The ongoing battle over Iran's presidential election is
important, but isn't likely to lead to a free society.
Mir-Hossain Mousavi is more moderate than Mahmoud Ahmadinejad,
but still a member of the elite. Nor is the Iranian
president in charge of the most important state institutions,
particularly the security agencies.
Indeed, Mousavi is a long-time fan of nuclear power. Even
if he had the authority to shut down the nuclear program, he
likely wouldn't. In short, whatever happens as a result of
the current protests, the West is still going to be stuck
confronting the Iranian nuclear program. Reports
the Los Angeles Times:
The widespread protests in Iran, even in the improbable event
they deliver presidential challenger Mir-Hossein Mousavi to
power, are unlikely to dramatically change the country's
nuclear ambitions or the strategic complications the West faces
in countering Tehran's political gambits across the Middle
East.
Iran's nuclear program, which Washington alleges is intended to
produce atomic weapons, is ingrained in the national psyche. It
was begun decades ago and is embraced across the Iranian
political spectrum. Its future rests more on the wishes of
supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and the ruling clerics
than it does with hard-line President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad or
the more moderate Mousavi.
The nuclear endeavor, along with geography, vast oil supplies
and resistance to Western pressure, are crucial to Iran's
stature in the region. The political tumult and bloodshed over
the June 12 elections may force a shift in domestic policies,
but not a scientific mission that predates the 1979 Islamic
Revolution.
"The elections are a crisis from within the system itself,"
said Hassan Nafaa, a political scientist at Cairo University.
"It might change internal issues, but the nuclear agenda will
not be modified. Iranians are united around this.
Let's hope democracy triumphs in Iran. But even then, our
geopolitical problems with Iran won't be over.
Actually I agree they might still build nukes, but the issue is
no longer Mousavi vs. Ahmafamarocker, it's Khamenei vs.
democracy.
It's conceivable Khamenei will be able to back down and put
Mousavi in, without losing any of his power. But he's going to
have to be mighty slick to do that. If he does, he'll have
elevated to president somebody who knows that Khamenei repeatedly
threated to have him arrested or even killed, and that he was
saved from this through the power of the people.
What's more, the people will know this too. Whatever they go
along with from then on, at gunpoint, how many of them will
really, in their hearts, think of Khamenei as the "Supreme Guide"
past that point? How many of them ever will now, no matter what
Khamenei does?
You know, the nukes built under a future Mousavi government would
be even less of a threat if Mousavi thought we had helped him get
where he was....just thinking out loud here..
It's pretty facile to equate this with the situation which would
have prevailed if Khamenei had just certified Mousavi as the
winner from the outset, which would indeed not have been a huge
change.
Sean| 6.21.09 @ 3:51PM
What evidence do we have that this was a fraudulent election?
Only semi-reliable poll showed that the election results were
about right.
Roy| 6.21.09 @ 10:17AM
Actually I agree they might still build nukes, but the issue is no longer Mousavi vs. Ahmafamarocker, it's Khamenei vs. democracy.
It's conceivable Khamenei will be able to back down and put Mousavi in, without losing any of his power. But he's going to have to be mighty slick to do that. If he does, he'll have elevated to president somebody who knows that Khamenei repeatedly threated to have him arrested or even killed, and that he was saved from this through the power of the people.
What's more, the people will know this too. Whatever they go along with from then on, at gunpoint, how many of them will really, in their hearts, think of Khamenei as the "Supreme Guide" past that point? How many of them ever will now, no matter what Khamenei does?
You know, the nukes built under a future Mousavi government would be even less of a threat if Mousavi thought we had helped him get where he was....just thinking out loud here..
It's pretty facile to equate this with the situation which would have prevailed if Khamenei had just certified Mousavi as the winner from the outset, which would indeed not have been a huge change.
Sean| 6.21.09 @ 3:51PM
What evidence do we have that this was a fraudulent election? Only semi-reliable poll showed that the election results were about right.
Gold| 7.9.09 @ 11:35PM
buy ultima gold
buy ultima gold
buy ultima gold
ultima gold
ultima gold
ultima gold
eq2 platinum
ffxi gil
seo tools
loan modification
warhammer guides
loan modification
wow 80
mmorpg database
hot gamers
daily trivia questions
ffxi gil
loan modification
cooking oil recycling
mmorpg games
ultima gold
mmorpg guides
Age of conan
Warhammer Online
World of Warcraft
Archloard
City of Heroes
loan modification
song| 1.17.10 @ 3:42AM
nike outlet
adidas outlet