The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Contra Richard Nadler, no one of any significance has argued that people's human value should be determined by how much they pay in taxes versus what they get in government services. What people, whose immigration-policy views look suspiciously like Nadler's, have argued is that low-skilled immigration -- legal and in some cases illegal -- will help the government's fiscal situation. This does not appear to be true.

View all comments (3) | Leave a comment

PolishKnight| 5.26.09 @ 10:49AM

While I agree with much of Richard's analysis, it appears to be incomplete and misleading. He says that Republicans are falling for a Democrat red-herring of evaluating people via their usefulness to government as taxpayers. I agree with him.

On the other hand, he uses illegal apologist rhetoric "they do work Americans won't do". He says: " most adult American workers don’t do “seasonal.”"

This is a massive red-herring. Of course most adult American workers don't do "seasonal" when the work is dominated by low paid illegals just as working class Americans used to do restaurant and hotel work until it became unreasonable for them to do so.

He then uses a half-full glass argument that low-wage yard work helps to increase the value of real estate by thousands of dollars. Has this guy been talking to my lawn-obsessed ex-girlfriend? Unless you're selling your home next week, blowing money on lawn care isn't going to make a difference in the long term bottom line. None. On the other hand, good luck selling your property if crime is up in the area due to MS-13 and the Mexican mafia.

If conservatives shouldn't fall for the liberal position of judging people by their usefulness as welfare state dupes to buy votes or taxpayer wage slaves, they also shouldn't fall for becoming ruthless cheapskates. That gave conservatives a bad name. I remember so-called small business conservatives defending minimum wage based upon the argument that, hey, the businesses wanted to make money so to hell with treating their labor decently. These were often small mom and pop operations. They said that they cared only about the bottom line. I responded, great, I'll take my business to wal-mart, thank you.

I personally don't mind spending a few extra dollars for decent and ethical service. If a college student or working class man wants $12 an hour to mow my lawn, I'm ok with that. If that means maybe only mowing it only every other week, that's ok even if Hank Hill doesn't approve.

Alan Brooks| 5.26.09 @ 1:21PM

"closing" (we wish--God, if only) the border would force businesses to automate more.

but the world wasn't created to please us

rentacar| 11.12.09 @ 5:50PM

This article is very interesting. Thank you very much for sharing .

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by W. James Antle, III

http://spectator.org/blog/2009/05/26/the-cost-of-illegal-immigratio

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

Follow Me

Jay D. Homnick | 5.25.12

A Test of National Honor

Hal G.P. Colebatch | 5.25.12

How About the Record of DOE Capital?

William Tucker | 5.25.12

The Great Debate

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.24.12

ADVERTISEMENT