Well, we know who really runs this administration. Obama
& Co. have backed away from their professed support
for the Free Trade Agreement with Panama.
Reports Bloomberg News:
U.S. officials said they will delay seeking congressional
approval for a pending free-trade deal with Panama until
President Barack Obama offers a new "framework" for trade.
The administration, which in March said it would move quickly
to pass the trade agreement with Panama, wants to outline how
trade fits with other priorities such as assistance for
unemployed workers and health care, Assistant U.S. Trade
Representative Everett Eissenstat said today.
"It's clear that trade agreements in the last few years have
been much too divisive," Eissenstat told the Senate Finance
Committee. "We want to make sure that Panama doesn't contribute
to that divisiveness."
Panama is the first of the three pending free-trade agreements
the Obama administration has said it wants Congress to
consider. Trade between the U.S. and Panama was $5.5 billion in
2008, and the U.S. is Panama's largest trading partner. A delay
for Panama may also postpone accords with Colombia and South
Korea.
Eissenstat's comments follow remarks by John Sweeney, the head
of the AFL-CIO labor federation, that unions would oppose a
rush to ratify the deal. The Panama accord was signed in 2007
and was viewed as the least controversial of three trade
agreements reached by President George W. Bush and pending
congressional approval.
Organized labor certainly isn't hesitant about telling everyone
who is calling the shots.
Exults the AFL-CIO:
BREAKING: President Obama has delayed moving the Panama
trade deal because of union objections. Read more
here.
Congress should not consider the U.S.-Panama trade agreement
until Panama implements labor law and tax reforms and the Obama
administration lays out a comprehensive, principled trade
strategy for the United States.
Testifying before the U.S. Senate Finance Committee today,
AFL-CIO Policy Director Thea Lee said the union movement will
oppose the Panama deal unless these issues are resolved.
Of course, even if Panamanian law was up to international
standards, whatever that means for an impoverished developing
nation, labor would oppose the FTA. Unions oppose
competition irrespective of other nations's labor laws.
We have just entered month five of the
administration. Wait till the president's popularity starts
to droop. He will have to embrace the Democratic special
interests even more tightly, irrespective of the public interest.
…Well, we know who really runs this administration. Obama & Co. have backed away from their professed support for the Free Trade Agreement with Panama. Reports… → Read full article… President Obama Takes Marching Order from Unions More: Lawmakers ask Obama to put off Panama trade deal (AP) Obama to lay out trade framework, work on Panama (Reuters) *Shakes Head* Obama to…
Murphy| 5.23.09 @ 2:36AM
Union-busting is a favorite activity of the fascist right.
Curtis Rasmussen| 5.23.09 @ 7:20PM
Murphy,
The air traffic controllers violated a regulation prohibiting
government unions from striking during the Reagan presidency.
Reagan had every right to can 11,345 controllers that refused to
go back to work. Look it up, idiot.
Fascist? I call the Obama takeover of Chrysler and federal stakes
in GM and private banks to be a fascist power grab. These little
Mussolinis are feverishly working to take healthcare away from
the private sector as well.
2 wrongs don't make a right, they expose you for the clueless
double douche that you are.
Oldefarte| 5.24.09 @ 3:06PM
Better to be a fascist than a F*****T, Murphy!!!! The unions were
once essential to this country's survival, especially during the
industrial revolution when companies' abusive practices
constituted sweatshop labor camps for its workers. Not any more,
thanks to a multitude of labor laws on the books which adequately
deal with humane company-labor relations. Labor unions today are
nothing but job killers, as they demand premium wages far above
the market wages demanded by the respective jobs. Their
economically/financially killing practices can be witnessed in
the current deathknell existence of the automotive and airline
industries. Detroit makes virtually the same vehicles as
Birmingham, except that the former pays 25% higher [union] wages.
Who benefits from this premium---the labor unions, not its
workers. The result is that Detroit [America's
manufacturers/union] is now dying, while the Birmingham [Japan's
manufacturers/non union] is economically/financially viable.
Why---because of UNIONS!!!!
Congrenike
outlet
ss should not consider the U.S.-Panama trade agreeadidas outletment until
Panama implements labor law and tax reforms and the Obama
administration lays out a comprehensive, principled trade
strategy for the United States.
Pingback| 5.22.09 @ 9:12PM
President Obama Takes Marching Order from Unions — ButAsForMe links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Murphy| 5.23.09 @ 2:36AM
Union-busting is a favorite activity of the fascist right.
Curtis Rasmussen| 5.23.09 @ 7:20PM
Murphy,
The air traffic controllers violated a regulation prohibiting government unions from striking during the Reagan presidency. Reagan had every right to can 11,345 controllers that refused to go back to work. Look it up, idiot.
Fascist? I call the Obama takeover of Chrysler and federal stakes in GM and private banks to be a fascist power grab. These little Mussolinis are feverishly working to take healthcare away from the private sector as well.
2 wrongs don't make a right, they expose you for the clueless double douche that you are.
Oldefarte| 5.24.09 @ 3:06PM
Better to be a fascist than a F*****T, Murphy!!!! The unions were once essential to this country's survival, especially during the industrial revolution when companies' abusive practices constituted sweatshop labor camps for its workers. Not any more, thanks to a multitude of labor laws on the books which adequately deal with humane company-labor relations. Labor unions today are nothing but job killers, as they demand premium wages far above the market wages demanded by the respective jobs. Their economically/financially killing practices can be witnessed in the current deathknell existence of the automotive and airline industries. Detroit makes virtually the same vehicles as Birmingham, except that the former pays 25% higher [union] wages. Who benefits from this premium---the labor unions, not its workers. The result is that Detroit [America's manufacturers/union] is now dying, while the Birmingham [Japan's manufacturers/non union] is economically/financially viable. Why---because of UNIONS!!!!
micky&vicky;| 9.4.09 @ 3:22AM
ghd Hair Straightener
classic ugg boots
alin| 1.10.10 @ 9:45PM
Congrenike outlet
ss should not consider the U.S.-Panama trade agreeadidas outletment until Panama implements labor law and tax reforms and the Obama administration lays out a comprehensive, principled trade strategy for the United States.
grany| 1.10.10 @ 9:51PM
nike shoes outlet
adidas shoes outlet