The Bush administration is at it again. It is suppressing
scientific views that run contrary to the administration's line.
NO, WAIT! It's the Obama administration that is conducting
a war on science. It appears that the EPA has suppressed a
report solely because it contradicted the president's belief in
imminent catastrophe due to global warming.
The Environmental Protection Agency may have suppressed an
internal report that was skeptical of claims about global
warming, including whether carbon dioxide must be strictly
regulated by the federal government, according to a series of
newly disclosed e-mail messages.
Less than two weeks before the agency
formally submitted its pro-regulation recommendation
to the White House, an EPA center director quashed
a 98-page report that warned against making hasty
"decisions based on a scientific hypothesis that does not
appear to explain most of the available data."
Not only was the researcher's report not forwarded. He was
told to stop working on climate change and to instead update the
agency's grants database.
This is all so confusing. I thought we were living in the
era of change, of openness, of liberalism and tolerance!
Mr. McCullagh had better get his resume out there...you don't
work for a mainstream mouthpiece and even come close to exposing
the real "inconvenient truth."
Mike | 6.30.09 @ 3:29PM
Any effort to quash a dissenting opinion or minority report is
troubling. Having read the entire McCullagh report, it appears
that minority opinions were considered, some included in the
final report and others rejected. The preponderance of solid
scientific opinion supports the hypothesis about global warming.
Is there dissent? Yes. The difference between the Bush
administration and the Obama administration is that the
preponderance of scientific opinion was rejected in favor of the
minority opinion during Bush's administration. The opposite is
true now. Even so, how research is conduct and policy crafted
matters.
Mike | 6.30.09 @ 3:30PM
Any effort to quash a dissenting opinion or minority report is
troubling. Having read the entire McCullagh report, it appears
that minority opinions were considered, some included in the
final report and others rejected. The preponderance of solid
scientific opinion supports the hypothesis about global warming.
Is there dissent? Yes. The difference between the Bush
administration and the Obama administration is that the
preponderance of scientific opinion was rejected in favor of the
minority opinion during Bush's administration. The opposite is
true now. Even so, how research is conduct and policy crafted
matters.
Alan Brooks| 6.30.09 @ 4:47PM
let's ask the Derb to do a piece here. He isn't averse to doing
an article for AS, is he?
Liberal Reader| 6.30.09 @ 2:28PM
Spare me.
Pete| 6.30.09 @ 3:22PM
Mr. McCullagh had better get his resume out there...you don't work for a mainstream mouthpiece and even come close to exposing the real "inconvenient truth."
Mike | 6.30.09 @ 3:29PM
Any effort to quash a dissenting opinion or minority report is troubling. Having read the entire McCullagh report, it appears that minority opinions were considered, some included in the final report and others rejected. The preponderance of solid scientific opinion supports the hypothesis about global warming. Is there dissent? Yes. The difference between the Bush administration and the Obama administration is that the preponderance of scientific opinion was rejected in favor of the minority opinion during Bush's administration. The opposite is true now. Even so, how research is conduct and policy crafted matters.
Mike | 6.30.09 @ 3:30PM
Any effort to quash a dissenting opinion or minority report is troubling. Having read the entire McCullagh report, it appears that minority opinions were considered, some included in the final report and others rejected. The preponderance of solid scientific opinion supports the hypothesis about global warming. Is there dissent? Yes. The difference between the Bush administration and the Obama administration is that the preponderance of scientific opinion was rejected in favor of the minority opinion during Bush's administration. The opposite is true now. Even so, how research is conduct and policy crafted matters.
Alan Brooks| 6.30.09 @ 4:47PM
let's ask the Derb to do a piece here. He isn't averse to doing an article for AS, is he?