The Spectacle Blog
Fresh clue, unconfirmed, but connects to intel from best signals source. On the Saddam tapes, word used for plague, as in, how do we send a plague against the USA?? Word used is plague in Arabic, but it is the same word used in other source that Saddam Hussein regime connects with its West Nile Virus development, 1997-1999. Moved labs and equipment to Sudan in 1999.
Not confirmed. Not confirmed. Not. This is all analysis. Early days.
Best signals source says that Ahmadinejad's missing ten days in late January early February can now be explained by his busy, Ernst Blofeld schedule.
The first several days Ahmadinejad was participating in a national exercise to rehearse air defense and national deployment in the event (and it is expected sooner rather than later) of the strategic strike by US and Israeli air and special operations power.
After that, Ahmadinejad toured coastal fortresses to inspect the offensive missile and seaborne power (cruise missiles, ground to ground medium range stuff) to strike at shipping in the Straits of Hormuz and also at the major oil fields in eastern Arabia.
Ahmadinejad and the IRGC leadership and the Council of Elders are of one mind that the US and Israel will attack (sooner rather than later). The Tehran regime will not wait to be attacked. It is most likely that the Tehran regime will attack first, using proxies in Syria, in Lebanon, in Gaza, directed against Israel to force the US to respond piecemeal and hastily.
Having spent hundreds of hours afield in pursuit of quail, pheasant, chuckar, ducks and geese, I sympathize with the Veep. He's made a bad mistake that we all hope won't prove fatal to his hunting pal. But that's all there is to it. Or would be, but for the fragile egos of the White House press gaggle.
Were it up to them, Cheney would have been dialing Tim Russert's home number before poor Whittington hit the ground. The arrogance of the White House knows no bounds. How dare they give the story -- indirectly, at that -- to a local paper and not CBS or the NYT? How could they not issue a press release? Shouldn't the pool reporter have been in the ambulance with Ol' Harry?
The fact that this story has ridden the front page for so long is a testament to the press's narcissism, and nothing else. It's not yet fair to compare their outrage to Muslims rioting over the Mohammed cartoons. Yet.
Important to note that Brian Ross tonight on Nightline will stipulate that the Saddam tapes that intelligencesummit.org gave ABC News are just a small part of the assembled tape recordings of Saddam Hussein cabinet/staff meetings over many years. Also Brian Ross stipulates that the remaining available tapes are still undergoing translation.
This is a careful if general way of communcating that these are the early days of revelations from the tapes. Hoekstra doesn't know what's on them, ABC News doesn't know, neither -- to my certainty -- does DNI, CIA, DIA, FBI or any of the dozens of most concerned intelligence services from the five permanent members of the UN Security Council and the variety of Arab League states.
In sum, the tapes contain unknown material that may threaten present regimes. May. Threaten. Present.
Cheney on Hume's show: "They didn't like that we called the Corpus Christi Caller-Times instead of the New York Times." Priceless, and right on target. Good for him. And now the story will last for another couple days.
Convicted Al Qaeda poster boy Zacarias Moussaoui was removed from the jury selection proceedings for the death penalty phase of his trial yesterday in Virginia for several outbursts including the following renunciation of his French citizenship: "I'm not French...I stand here as a Muslim only. I do not stand here with a nation of homosexual crusaders." Whoa! Incarceration apparently takes a toll on the radical Muslim's inclination towards tolerance and inclusiveness. Well, one supposes as long as he doesn't draw cartoons depicting the likeness of these crusaders civic peace will be maintained and the Log Cabin Republicans will not be forced to burn down the Morrocan embassy. There are, of course, certain standards of decency that must be observed. Bad terrorist! No crayons for you!
Dave, interesting this Washington Post editorial page mention by David Ignatius of Chappaquiddick, one of not even a handful of (passing) mentions over the last few decades on the Post's editorial page (almost all of which regarded it, like David Broder in 2003, as nothing more than an "accident"; in 1993 Howard Kurtz termed it an "incident"; only Richard Cohen, in 1991, called it a "coverup").
If anything, Ignatius blurted out the truth that dare not speak its name. The liberal media culture has covered for Ted Kennedy since 1969. It has been complicit in his shamelessness. Now it wants to tar Dick Cheney with the Chappaquiddick brush? As one of its therapists might advise, you don't want to go there!
I just caught the ABC News top of the hour report on the radio: White House correspondent Ann Compton couldn't resist pointing out that while Cheney is speaking to the press, it's only one interview and not with a member of the White House press corps. They won't be satisfied until he gives a press conference.
By a filibuster, at least for now. I understand the temptation to take these settlements out of the hands of the trial lawyers, but the asbestos bill would have been more surrender than victory. As detailed by Human Events last week, it would have removed asbestos claims from the courts into a no-fault administrative process. Private companies would then "contribute" (involuntarily) to the trust fund.
The Heritage Foundation has found many flaws with the bill: claimants would show asbestos exposure "merely by filing an affidavit saying that they have been exposed'; the trust fund would award settlements to patients whose types of cancer "have not been clearly shown to be related to asbestos exposure"; and claims are automatically paid to claimants if they are not decided within 180 days. With such loose controls, $140 billion may not be enough to fund this trust fund.