The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
The Largest Selection of Liberal-baiting Merchandise on the Net!
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email

AmSpecBlog

The Obama Administration's War on Science

The Bush administration is at it again.  It is suppressing scientific views that run contrary to the administration's line.

NO, WAIT!  It's the Obama administration that is conducting a war on science.  It appears that the EPA has suppressed a report solely because it contradicted the president's belief in imminent catastrophe due to global warming.

Reports Declan McCullagh for CBS News:

The Environmental Protection Agency may have suppressed an internal report that was skeptical of claims about global warming, including whether carbon dioxide must be strictly regulated by the federal government, according to a series of newly disclosed e-mail messages. 

Less than two weeks before the agency formally submitted its pro-regulation recommendation to the White House, an EPA center director quashed a 98-page report that warned against making hasty "decisions based on a scientific hypothesis that does not appear to explain most of the available data."

Not only was the researcher's report not forwarded.  He was told to stop working on climate change and to instead update the agency's grants database.

This is all so confusing.  I thought we were living in the era of change, of openness, of liberalism and tolerance!

Comments

Liberal Reader| 6.30.09 @ 2:28PM

Spare me.

Pete| 6.30.09 @ 3:22PM

Mr. McCullagh had better get his resume out there...you don't work for a mainstream mouthpiece and even come close to exposing the real "inconvenient truth."

Mike | 6.30.09 @ 3:29PM

Any effort to quash a dissenting opinion or minority report is troubling. Having read the entire McCullagh report, it appears that minority opinions were considered, some included in the final report and others rejected. The preponderance of solid scientific opinion supports the hypothesis about global warming. Is there dissent? Yes. The difference between the Bush administration and the Obama administration is that the preponderance of scientific opinion was rejected in favor of the minority opinion during Bush's administration. The opposite is true now. Even so, how research is conduct and policy crafted matters.

Mike | 6.30.09 @ 3:30PM

Any effort to quash a dissenting opinion or minority report is troubling. Having read the entire McCullagh report, it appears that minority opinions were considered, some included in the final report and others rejected. The preponderance of solid scientific opinion supports the hypothesis about global warming. Is there dissent? Yes. The difference between the Bush administration and the Obama administration is that the preponderance of scientific opinion was rejected in favor of the minority opinion during Bush's administration. The opposite is true now. Even so, how research is conduct and policy crafted matters.

Alan Brooks| 6.30.09 @ 4:47PM

let's ask the Derb to do a piece here. He isn't averse to doing an article for AS, is he?

Leave a Comment

ADVERTISEMENT

Are you in a mob?

The Democrats say Obamacare opponents are a mob. Are they right?

         

Participating in this survey will subscribe you to the American Spectator email newsletter. You may unsubscribe at any time.

The Elite Search for Non-Meaning at Fort Hood

Robert Stacy McCain

* * * *

Members to Watch

Philip Klein

* * * *

The 39 Democrats Who Voted "No"

Philip Klein

* * * *

Pelosi's Pyrrhic Victory?

Philip Klein

* * * *

Pro-Life Amendment Passes Easily

Philip Klein

* * * *

One Step Forward, Two Races Back

George Neumayr

* * * *

Divisive Unanimity

Daniel J. Flynn

* * * *

Joe Wilson, Call Your Office

Larry Thornberry

* * * *

ACORN's Big Spender

Matthew Vadum

* * * *

The Spirit of 1989

Doug Bandow

* * * *

The Somali-Kenya Connection

George H. Wittman

* * * *

Tex Mess

William Murchison

* * * *

Feeding the Beast

Philip Klein

* * * *
ADVERTISEMENT