As a senator, Barack Obama denounced the Bush administration
for holding "secret energy meetings" with oil executives at the
White House. But last week public-interest groups were dismayed
when his own administration rejected a Freedom of Information
Act request for Secret Service logs showing the identities of
coal executives who had visited the White House to discuss
Obama's "clean coal" policies. One reason: the disclosure of
such records might impinge on privileged "presidential
communications." The refusal, approved by White House counsel
Greg Craig's office, is the latest in a series of cases in
which Obama officials have opted against public disclosure.
Since Obama pledged on his first day in office to usher in a
"new era" of openness, "nothing has changed," says David
-Sobel, a lawyer who litigates FOIA cases. "For a president who
said he was going to bring unprecedented transparency to
government, you would certainly expect more than the recycling
of old Bush secrecy policies."
The hard line appears to be no accident. After Obama's
much-publicized Jan. 21 "transparency" memo, administration
lawyers crafted a key directive implementing the new policy
that contained a major loophole, according to FOIA experts. The
directive, signed by Attorney General Eric Holder, instructed
federal agencies to adopt a "presumption" of disclosure for
FOIA requests. This reversal of Bush policy was intended to
restore a standard set by President Clinton's attorney general,
Janet Reno. But in a little-noticed passage, the Holder memo
also said the new standard applies "if practicable" for cases
involving "pending litigation." Dan Metcalfe, the former
longtime chief of FOIA policy at Justice, says the passage and
other "lawyerly hedges" means the Holder memo is now
"astonishingly weaker" than the Reno policy. (The visitor-log
request falls in this category because of a pending Bush-era
lawsuit for such records.)
From detention of suspected terrorists to public disclosure, this
administration's slogan appears to have become:
"Never mind." What's the next promise likely to be
discarded?
Call me conspiratorial, BUT:
has it occured to you that it is NOT the coal-industry execs
visiting the White House that barry-boy wants to keep hidden
behind those black-tinted limo windows?
If only he was inviting OPPONENTS into the WH to negotiate with
them! That is his way, after all!
No, Sir! What barry-boy doesn't want made public is the names of
the SUPPORTERS he's inviting into the WH to sup with him off fine
china!
I refer of course to the UNHOLY TRINITY of Ayers, Wright, and
Khalidi! THAT'S the list barry-boy wants kept out of the public
ken!
elixelx| 6.24.09 @ 11:52AM
Call me conspiratorial, BUT:
has it occured to you that it is NOT the coal-industry execs visiting the White House that barry-boy wants to keep hidden behind those black-tinted limo windows?
If only he was inviting OPPONENTS into the WH to negotiate with them! That is his way, after all!
No, Sir! What barry-boy doesn't want made public is the names of the SUPPORTERS he's inviting into the WH to sup with him off fine china!
I refer of course to the UNHOLY TRINITY of Ayers, Wright, and Khalidi! THAT'S the list barry-boy wants kept out of the public ken!