The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
The Largest Selection of Liberal-baiting Merchandise on the Net!
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email

AmSpecBlog

Taxes, Taxes, and More Taxes

That's what we face if Congress passes health care "reform."  At least Charlie Rangel of the House Ways and Means Committee seems somewhat honest in this regard.  His committee has issued a paper listing different options for raising $600 billion.

Reports National Journal:

The Ways and Means option would raise more than half the needed revenues from limiting the tax exclusion for employer-provided benefits to 110 percent of the actuarial model of the Federal Employee Health Benefit Blue Cross/Blue Shield standard option. Coverage excluded from tax would be limited to $17,240 for families and $6,800 for individuals beginning in 2013, indexed for inflation in future years with a 50-50 blend of general and medical inflationary increases. That option alone would raise $306 billion.

The Ways and Means paper assumes the entire $600 billion in new taxes would begin to take effect on Jan. 1, 2013. A 2 percent surtax on individuals earning more than $200,000 and households with $250,000 or more in adjusted gross income would raise $256 billion.

That would be in keeping with President Obama's pledge not to raise taxes on all but the wealthiest households, and the 2013 effective date assumes the nation would be out of recession. But many small-business owners are already chafing at seeing the top tax rates hiked to 36 percent and 39.6 percent in 2011 under Obama's budget plan.

Rangel's paper couples the 2 percent surtax with a 0.375 percent increase in the Medicare tax on both employers and employees, estimated to raise $344 billion -- also likely to cause problems with the small business lobby and perhaps liberal interest groups that argue it is a regressive tax. Currently, employers and employees each pay a 1.45 percent tax to fund Medicare; the 1993 budget bill repealed the cap on income subject to the Medicare tax.

The options paper appears to recognize that raising the Medicare tax might be politically untenable. If that is the case, as a fallback the Ways and Means document suggests a number of revenue-replacing options, including limiting the tax exclusion and a $200 billion proposal to add a new 3 percent payroll tax on employers' healthcare spending. The paper argues that employers would essentially come out even, because they would be saving money on employees' health care under the overhaul bill.

President Barack Obama's promise about not raising taxes on most Americans looks increasingly tattered.  But then, it's hard to believe that anyone ever took that promise seriously.

Comments

Mike| 6.18.09 @ 8:41AM

We do seem to have arrived at a point of decision. Our creditors, notably China, have signaled that the days we can simply borrow money and spend freely are over, or at least nearing the end. It appears we will soon have no alternative but to raise taxes to pay for OUR spending. We will have to be responsible. What a novel concept. Enter health care. If we can agree, and I don't believe there is agreement, that all Americans should have access to affordable health care, we are going to have to spend some money. How do we pay? Given our past profligate behavior, I suspect taxes are the only answer, unless we decide to throw 4o some million of our fellow citizens off of the train. For all of the rhetoric to the contrary, I think this is the plan of conservatives and the GOP who continue to offer only market based solutions, including little or no regulation, as the alternative to the administration's proposal. We have already seen how the market works for health care in this country. Those who argue that we have the best health care in the world simply do not know the statistics or refuse to acknowledge them. Mr. Bandow writes, "At least Charlie Rangel of the House Ways and Means Committee seems somewhat honest in this regard. " Honesty. What a novel concept.

ds80| 6.18.09 @ 8:47AM

Mr. Bandow has put his finger on exactly how the Left will spin the Boy President's promise to not raise taxes on most Americans. With a straight face they'll say: "Nobody really believed that.

As if that alone is justification for the Boy President's arrogance and willful lying, and the State-Run Media's complicit silence on the matter all this time.

Roy| 6.18.09 @ 10:44AM

OK Mike - so when Obama claimed that he would only raise taxes on 5% of Americans you:

-snickered at the obvious falsehood of it and wondered how many idiot votes it would bring in;
-were one of the idiot votes it brought in?

As far as the idea that "the market" is a good description of our existing health care system, only a leftist could believe that.

Leave a Comment

ADVERTISEMENT

Are you in a mob?

The Democrats say Obamacare opponents are a mob. Are they right?

         

Participating in this survey will subscribe you to the American Spectator email newsletter. You may unsubscribe at any time.

Members to Watch

Philip Klein

* * * *

The 39 Democrats Who Voted "No"

Philip Klein

* * * *

Pelosi's Pyrrhic Victory?

Philip Klein

* * * *

Pro-Life Amendment Passes Easily

Philip Klein

* * * *

The Stupak Amendment

W. James Antle, III

* * * *

One Step Forward, Two Races Back

George Neumayr

* * * *

Divisive Unanimity

Daniel J. Flynn

* * * *

Joe Wilson, Call Your Office

Larry Thornberry

* * * *

ACORN's Big Spender

Matthew Vadum

* * * *

The Spirit of 1989

Doug Bandow

* * * *

The Somali-Kenya Connection

George H. Wittman

* * * *

Tex Mess

William Murchison

* * * *

Feeding the Beast

Philip Klein

* * * *
ADVERTISEMENT