-
The Origins of Romneycare and Coultercare
February 9, 2012 | 14 comments
-
Rick Santorum Pulls the Trifecta
February 8, 2012 | 8 comments
-
Mark Levin on Clint Eastwood
February 7, 2012 | 5 comments
-
Ninth Circuit Court Panel Rules Proposition 8 Unconstitutional
February 7, 2012 | 79 comments
-
Obama Flip-Flops on Super PACs
February 7, 2012 | 1 comment




johnnysquares| 6.26.09 @ 6:32PM
He needs to read for about 20 more hours.
johnnysquares| 6.26.09 @ 6:32PM
He needs to read for about 20 more hours.
MattSwartz| 6.27.09 @ 12:32PM
Did Boehner cost the GOP the win with his stupid grandstanding?
Maybe.
I watched it all afternoon. His reading the bill was a publicity stunt to make the same point that Dan Barton (R-TX and debate leader) had made earlier in the debate: that the Dems were playing fast and loose with the amendment process and being un-transparent.
So Barton makes that point, makes it well, nearly drives the Parliamentarian to distraction, and finishes up. Wouldn't that be a good time for Boehner to make a stirring speech about his philosophical objections to the bill?
Well, maybe it would have, but instead he just read random sections from the amendment, inserted snarky comments that never rose to the standard of a cogent critique, and wasted the time of members who were trying to get home.
If Mike Pence were the Minority leader, this wouldn't have happened. What irritates me most is that Boehner didn't seem to have a real problem with the bill. A better legislator would have talked about corporate interests in the bill and unintended consequences for the group. Boehner said nothing new about either.
jody| 1.12.10 @ 4:23AM
He's pretty animatadidas outleted. Of course, members are more likely to let themselves be influenced by pork consideradidas shoes outletations like this: