Ed Whelan's outing of the liberal legal blogger Publius has
started some debate over anonymous and pseudonymous blogging.
Personally, I woudn't have outed him -- a position Whelan himself
now
come around to -- for his offenses. But not all reasons for
anonymity strike me as equally valid.
One of Publius' reasons for wanting to remain anonymous was that
his political opinions differed from his family's. It seems to me
that the solution to that is to keep quiet about your political
opinions. Even as a political commentator, I don't like to shove
my politics down people's throats. I figure people who visit
political websites, read newspaper op-ed pages and political
magazines, and tune into political shows on TV or radio are fair
game because they are actively seeking out political commentary.
But I don't forward my articles to friends and family who haven't
expressed an interest. I don't go out of my way to share my
opinions with people I meet in a non-political context. And I
only recently and reluctantly began posting my articles on my
Facebook page, at the request of my more political friends.
But I am not going to start writing under the name Rhinocerous 55
because I have friends and family members who will undoubtedly
disagree with my political opinions. Having people disagree with
you -- even people you are close to -- is the price of making
political commentary. If you don't want to pay it, then you
should probably try stamp collecting or some other hobby.
Concealing your identity so that people will not know your actual
beliefs -- while criticizing people who write under their own
names -- is quite a bit less honorable than concealing your
identity to protect your family's physical security.
I don't have a pedigree (III), but I damned sure don't come here
for a "political hobby"
I come here because you guys write a lot of truth, and I am
concerned...deeply concerned...for my country.
I've made mine, but what are we going to leave for our kids and
grandkids?
Best regards
Old Texican| 6.9.09 @ 3:52PM
Mr. Antle...uh... The Third:
I was interrupted writing the last post. I have a national
company to run.
Do you think for a moment, that posting honest thoughts here that
I am NOT on the lists, (plural), that Obama and crew are
compiling?
Hell !!!!!! they know my name and address! They can come for me
any time they please.
I have posted on your site knowing full well what is in store for
me if these bast***s get control of everything.
I have found friends/compatriots here. Thank you for your
site.
I don't feel quite so alone.
I am hoping for a hundred MILLION Americans show up at a
tea-party July 4th. My plans are to be there...again to have my
picture took. (sic) and my name added to "peaceful assembly".
I am a world wide # 1 best selling author. I write pretty
well.
I have even outed myself here for anyone who wanted to chase the
link.
I take serious offense at your little smart arse article!
SEND ME MY DONATION BACK...OR APOLOGIZE!
Old Texican, I didn't say there was anything *wrong* with posting
under a pseudonym, especially for commenters. There are plenty of good reasons to do so. I
just don't think not wanting people to know your real opinions --
as was the case with the "outed" blogger -- is one of them.
John| 6.10.09 @ 6:44AM
Humm...
1. Old Texan... Pedigree? I had an unoriginal father and
grandfather, too. I also have the scars from the fights with
verious lenders and security folks who found their credit showing
up in mine to prove it. The III admittedly adds "cool" every once
in a while, though.
2. Amspec has my real email address. They can look it up. If I
say something really out of line, my fellow "Trey" can drop me a
note and tell me so. I live in a real house that I pay for, own
three cars that are almost paid off.. I also have a job where
sometimes investigators poke around so that I am allowed to do
stuff.
3. I also have a wife and kids who do not appreciate my use of my
full name. In the early days I adopted a "call sign" that was
hung on me in college in the late 1970's, to protect them more
than me.
So Mr. Antle's point is well taken. Sometimes the motives are
nefarious and bloggin' under wraps is a cover for poor, boorish
behavior.
If the Editors/Site Owners/Webmasters know who you are, however,
it is different.
I thought Whelen's exposure was ill advised and rash. If he knew
who Publius was, and that blogger was being something less than
reasonable in his representations or opinions, Whelen should have
contacted him privately and directly to request a halt to what
seemed offensive (I have seen Publius post before, juvenile
strikes me as an apt description of his style of opinion
writing.)
But then... I am old at this stuff...
I like "OldTexan" it has a certain flair to it. Tells a bunch
about the poster.
Regards,
John - The Mighty Fahvaag
Angel| 6.10.09 @ 10:11PM
Wow, one-hundred million people at the July 4 Tea Parties--now
there's a REAL SWEET thought. :)
Angel| 6.10.09 @ 10:22PM
You're not alone, Old Tex--they're lots of us out here. Thank
God.
Old Texican| 6.9.09 @ 3:07PM
Dear Mr. Antle...uh III
I don't have a pedigree (III), but I damned sure don't come here for a "political hobby"
I come here because you guys write a lot of truth, and I am concerned...deeply concerned...for my country.
I've made mine, but what are we going to leave for our kids and grandkids?
Best regards
Old Texican| 6.9.09 @ 3:52PM
Mr. Antle...uh... The Third:
I was interrupted writing the last post. I have a national company to run.
Do you think for a moment, that posting honest thoughts here that I am NOT on the lists, (plural), that Obama and crew are compiling?
Hell !!!!!! they know my name and address! They can come for me any time they please.
I have posted on your site knowing full well what is in store for me if these bast***s get control of everything.
I have found friends/compatriots here. Thank you for your site.
I don't feel quite so alone.
I am hoping for a hundred MILLION Americans show up at a tea-party July 4th. My plans are to be there...again to have my picture took. (sic) and my name added to "peaceful assembly".
I am a world wide # 1 best selling author. I write pretty well.
I have even outed myself here for anyone who wanted to chase the link.
I take serious offense at your little smart arse article!
SEND ME MY DONATION BACK...OR APOLOGIZE!
W. James Antle III| 6.9.09 @ 6:26PM
Old Texican, I didn't say there was anything *wrong* with posting under a pseudonym, especially for commenters. There are plenty of good reasons to do so. I just don't think not wanting people to know your real opinions -- as was the case with the "outed" blogger -- is one of them.
John| 6.10.09 @ 6:44AM
Humm...
1. Old Texan... Pedigree? I had an unoriginal father and grandfather, too. I also have the scars from the fights with verious lenders and security folks who found their credit showing up in mine to prove it. The III admittedly adds "cool" every once in a while, though.
2. Amspec has my real email address. They can look it up. If I say something really out of line, my fellow "Trey" can drop me a note and tell me so. I live in a real house that I pay for, own three cars that are almost paid off.. I also have a job where sometimes investigators poke around so that I am allowed to do stuff.
3. I also have a wife and kids who do not appreciate my use of my full name. In the early days I adopted a "call sign" that was hung on me in college in the late 1970's, to protect them more than me.
So Mr. Antle's point is well taken. Sometimes the motives are nefarious and bloggin' under wraps is a cover for poor, boorish behavior.
If the Editors/Site Owners/Webmasters know who you are, however, it is different.
I thought Whelen's exposure was ill advised and rash. If he knew who Publius was, and that blogger was being something less than reasonable in his representations or opinions, Whelen should have contacted him privately and directly to request a halt to what seemed offensive (I have seen Publius post before, juvenile strikes me as an apt description of his style of opinion writing.)
But then... I am old at this stuff...
I like "OldTexan" it has a certain flair to it. Tells a bunch about the poster.
Regards,
John - The Mighty Fahvaag
Angel| 6.10.09 @ 10:11PM
Wow, one-hundred million people at the July 4 Tea Parties--now there's a REAL SWEET thought. :)
Angel| 6.10.09 @ 10:22PM
You're not alone, Old Tex--they're lots of us out here. Thank God.