-
The “Good Arguments” of the Islamists?
August 4, 2009 | 5 comments
-
Honduran Archbishop Blasts Zelaya and Chavez
July 16, 2009 | 14 comments
-
Obama: Working with the Pope to Help the World?
July 9, 2009 | 10 comments
Much of the blogosphere is presently up in arms about Al Gore comparing the “battle against climate change” to that against Hitler and Nazi Germany. But in fact Gore’s remarks are not particularly novel. Only one month ago, none other than French President Nicolas Sarkozy made precisely the same comparison during the ceremonies marking the 65th anniversary of the Normandy invasion. Indeed, Sarkozy even added that the battle against “a capitalism of speculators and rentiers” was yet another similar struggle. Here is the relevant passage from Sarkozy’s speech as translated from the official French transcript:
All those who fought against Nazism and Fascism dreamt of building a better world in which right would replace force.
We know that there is still a long way to go.
But we also know what a united Europe and an America that is faithful to its values can accomplish together. The great totalitarianisms of the 20th Century have been defeated. The threats that today weigh upon the future of humanity are of a different nature. But they are no less serious.
What will become of the world if global warming deprives hundreds of millions of men, women, and children of water and food? If a capitalism of speculators and rentiers destroys the jobs of millions of people? If extreme poverty drives a part of humanity to desperation? What would become of the world if, as a result of a cowardly withdrawal [from the fight], the world’s democracies would give free rein to terrorism and fanaticism? If they refused to defend human rights and the rights of nations?
It must be said that Sarkozy’s list is highly inclusive and it is notable that the war on terror and (if only implicitly) Islamic extremism at least made the grade. It is also notable, however, that the latter only figures in fourth place — behind the ostensible struggles against global warming and capitalism!
Moreover, Sarkozy’s choice of comparisons is not the only historically dubious aspect of his speech. His suggestion that a “united Europe” somehow contributed to the defeat of “the great totalitarianisms of the 20th Century” — hence, presumably including National Socialism — is an even more obvious howler.
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?
Sebastian Stark| 7.9.09 @ 11:39AM
This is shortsighted. Sarko like everybody knows that europeans are far more concerned with the former points, and, I guess out of pure pragmatism, presented the problems in this order to get everybodies attention. And as politicians have to make the choices(not the commentators), most of them know that the environmental and the world trade crisis are problems of higher order then terrorism, because further problems in this area can create growing possibilities for terrorism while growing terrorism cant create more economic or ecologicals problems, besides being a problem for the uprisi9ng of functional economic structures within areas concerned with terrorism, but still. Think first