The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

While until this point most of the health care focus has been on the Senate side, today the House Democrats released a draft of their own plan. I just read through the outline, though you can check out the full 850 pages here. The short version is that there's a reason that liberals like it -- it reads like their Christmas wish list. The trouble is, that it doesn't explain how Democrats expect to pay for the legislation. And if the Congressional Budget Office's valuation of the various Senate bills is any indication, the price tag will be off the charts. Okay, so here are more details.

Most significantly, the House bill includes a government plan at a time when there's an emerging consensus that there's not enough votes to get one through the Senate. House Democrats claim that the plan would be "self‐sustaining ‐‐ financed only by its premiums" and thus be on a "level playing field" to compete with private insurers. Of course, in real life, we have to assume that the government plan will ultimately have access to general government revenues if it's in any danger of failing. A good example is Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Though they operated as private companies, they benefited from the implicit backing of government, which allowed them to become the dominate players mortgage market. While the companies' Democratic defenders brushed aside conservative critics who claimed it was in effect a government enterprise, when push came to shove, government did step in to bail out the companies because they had a piece of a majority of mortgages in America. When private insurers can't make a profit they go out of business. But who in reality thinks the government plan will be allowed to fold if it's losing money? Is government going to close a plan that provides health insurance to tens of millions of Americans or is it going to pump general revenues into saving it? Anybody who is being intellectually honest knows the answer to that. Private insurers trying to compete against a government plan would be like a gambler trying to beat the house -- over time, the house always wins.

The bill also calls for the creation of a national, government-run insurance exchange, in which individuals would receive government subsidies to purchase either the government plan or chose among government-designed private plans. The subsidies would be on a sliding scale and go up to 400 percent of the poverty level ($43,000 for an individual or $88,000 for a family of four), which is at the midpoint of the range being advanced in the two Senate bills. One key fact worth highlighting: "Over time, the Exchange will be opened to all employers as another choice for covering their employees." This directly contradicts President Obama's pledge that everybody who is happy with the health care they receive can keep it. About 63 percent of covered Americans get their insurance through their employers, meaning that encouraging employers to dump workers into the government run exchange will effectively threaten the current health care plans of most of the covered population.

The plan would also bar insurers from excluding those with preexisting conditions or charge them different rates based on their health status, and it would create federal mandates forcing individuals to purchase health care and empoyers to cover their workers or pay a tax.

Curiously the plan calls for, "More training of primary care doctors and an expansion of the pipeline of individuals going into health professions, including primary care, nursing and public health..." But the biggest problem in attracting more medical students to go into primary care is that Medicare has driven down reimbursement rates for physicians, and instead of dealing with this problem, the bill would actually exacerbate it by allowing the government plan to reimburse doctors at rates "similar" to Medicare levels. Typical liberal thinking -- government policy creates a problem and the solution is yet more government.

The plan also calls for a massive expansion of Medicaid to 133 percent of the poverty level. "Recognizing the budget challenges in many states," the outline reads, "this expansion will be fully federally financed."

Of course, this triggers the question: "financed how"? The federal government, as you know, is not awash in cash these days. Well, the outline conveniently leaves out that tricky financing part. Though we now know that among other new taxes, they are considering a national sales tax (or VAT), a prospect that I wrote about earlier.

View all comments (10) | Leave a comment

Real American| 6.19.09 @ 7:25PM

and in the end, after the government completely ruins private health insurance and everyone is forced onto the government dole, er, plan, health care will be reduced to the crap levels we see in Europe and Canada. QUALITY WILL GO DOWN, just like with everything else the government tries to run. Cost overruns are always just the first problems with govt programs. The way to fix cost problems is to reduce quality and availability of care. Since there won't be any private insurers left, the govt (surprise!) will have a monopoly and dictate rationing and price controls. We'll all suffer...just so a few people who can't afford health care get some. What a joke!

sandy| 12.5.09 @ 9:29PM

Sports shoes play an important Chris Paul Shoes in our life. Adidas shoes brand is a professional Gilbert Shoes.

helen| 11.19.09 @ 3:59AM

Timeberland boots on sale now! Do you want moreTimeberland boots information?

lkjnljhn| 11.28.09 @ 7:49AM

Paul Smith has been collaborating with a few different organizations recently and his latest venture sees him

teaming up with Japanese bicycle saddle specialist, Paul Smith bag, on a limited edition leather saddle. The release features Smith’s signature

stripes where only 20 will be available at Paul Smith Clothing

store in Japan and 8 at the Floral Street store in London. Get on it quick

Pig| 12.3.09 @ 12:21PM

Steve Nash Shoes approaches. Duncan Shoes

ghd hair straighter| 1.16.10 @ 10:12AM

Method 1: Shampoo and Conditioner can be used to verify that.
ghd blue nano flat ironReason: head towards the track surface active molecules can rinse the active ingredient, it reduces the cost of the hair fiber, the lower the resistance, hair wet, soft, smooth anti-static protective film forming layer. ghd iv styling set

golf| 1.16.10 @ 10:15AM

to keep health only do more sports your best choice mizuno golf drivers irons fairway woods .with more space only ping golf drivers irons fairway woods putter hybrid.

Health Bill | 9.2.10 @ 12:44PM

A very smart and diplomatic answer. It’s really appreciable and general.
.............
cherry123
.............
Health Bill

nfl2shop.com| 11.2.10 @ 6:46AM

NFL Jerseys Cheap NFL Jerseys Wholesale NFL Jerseys NHL Jerseys Cheap NHL Jerseys Cheap Jerseys Wholesale Jerseys Wholesale NHL Jerseys MLB Jerseys Cheap MLB Jerseys
Wholesale MLB Jerseys

tiffany outlet| 3.7.11 @ 2:18AM

I have wanted to write something like this on my blog and you gave me an idea. Thank you.

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by Philip Klein

http://spectator.org/blog/2009/06/19/house-dems-health-care-plan-in

ADVERTISEMENT

The Spectacle Blog

Illusionist

Yogi Love | 10:06AM

At Least He Apologized

Ross Kaminsky | 8:34AM

Gallup: Veterans Prefer Romney

W. James Antle, III | 5.28.12

Markos Moulitsas is Scum

Quin Hillyer | 5.28.12

Weekend Political Wrap-Up, Memorial Day Edition

W. James Antle, III | 5.27.12

An Honor Flight Story

TAS Staff | 5.26.12

WaPost Criticizes Romney's Lack of Rhythm

Aaron Goldstein | 5.25.12

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

Follow Me

Jay D. Homnick | 5.25.12

Terror by Any Other Name

Robert Stacy McCain | 5.29.12

How About the Record of DOE Capital?

William Tucker | 5.25.12

ADVERTISEMENT