Hundreds of Iranian Americans, shouting “Democracy” and “Where’s
my vote?” marched in Washington on Sunday to protest the election
results in Iran.
The demonstration began outside the Iranian Interests Section in
Washington at 11 am, but after about an hour a police officer
asked that the group to disperse. Instead, a number of DC police
cars escorted the protesters as they marched down Wisconsin
Avenue, through Georgetown, and eventually ended at the National
Mall near the Lincoln Memorial.
The views among those who gathered were not monolithic by any
means. Some people I spoke with supported Mir-Hossein Mousavi as
an incremental step toward change in Iran, while others believed
that the entire Islamic regime needed to fall altogether for real
change to occur. A smaller contingent waved the Shah-era
Iranian flag and argued that the current regime needed to be
replaced by a monarchy. At times, the exchanges between the
Mousavi supporters and pro-Shah individuals turned heated. But at
the minimum, there was a general consensus that the election in
Iran on Friday was a sham.
“We want to stand in solidarity with the people of Iran and say
we reject the results,” said Babak Talabi, of McLean, Virginia,
who helped organize the protest. “We expect the governments in
the West and the news outlets in the West to reject the
‘official’ results.”
Talabi was born in Shiraz, Iran and moved to America in 1987,
when he was seven years old. He said the protest came about
spontaneously, through Facebook and text messaging. It was
partially an outgrowth of an effort, called “Our Campaign,” to
get Iranians living in America to cast absentee ballots in the
Iranian election.
He said they were making four demands on Iran: to release all
political prisoners; reopen all forms of media that were shut
down in the past few days including cell phone service, text
messaging, Facebook, and the internet; investigate fraud in
Friday’s elections; and hold new, fully transparent, elections.
“The freedom and democracy of the Iranian people has been
demolished, and this is one major step, one major last stand that
we have to do to show that we are not happy, and we are not going
to take it anymore,” said Mason Darvishin of Great Falls,
Virginia.
Darvishin, who said he moved from Tehran 27 years ago, when he
was 10 years old, said that while Mousavi may not be ideal, he’s
an improvement over Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
“Mousavi is a liberal individual within the group of this regime
and any step forward for the Iranian people is better than
dealing with somebody like Ahmadenijad, who has set us 10 steps
back,” he said. “So we would like to do this in a smooth
transition, in a democratic way, and getting the moderates in
front, slowly, inside of the regime without going through
bloodshed of a revolution.”
A younger female who asked not to be identified made a similar
point more concisely. “Right now, Mousavi equals democracy,” she
said as she marched holding a photo of Mousavi with the caption,
“Elected president by the people of Iran.” She added, “Baby
steps.”
Another female demonstrator who asked not to be identified
because she’s scheduled to visit Iran in a few weeks went
further, saying while Mousavi is better than Ahmadenijad, the
whole regime needs to collapse for real change to happen. She
said she’s been in touch with cousins in Iran over the past few
days. “They’re not going to stop protesting,” she said. “They’re
calling this Iranian Revolution 2.”
Eric Foulidi, who said he was born in Iran but moved to America
40 years ago, held a Shah-era flag and said that the younger
Mousavi supporters were naïve.
“Thirty years ago our young people made a mistake and brought
this regime,” Foulidi said. “Thirty years later, today,
another young people of Iran is making another big mistake.”
He continued, “Everything is corrupt over there. Mousavi is
corrupt. We know that from 10 years ago. And these young
people who are 20 or 25, they don’t know that. I don’t know
what’s happening in their mind to think Mousavi is going to
change anything. It’s not going to happen.”
Instead, he said he supported a kingdom, which he insisted could
be democratic.
“Iran and the Middle East needs a monarchy,” he said. “It cannot
be presidential over there. The culture in the Middle East does
not like presidential. It’s not Europe, it’s not America.”
Yet another protester, Saed Salehinia, shouted “down with the
Islamic Regime of Iran,” but wanted to replace it with what he
said would be a “free, secular, and socialist” government.
“Mousavi is not a reformer,” Salehinia said. “People who say
that, they are either charlatans or ignorant. Mousavi was in
power for 10 years and he was in charge of the biggest political
massacres in first 10 years of Iranian government.”
Salehinia said he was jailed three times by the Islamic
government while living in Iran, but escaped through the
northwest border in 1997 and was granted asylum in the United
States. He identified himself as a member of the Workers
Communist Party of Iran.
Note: Below, I posted a video I shot of protesters marching down
Wisconsin Ave. You can hear people driving north honking in
support of the demonstrators, and can see a police vehicle in the
background escorting the group. Quite a contrast between a free
society that welcomes people’s rights to voice their opinions and
the images coming out of Iran of the brutal Iranian regime
beating down protesters.
About the Author
Philip Klein is The American Spectator's Washington correspondent. You can follow him on Twitter at: http://twitter.com/Philipaklein