The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

In a matter of weeks Terry McAuliffe, the well-funded former Clintonite and DNC chair, has gone from the odds on favorite to win the Democratic gubernatorial nomination in Virginia, to the underdog heading into today's primary. Recent polls have shown a surge by the more moderate Creigh Deeds, with McAuliffe and Brian Moran fighting it out for second place.

With everything now hinging on turnout, Mo Elleithee, McAuliffe's senior campaign strategist, just sent out an email touting an internal poll showing him in a dead heat for first:

We conducted a poll over the last three nights - with 200 interviews a night.  We never base decisions on one night's worth of interviews because the sample is too small.  But throughout this campaign our night-by-night numbers have been reliable and have picked up trends such as the recent increase in support for Deeds.  I am encouraged that last night's interviews have us tied with Deeds.

McAuliffe: 33
Deeds: 33
Moran: 21

While this is not definitive, last night's trend shows this is a competitive race and we need to make sure that every vote counts and we need to make every effort to turn out our voters today.

Mark my words: we can win this thing tonight.  There are three key things to take away from our polling research.

Elleithee argues that McAuliffe's support for stricter gun control is resonating, that he is the most electable, and that the campaigns field operation will make the difference in a fluid race. The fact that the McAuliffe people, in an effort to boost Election Day turnout, are touting an internal poll showing him tied with somebody who was in distant third just a few weeks ago, probably isn't the greatest sign. But then again, I remember that I was talking to McAuliffe in New Hampshire the moment the AP called the primary for Hillary Clinton, in what was a stunning upset. So we'll have to wait and see how credible this email proves to be.

View all comments (4) | Leave a comment

Violett| 6.9.09 @ 6:27PM

Many of your readers find McAuliffe detestable. TAS wrote reams about this clown in the nineties and I was just hoping I could forget about him.

CC Ryder| 6.9.09 @ 7:01PM

Is this plan any worse than Mitt Romney's Massachusetts' health care plan disaster? I don't see much difference between Romney and Kennedy.

CC Ryder| 6.9.09 @ 8:58PM

Phil, I posted my 7:01PM comment on another thread--what gives?

SC Mike| 6.9.09 @ 10:58PM

Terry is toast. Deeds got almost half the vote with McAuliffe a weak second 20 points behind. Maybe the weather played a role, but he apparently lost big even in NoVA where gun-controllers are prevalent.

What part of Terry's message resonated?

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by Philip Klein

http://spectator.org/blog/2009/06/09/mcauliffe-camp-cites-internal

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

Follow Me

Jay D. Homnick | 5.25.12

A Test of National Honor

Hal G.P. Colebatch | 5.25.12

How About the Record of DOE Capital?

William Tucker | 5.25.12

The Great Debate

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.24.12

ADVERTISEMENT