The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

During today’s press conference President Obama used a popular taunt to defend the inclusion of a government-run health care plan.

“If private insurers say that the marketplace provides the best quality health care, if they’re telling us that they’re offering a good deal, then why is it that the government, which they say can’t run anything, suddenly is going to drive them out of business?” Obama asked rhetorically. “That’s not logical.”

This more or less amounts to him saying, “What are you, chicken?”

The problem is that it wouldn’t be a fair fight. Not when government is making the rules, regulating the insurers, and running the exchange on which the plans will “compete.”

“I think that there is a legitimate concern, if the public plan was simply eating off the taxpayer trough, that it would be hard for private insurers to compete,” Obama acknowledged. But he dismissed this concern, saying that it was just a matter of how the public plan is structured. But that’s just a trademark Obama tactic – to say he’s sympathetic to very real concerns of his political opponents, and then pretend that their concerns can be easily resolved, even though he doesn’t offer any details of how that would be possible.

The whole point of a government plan is that it will be so big and powerful that it can use its bargaining power to negotiate cheaper prices for medical care. This is a good thing, say its proponents. The problem is, the ultimate cost of providing care doesn’t fall – it just gets shifted onto those who have private insurance or pay out of pocket. This already happens with Medicare and Medicaid, representing a cost shift of almost $90 billion a year, according to one estimate by Milliman Inc.

And even if proponents of the government plan claim that it won’t have access to general revenues, nobody who is being intellectually honest would argue that if the plan is losing money, the federal government will allow it to fail without pumping more taxpayer dollars into it. When that day comes, conservatives can make all the arguments they want about how Democrats promised the government plan wouldn’t have access to taxpayer funds, and the only response will be that if we don’t bail out the government plan, tens of millions of Americans will lose their health insurance.

View all comments (7) |

ds80| 6.23.09 @ 7:14PM

This is standard procedure for The One Who Stands On Shaky Ground (and knows it): throw up a straw man.

The same government that forced Bank Of America's merger with Merrill Lynch will just be a wee innocent bystander???

Missy| 6.23.09 @ 8:17PM

We all know WHO the real chicken is here.

Roy | 6.24.09 @ 1:01AM

If any liberal comes anywhere near even thinking about dreaming about implying that it won't be bailed out the response should be a short sharp "Horse crap". There really is no need to pretend that after the past year that statement can be made in good faith.

Pingback| 6.24.09 @ 12:41PM

Obama Asks Questions That Have Very Obvious Answers - Dan_McLaughlin’s blog - RedSta links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…the competition is dead and buried. Profit-making private entities don’t actually act like that very often, for obvious reasons: but governments can and do, at the taxpayer’s expense. As Phil Klein notes, one of the main arguments by supporters of the government plan is that it will use its vast size to obtain cost savings at the expense of health care providers (doctors, hospitals, drug companies,…

Pingback| 6.24.09 @ 12:41PM

Obama Asks Questions That Have Very Obvious Answers - Dan_McLaughlin’s blog - RedSta links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…the competition is dead and buried. Profit-making private entities don’t actually act like that very often, for obvious reasons: but governments can and do, at the taxpayer’s expense. As Phil Klein notes, one of the main arguments by supporters of the government plan is that it will use its vast size to obtain cost savings at the expense of health care providers (doctors, hospitals, drug companies,…

Pingback| 6.24.09 @ 2:19PM

Obama Asks Questions That Have Very Obvious Answers | Social Debate: Barack and Ameri links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…the competition is dead and buried. Profit-making private entities don’t actually act like that very often, for obvious reasons: but governments can and do, at the taxpayer’s expense. As Phil Klein notes, one of the main arguments by supporters of the government plan is that it will use its vast size to obtain cost savings at the expense of health care providers (doctors, hospitals, drug companies,…

Tim| 6.24.09 @ 11:44PM

Phil,

Who's side are you on? I think the insurance companies just need to learn to live with less profit. They've been taking advantage of us for years. Party's over.

More Blog Posts by Philip Klein

http://spectator.org/blog/2009/06/23/obama-to-insurers-what-are-you

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

My Generation’s Disease

Benjamin Brophy | 5.17.13

The Liberal Union Behind the IRS

Jeffrey Lord | 5.16.13

Not Ready for Primetime Players

Daniel J. Flynn | 5.17.13

Assessing a Week of Scandal

Matt Purple | 5.17.13

Oops, Maybe Government is Tyrannical

Marta H. Mossburg | 5.17.13

From Bimbos to Benghazi

Jeffrey Lord | 5.9.13

The View From the Other Side

George H. Wittman | 5.17.13

ADVERTISEMENT