouse of bumper sticker slogans, reshuffled for column after whining column in that tiresome, womanish style. Makes him a nice living and a "fellow" at some name-brand think tank.
Angel| 7.9.09 @ 2:01PM
The Pope supports infanticide? First I've heard that little nugget.
Kingsmill| 7.9.09 @ 2:13PM
It's absurd to fling around "liberal" or "conservative" in regards to Catholic social doctrine. It matters nothing if the Pope is personally liberal or conservative on this or that issue. The important matter is whether he explicates Catholic doctrine or not-and he does. Prudential matters of economics, concerning rates of taxation or structure of a welfare system or monetarism vs Keynesianism are left to the laity working within the world. Roman Catholics must inform their consciences with sound Catholic doctrine and work within the world.
JP| 7.9.09 @ 4:35PM
Liberal Reader,
I think you should first read Caritas in Veritate before you make general announcements. The same should hold true for pundits like Dionne. Believe it or not, Pope BXVI again stress the Right to Life supercedes all other rights (including the rights to profits and comfortable living).
This is the 3rd Encyclical of Pope BXVI. In each of them he uses the Latin word Caritas. In Catholic Theology, Caritas always refers to God's Love. The word charity derives from it, and unfortunately, the English translation for Caritas is love. But Caritas is something far different from any kind of love that humans fell or contain in themselves. Truth in God's Love refers to the devine love God has for all humans, his children. Christ commanded us to love eachother as God loves us, is a direct reference to Caritas. But as Pope BXVI rightfully stated, that kind of love cannot be found in Eros, nor in humans in general. It is not felt nor can it be deduced from human reason. Christ died because he loved us. That love transcended human emotions and thought. To say that BXVI puts social justice before abortion is absurd in the context of Caritas. God does not favor abortion in any means, and without life there can be no fullfillment of Caritas in the human realm.
What the Pope has done is to turn economics away from the material. Yes, that includes both Adam Smith and Karl Marx; Socialism and Capitalism. There is no social or political realm for Caritas; but there is an inward mystical one. The Pope's ideas predate the Modern. It is a call for inward absorbtion of God's grace through obedience, prayer, and striving to fullfill what Protestants sometimes call The Great Commission. The Pope's vision is an ancient one, and would therefore be considered conservative.
Things like the redistribution of wealth; complex financial dealings that only benefit institutional investors; speculation of the sort that made Soros a billionaire; or extreme defecit spending are mainly modern ailments. The encouragement of illegal immigration for political reasons as well as short term financial reasons rob the native worker of his vocation and his wage. Catholic social teaching doesn't require that we feed the poor while robbing the working poor.
There's a lot to think about.
Liberal Reader| 7.9.09 @ 4:45PM
JP --
Fair enough, although I'm not sure if you thought I was claiming the pope is now an advocate of illegal immigration.
Caritas might be understood by comparing it to its opposite, cupiditas, often associated with lust and greed.
At any rate, the pope seems to be reaffirming the Church's support of political and social policies that redress human suffering and increase conditions in which people can flourish.
The pope is not an advocate of quietism or resignation in the face of poverty and injustice. I think that's pretty clear. You're right, though. I have not read the encyclical and am relying on what I hear in mass and what I read elsewhere.
I still think many "conservative" Catholics have come to believe that because the Republican party is right on abortion, they're right on everything, which is of course nonsense.
Now I'm not saying the Republican party is evil. I'm only saying its the Moloch-worshiping spawn of Satan.
But that's just me, and I'm not the pope. Clearly I have a way to go in my own learning about the faith, but I'm not convinced I'm alone.
KIngsmill| 7.9.09 @ 8:34PM
The free market economist who came closest to laying an economic framework closest to Catholic social thought was Wilhelm Ropke, an architect of the post war German economic recovery . His "The Humane Economy" and "The Social Crisis of our Time" should be read by all conservatives.