The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
The Largest Selection of Liberal-baiting Merchandise on the Net!
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email

AmSpecBlog

Smoot-Hawley Lives

As I wrote previously, it seems as if the disastrous Smoot-Hawley protectionist statute has been quietly revived. Protectionism has come back to America, and only now have we begun to notice.

Predictably, the Canadian Federation of Municipalities has endorsed a plan to support communities that refuse to buy products from countries that slap trade restrictions on Canadian products and services, Reuters reports:

The measure is a response to a provision in the U.S. economic stimulus package passed by Congress in February that says public works projects should use iron, steel and other goods made in the United States.

The United States is Canada's largest trading partner, and Canadians have complained the restrictions will bar their companies from billions of dollars in business that they have previously had access to.

"This U.S. protectionist policy is hurting Canadian firms, costing Canadian jobs and damaging Canadian efforts to grow our economy in the midst of a worldwide recession," said Sherbrooke, Quebec, Mayor Jean Perrault, also president of the federation that represents cities and towns across Canada. [...]

It's only going to get worse.

Comments

Oldefarte| 6.7.09 @ 11:35AM

Additionally, this disguised protectionism is most probably in violation of the NAFTA trade agreement-------oh well, dictators can do just about anything they wish, until such time as their stupid voting populations wake up and realize who and what these dictators truly are!!!!

Sean| 6.7.09 @ 2:28PM

Well who has the most clout in a trade war Canada or the US? We could crush them in a trade war. I think in this instance government money should not be spent at all, but if it is it should be spent in the US.

Also before we can have true free trade abroad we must have free trade in the US. Why are we trying to restrict the use of mail for tobacco products from outside the country and between the states? Could it be to protect high tax states?

Bob| 6.7.09 @ 3:06PM

Vadum -- this is one of those few occasions on which we agree. Protectionism is a dangerous precedent. The "buy American" provisions of the stimulus bill are clearly protectionist in nature. On the other hand, we need to deal with FAIR trade. When the Chinese subsidize their steel industry and have steep tariffs on rice, we must respond in kind without hesitation and be clear about what we have done. On this topic, the Obama administration does scare me.... But then again, the Bush administration was also too easy on Chinese trade....

ds80| 6.7.09 @ 9:56PM

Pssst. Bob ....

Bush aint prez no mo'.
Let it go.

Angel| 6.8.09 @ 12:28AM

'Good Republican' Bob strikes again.

Roy| 6.8.09 @ 1:59AM

In a "trade war", both sides lose, Sean. Let's say Canada loses 30% of their GNP and the US only loses 10%... ok we "crushed" them but..yeah, it still kind of stinks.

Bob| 6.8.09 @ 8:19AM

ds80 -- it doesn't surprise me that you missed the point. The point is that ALL administrations seem to have weak knees when it comes to standing up to trade fairness, i.e., it is NOT an ideology thing. We need to stand up for our country when we are treated unfairly.

JP| 6.8.09 @ 9:07AM

Free Trade is not a zero sum game when one's GDP depends the export of hundreds of billions of dollars of its goods. Canada has a relatively small population. Yet, we exports large amounts of goods and services to them. Canada could more easily replace the US than vice versa. The MSM and various cause groups have painted a picture that indicates that the US no longer exports anything other than Molly Cyrus and Big Macs. This is far from the truth. We export billions in foods, processed foods, telecom, machine tools, IT services and hardware/software, areospace products, automobiles, financial services, lumber, cement and other building materials, not mention entertainment, steel, and precison instruments. In each one of these areas, we have overseas competitors who would love to replace us. If Canada slaps on a tarriff in response to our own monkey business, we lose.

Both parties have been guilty of protectionism, just as there are free trade proponents in both parties. California would be the biggest state to lose out.

Tim| 6.8.09 @ 9:28AM

What the hayell does this administration have against Canada?
Maybe they should start a nuclear weapons program, that would get them some respect.

replica handbags| 8.3.09 @ 12:50PM

replica designer handbags,provide you the best quality,selection and price you can only find in the top specialty stores,Keeping you abreast of the lastest trends and providing the convenience of shopping from home. replica handbags
replica handbags ,
replica handbags ,
replica Mulberry handbags ,

replica handbags ,

Bottega replica handbags ,

replica Burberry handbags ,

replica Cartier handbags ,

replica Christian Louboutin Shoes

winter boots| 8.6.09 @ 3:07AM

Australia UGG. Have a good reputation and quality. Now that winter boots are sale in very hot.
Friends, autumn has come, winter is also not far from the pace, you do need a pair of Boots? We have here the best quality boots and the price of thecheap boots . Also to Free Shipping and taxes and fees.1 Week Delivery To You Door! Welcome to buy!

women boots| 8.6.09 @ 3:07AM

UGG This is a Australia brand, has a good reputation and the quality of the highest quality, each used in the production of pairs of Boots are the 100% genuine sheepskin, and bring you comfort every step, hold it is not afraid of the cold winter .Friends, autumn has come, winter is also not far from the pace, you do need a pair of Boots? We have here the best quality boots and the price of the cheap boots. have categories for Cardy Boots,
crochet boots,
Mini boots, Short boots, Tall boots,
Sandal, supply of the men boots and women boots . Friends, if you buy in our store, we can Free Shipping & Customs, 1 Week Delivery To You Door!

Leave a Comment

ADVERTISEMENT

Are you in a mob?

The Democrats say Obamacare opponents are a mob. Are they right?

         

Participating in this survey will subscribe you to the American Spectator email newsletter. You may unsubscribe at any time.

Members to Watch

Philip Klein

* * * *

The 39 Democrats Who Voted "No"

Philip Klein

* * * *

Pelosi's Pyrrhic Victory?

Philip Klein

* * * *

Pro-Life Amendment Passes Easily

Philip Klein

* * * *

The Stupak Amendment

W. James Antle, III

* * * *

One Step Forward, Two Races Back

George Neumayr

* * * *

Divisive Unanimity

Daniel J. Flynn

* * * *

Joe Wilson, Call Your Office

Larry Thornberry

* * * *

ACORN's Big Spender

Matthew Vadum

* * * *

The Spirit of 1989

Doug Bandow

* * * *

The Somali-Kenya Connection

George H. Wittman

* * * *

Tex Mess

William Murchison

* * * *

Feeding the Beast

Philip Klein

* * * *
ADVERTISEMENT