The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

The worst thing Sonia Sotomayor said was not the bit about a wise Latina would make better decisions than a white male, but WHY she says wise Latinas have better judgment. See today's Washington Times editorial. And what was that about the "facts" she might "choose to see?"

View all comments (7) | Leave a comment

Tim| 7.8.09 @ 1:16PM

MR. Hillyer you need to tweak that link sir:

An Error Was Encountered
The URI you submitted has disallowed characters.

Quin| 7.8.09 @ 1:25PM

Thanks for the heads-up. I think I have it fixed now.

Tim| 7.8.09 @ 1:36PM

"In the Berkeley speech, a 2003 speech at Seton Hall University and a 2002 address at Princeton University, Judge Sotomayor said this: "Whether born from experience or inherent physiological or cultural differences, a possibility I abhor less or discount less than my colleague [federal district] Judge [Miriam] Cedarbaum, our gender and national origins may and will make a difference in our judging."

I almost wish you hadn't fixed it. We're screwed.

GOP Senator| 7.8.09 @ 1:40PM

just don't call her a racist, it makes us look bad.

Liberal Reader| 7.8.09 @ 3:28PM

Does that fact that Clarence Thomas and Sam Alito both claimed that there ethnic backgrounds enabled them to make sound decisions on issues dealing with race make absolutely no difference to you people?

Sounds to me like a double standard.

Tim| 7.8.09 @ 3:35PM

That is not the issue. Sotomayor would have us believe that her decisions-in all instances- would not be merely "sound" but superior (to those of a white male).

Michael Dooley| 7.9.09 @ 8:04AM

Clarence Thomas and Sam Alito were making personal references to their own individual and familial experiences and backgrounds--testifying before Senate committees. Everyone at one time or another has had to blow this kind of sunshine during a job interview. Judge Sotomayor undoubtedly has been there many times herself. Sotomayor, however, went beyond biography and made a blanket statement comparing one race to another. No matter how you slice it, she made a misstep.

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by Quin Hillyer

http://spectator.org/blog/2009/07/08/inherent-physiological-differe

ADVERTISEMENT

The Spectacle Blog

Gallup: Veterans Prefer Romney

W. James Antle, III | 5.28.12

Markos Moulitsas is Scum

Quin Hillyer | 5.28.12

Weekend Political Wrap-Up, Memorial Day Edition

W. James Antle, III | 5.27.12

An Honor Flight Story

TAS Staff | 5.26.12

WaPost Criticizes Romney's Lack of Rhythm

Aaron Goldstein | 5.25.12

Tom Coburn on the Debt 'Disease'

Vivien Chang | 5.25.12

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

Follow Me

Jay D. Homnick | 5.25.12

How About the Record of DOE Capital?

William Tucker | 5.25.12

The Great Debate

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.24.12

Markos Moulitsas is Scum

Quin Hillyer | 5.28.12

ADVERTISEMENT