Bill Kristol has a
wonderful column out explaining why the GOP should thank its
lucky stars that Dick Cheney is out there in the public arena
fighting on behalf of strong tactics against terrorism. Writes
Kristol: "Dick Cheney--Darth Vader himself, Mr. Unpopularity, the
last guy you'd supposedly want out there making the case--stepped
onto the field. He's made himself the Most Valuable Republican of
the first four months of the Obama administration." Bingo.
At a lunch in the Veep's residence for about eight
conservative writers about 10 days before Cheney left office, we
asked Cheney why he had not been more active in the past eight
years in fighting in public to defend himself and the
administration he served. He explained that the more he was out
in public, the more the media would try to drive a wedge, whether
real or imaginary, between him and the president, and also the
more chances there would be for his public statements to be
interpreted (wrongly) as a way to supplement his private advice
to the president. For the president to fully and without
reservation trust that private advice would remain private, etc.,
Cheney said it was not wise for him to be front and center. (He
explained all this far more clearly than I just have.)
What struck me was just how non-egocentric Cheney's attitude was.
This was a man who really believed that his own image was of
secondary importance. This was a man who really believed that
Number Two should defer to Number One. And this was a man who
thought "big picture" rather than focusing on his immediate
personal perspective. It was admirable as could be.
I happened to disagree with Cheney. I thought that his ability to
concisely and forcefully frame issues was so important and could
be so useful to the administration that it should have overriden
those other considerations, especially in light of the
administration's weak communications performance for much of its
two terms. (Yes, Tony Snow and Dan Perino did good jobs behind
the podium every day toward the end of Bush's term, but the
overall communications strategy behind the press secretaries was
weak even with those highly competent and likable people doing
the most public work.) I think Cheney could have helped the
president make a far better case than was otherwise made.
Even so, as I say, I admired Cheney's decision not to so publicly
engage -- or at least admired the reasoning behind the decision.
But Kristol today helps explain why a different decision might
have warded off lots of grief: because Cheney is darn good at
making his case. He's also a patriot of the first order and a man
of old-fashioned virtues. Conservatives are fortunate to have him
out there making his case.
It's not the Republicans who should be thanking their lucky stars
Cheney is on television everyday defending torture. It's the
Democrats. And I'm sure they are.
Daisy| 5.15.09 @ 5:49PM
I'm sure Nazi Pelosi is not happy that CIA Director Leon Panetta
threw her under the bus today. Idiot democrats--you've turned the
torture issue against yourselves. Sometimes you get burned when
you play with fire, libtards. Dick Cheney is a hero!!
Old Texican| 5.15.09 @ 6:02PM
Quin...........AMEN AND AMEN!
Please see my thoughts under Cheney's indescresion (sic)
heh!
Dick is a man of a caliber we shall not see in office for a
while.
I don't thank my lucky stars...I thank The Lord God for men of
Mr. Cheney's quiet courage and dedication.
The Democrats can't shut up a man with that kind of courage, now
that he is a private citizen.
(Well...they could, but Americans could also shut our purse
strings for all their grand plans.)
Perhaps every American patriot should just "forget" to pay our
taxes like O's people.
Heh!
If one man refuses to pay his taxes, the IRS will make his life
miserable. If 80 million Americans refuse to pay for their own
destruction, then IRS accountants and their enforcers will find
life miserable. Heh!
Old Texican| 5.15.09 @ 6:11PM
DARN!!!!! DADGUM!!!!!
I just fooled around and got myself BACK on "The List"
Oh!
Tom and Jim and Dave and your fellow travelers...don't need to
enter in to this discussion since ya'll don't pay taxes. Heh!
I Conner Klast| 5.15.09 @ 6:41PM
The Left is in hysterics that Mr Obama is tacking right in
response to a few Cheney remarks on national security. The author
Jane Mayer ("Strange Justice") even spoke on NPR that Mr Cheney
feared being arrested and tried in some foreign court. It is time
we demand to know what intel was gleaned from terrorist leaders
who the CIA interogated.
jim rice| 5.15.09 @ 6:45PM
If that's really what dick thought and those were really his
motives for staying behind the scenes, then... well, damn. That's
pretty cool of him.
Coming out immediately as a new administration attempts to do
what they were elected to do is a little unclassy, but I can't
totally fault him for that either.
I admire that he seems to be sticking to his guns... but by the
same token it was that same kind of crap that made the bush
administration so ridiculously horrible for this country. A
narrow single-mindedness with a refusal to ever consider that
there is more than one side to every story. And that, holy crap,
it actually IS possible to be wrong.
cheney is a thief, ego-maniacal, and a dangerous dangerous man.
I'm glad he's out there talking too. If the Republican party will
ever distance themselves from this man like they've finally done
with george bush, I can finally start taking a serious look at
the candidates they field. He's an embarrassment, and I wish he'd
just go quietly into the dark. Or to jail where he belongs.
"Executive privilege," my ass.
Good for him for standing up for what he thinks. It's just too
bad that what he thinks is just so completely wrong.
Mary| 5.15.09 @ 7:37PM
Well said, Mr. Hillyer.
I'm a big fan of his and he's out there right now for two
reasons: 1) to defend himself and the administration he served,
and 2) to keep us cognizant of the fact that he knows just what
our enemies have in store for us, and to act as a counterweight
to the callow tendencies of this current administration.
Their refusal to release the memos Cheney requested is/was a full
vindication of his continued presence. He's a good man and a
patriot.
Newt was good today too. And he's right; it's an important
debate to have.
Off the subject a bit, but I've been reflecting on Cheney's
debate against the hapless and flaccid John Edwards. He [Edwards]
is right where he deserves to be right now because he's such a
insignificant little man.
And you know thinking of that debate made me think of GW's debate
w/Kerry when he tried to embarrass GW and the Cheney family with
his inclusion of Mary Cheney in the resolutely suspect debating
point he was trying to win. I don't often contribute to
peripheral political groups, but I sent a few skoots to the
Swiftboat Vets and they gave Kerry the fragging he so richly
deserved.
GW, whatever his shortcomings, is a noble soul; he never once
returned fire on those who came so viciously against him. It does
my petty little heart good to see Speaker Pelosi in the position
she's in. She's as left-of-the bellcurve as they come. Holy
smokes is that scary, or what?
Lastly, if you remember the election of 2004 when the dems/libs
tried to come at Cheney using his daughter Mary, you'll remember
the last night of the RN Convention when everyone was on stage
and Mary was bit far away from her Dad; he grabbed her and pulled
her to him in a way that so forcefully declared "this is my
daughter, and I lover her!" He's a good Dad with good kids. And
his daughter, Elizabeth is fighter too.
In the debate with Kerry, GW, when asked if he thought
homosexuality was genetic, so humbly and honestly replied: "I
don't know."
Obama and Holder started this scummy little war of politicization
that's broken out and may Cheney finish it for them.
He was a lineman for a utility company when he was a young man.
He knows both hard work and reward, and I think he took
protecting the Country seriously and I think he still does.
jim rice| 5.15.09 @ 8:10PM
he took it seriously insofar as he and his cronies stood to run
away with millions of dollars...
he should be begging the country for forgiveness.
Mary| 5.15.09 @ 8:27PM
No; you should be thanking him and GW for protecting you and
whatever family you might have.
If in 4 or 8 years the current adminstration keeps us protected,
I'll thank them as well.
Perfumed and protected; we all are. Protected by rough men who do
our dirty work for us and who always have. This "we were virgins
before the Bush administration" schtick is fit for Jonestowners
alone.
To quote a sharp poster over at Contentions who goes by the
handle usinkorea:
"After the initial knee-jerk rage that came with the memos, once
the masses began thinking in more depth about the issues and
their place in history, the momentum began switching over to the
Reps and Cheney (as I thought it would).
One of the next likely stages would have been — a backlash
against Obama and the Dems for putting the country through this
ordeal. I don’t want to get into the different aspects of it, but
it ranges from abuse of the FOIA to setting a foundation to damn
the bulk of American history."
Grow up for goodness sake, you're a man not a child.
You can make arguments without resorting to the worthless crap
you've put forward on this thread so far.
jim rice| 5.15.09 @ 8:54PM
I care less for my physical well-being than I do for my morality.
I care less for the continued existence of this country than I do
to see its good name drug through the mud. Some things are more
important than our independent worthless little lives. We're all
going to die; what we do in our lives will live forever. cheney,
bush, and their ilk made this world a more evil place.
MT| 5.15.09 @ 10:01PM
Worthless Jim, speak for yourself. If you care so little for your
sorry existence, please--by all means--off yourself. We won't
notice and we won't care. Thank you, Mr. Cheney!! Keep kicking
the democrats in the groin!! You are a true American Patriot!
mijattarab| 5.15.09 @ 10:22PM
Wow, Jim - You really suck hind tit.
mijattarab| 5.15.09 @ 10:23PM
Wow, Jim - You really suck hind tit.
nolan ryan| 5.15.09 @ 10:34PM
Jim Rice is quite simply a moron to the infinite degree. What
millions did Cheney make and where? That's what I thought. More
moveon talking points that fall apart when someone with even a
minuscule of grey matter thinks on their own. Nice try you
leftist dunce, but you're about as good as it gets when dealing
with obama worshiping socialists.
Basil Plumley| 5.16.09 @ 1:02AM
jim rice| 5.15.09 @ 8:54PM
I care less for my physical well-being than I do for my morality.
Really? You have morality? Your posts belie such piety.
You also said-I care less for the continued existence of this
country than I do to see its good name drug through the mud.
Speaking of good names, I hope the Hall of Famer Jim Rice doesn't
find out about you. Don't embarrass him any further.
Nice your post is very useful. Thanks for all of the sites you’ve
shared.
bluecollarbytes| 5.16.09 @ 7:47AM
See what happens whenever the Republicans get ONE 'loud'
politician in its ranks. Democrats, who have many many LOUD
members, full of accusations against the other side as a matter
of practice, will not stand by if even ONE Republican stands
his/her ground.
Do Republicans Want to fight this fight? I think they're still
mulling things over.
Hip Hip Hooray for Dick Cheney, still the very model of a truly
dedicated public servant in my opinion. Same goes for Lynn
Cheney.
He was a lineman for a utility company when he was a young
man.
He was a lineman because he drank himself out of Yale and I
suspect he didn't stop drinking then.
Mike| 5.16.09 @ 9:09AM
Bill Kristol is right about Dick Cheney? An interesting argument.
A rather convincing counter argument can be made that Mr. Cheney,
who enjoys an 8% approval rating, is the best thing the Democrats
have going for them in light of the current Nancy Pelosi fiasco.
Along with Rush Limbaugh, the dynamic dual are rapidly defining
the Republican Party in a way that many Republicans think will
guarantee its demise. Democrats hope these Republicans are
correct in their analysis and are enjoying the fact that Cheney
and Limbaugh are the face to the GOP. Perhaps the pendulum will
swing and the GOP will be able to win without changing. Data
concerning demographic trends and attitudes suggest otherwise. I
doubt defending the Bush administration and hewing to hard right
ideology are the path to future success, but time will tell.
Mary| 5.16.09 @ 10:26AM
Wail all you want; Cheney is a strength not a weakness. Whatever
his approval rating; he's like E.F. Hutton, people listen when he
speaks.
You guys have a couple of left-of-the bellcurve congressional
leaders. It's best to admit that. Republicans really don't have
to do anything to advance that knowledge to the Country. It's on
reel; it's on now!
Polls (since truth seems to be measured by polls, in certain dem
quarters) show that two-thirds of the American people think it's
time that Obama stop blaming President Bush and "gets back to
work for the American people." I've seen a couple of "I miss
Bill" bumper stickers. On high-end vehicles, of course. :)
Cheney's approval rating means nothing. Nothing. Carville
probably wouldn't fare much better, but he's an asset to the
dems. And Vice-President and Mensch Cheney is an asset to
conservatives, as is his daughter Elizabeth.
That the Republicans lack courage and coherence goes without
saying, but it doesn't solve your voyeuristic problem regarding
naming he head of the party for them.
Rush's ratings have never been better and that means nothing for
the Republican party, just as it would mean nothing if they'd
tanked.
Nobody thinks Rush is the head of the Republican party except the
left-of-the bellcurve talk personalities on MSNBC: you know, the
AG-Tech tag team.
Coulter, whatever her excesses, hammered that wide-assed
Olbermann right in the sweet spot. He whipped out his diploma;
for goodness sake like he had it hanging around. What a raging,
andropause approaching mama's boy!
William Raspberry, God bless him, wrote a nasty piece about Rush
long ago and, honest man that he is, took the advice of some of
his critics and actually listened to his show and then offered an
apology in writing.
You guys have nothing in the tank except unreality.
If Obama is trying to rid himself of Pelosi, that would be wise.
She authored the stimulus bill, after all. An unlucky break for
Republicans, to be sure, because she's making almost all of the
numbers (again, boys, the polls, read 'em and weep) that favored
dems in the autumn of 2008 tip towards Republicans. You seem to
have forgotten how quickly people forget; how fickle the "mob"
is. Tsk, tsk.
Oh another poll just out, and wouldn't you know, it contradicts
the current assertions of General Powell: Americans want
government and government spending to abate.
I believe the "narrative" is going to be slipping away from you
more and more, and as a consequence, sagacity requires that we
all remember that a vibrant and healthy country needs a loyal
opposition; emphasis on loyal.
For the third and last time, VP Cheney is an asset whose value
you can't diminish without unleashing a boomeranging Hell
awaiting the demise of this administration and those it's trying
to illegitimately take down through an unprecedented
politicization process.
I'll leave you with fine words from a countryman of mine:
As to the people's capacity of judging of things, it is
exceedingly rare that, when they hear two orators of equal
talents advocate different measures, they do not decide in favor
of the best of the two; which proves their ability to discern the
truth of what they hear. - Niccoló Machiavelli, The Discourses.
1517.
Mike| 5.16.09 @ 12:31PM
Mary writes: "Wail all you want; Cheney is a strength not a
weakness. Whatever his approval rating; he's like E.F. Hutton,
people listen when he speaks."
8% listen and approve. Of the remaining 92 % who are paying any
attention to this, most are either cringing or laughing and
wishing Mr. Cheney would go away.
Becky| 5.16.09 @ 2:19PM
I always did and still do like Mr. Cheney.
A very small percentage of the population actually understand
very much about history and American civics, and a larger
majority are oblivious to much. Asking people who cannot name the
three branches of government their opinion is not saying much.
Churchill was extremely unpopular prior to WWII.
The morality and importance of popularity is juvinille.
Daisy| 5.16.09 @ 4:23PM
Whine all you want, dummocrats--Cheney is here to stay! He's got
Obummer & Co. backpedaling like crazy. Rush and VP Cheney are
my heroes. Get those libs!!
Basil Plumley| 5.16.09 @ 6:17PM
@ Mike
You said--8% listen and approve. Of the remaining 92 % who are
paying any attention to this, most are either cringing or
laughing and wishing Mr. Cheney would go away.
If (and I really mean if) what you post is true, then why does
Cheney still make news and why doesn't the Obama Administration
confront him?
After all, isn't the "truth" on your side?
Let's face it, you have a gutless wonder as POTUS. I am sure that
plays well where ever you're from.
Murphy| 5.16.09 @ 7:17PM
Torture is evil.
jim rice| 5.16.09 @ 7:35PM
yes, Mike. Torture is evil. cheney is evil. Pelosi needs to step
down. cheney needs to be behind bars. Or dead with a dick in his
ass. I don't care which.
Richard Baker| 5.16.09 @ 8:20PM
To Jim Rice:
You need professional mental health care. It's easy to speak
nonsense and you've proved that. Remember, it is better to be
thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt
As to Cheney being wrong, would you rather fight Al-Queda in our
streets and suffer thousands of deaths? This isn't a video game
where you hit the RESET button after the virtual carnage is
through. Is that what would make you happy? Again, you need help.
MT| 5.16.09 @ 9:02PM
Worthless Jim got one thing right: Nazi Pelosi needs to step
down. Now. The other things not so much. Tool.
Murphy| 5.16.09 @ 9:34PM
MT --
What makes you think Pelosi is a "Nazi"?
I thought the Nazis were a political party in Germany in the 30s
and 40s.
Oh.... wait a minute. I get it.
You say "Nazi Pelosi" because "Nazi" sounds like "Nancy," which
is the Speaker's first name.
See, if you substitute a person's name with a bad word that
sounds like it, you've made a joke.
The joke is that even though we all know her name is Nancy, we
laugh because we're saying she's really a Nazi -- even though we
know she's not a Nazi.
I think I'm catching on.
Murphy| 5.16.09 @ 9:37PM
It's kind of like Daisy, who calls Democrats "dummocrats."
The word "dummocrats" sounds like "Democrats," only it has the
word "dumb" sort of lodged inside it, like the spring a
jack-in-the-box that offers a surprise if you turn the crank.
I think I'm beginning to see why liberals always lose in the
"marketplace of ideas."
There's no way we could ever compete with you guys.
Dummocrats. Geez, Louise. I wish I'd thought of that.
MT| 5.16.09 @ 10:47PM
The only idea you dummocraps have is corruption; you have turned
it into an art form. Otherwise, you've got nothin'. Actually,
it's nazi because Pelosi IS a lying nazi. I hope she gets her
treasonous butt booted out of congress. She's a disgrace.
BAsil Plumley| 5.17.09 @ 12:27AM
@ MT
You said-The only idea you dummocraps have is corruption; you
have turned it into an art form.
When it comes to corruption, the GOP are rank amateurs. The Dems
are professionals.
It's a shame that folks like Murphy are just catching on.
Murphy| 5.17.09 @ 11:44AM
MT
That's a brilliant political analysis. What an awesome analytic
mind you have. Fascinating. No...really. What you say is
fascinating, just fascinating. Are you a brain surgeon? How did
you get to know so much?
Richard Baker| 5.17.09 @ 12:52PM
To Basil Plumley:
Sergeant Major, for an 89 year old you DO get around, don't you?
MT| 5.17.09 @ 1:46PM
As usual, liberals like Murphy have no ideas. He/she doesn't even
try to rebut my assertion that democrats are hopelessly corrupt.
2010 can't come soon enough.
Angel| 5.17.09 @ 1:50PM
Mr. Plumley must have some damn fine genetics--quick-witted and
articulate as hell for a gentleman of his many years! ;)
Murphy| 5.17.09 @ 2:50PM
MT --
What assertion? All you do is hurl inarticulate opinions mixed
with puerile jokes about people's names.
Sorry. You have to make an argument before I'll respond.
But since I'm in a good mood, I'll give a clue what I mean by an
"argument."
An argument is a claim or series of claims for which you offer
some kind of support or what we call a "warrant."
Example:
MT's post are not worth responding to because they don't make an
argument.
-- "because they don't make an argument" is a warrant to the
claim that your posts aren't worth responding to.
Murphy| 5.17.09 @ 2:53PM
Here would be an example:
I call Nancy Pelosi a "Nazi" because she endorses anti-Semitic
laws. She has also supported the activities of leading white
supremacists like David Duke. In addition, she's a Holocaust
denier. Finally, I accuse Pelosi of being a "Nazi" because she
wears a swastika when she leaves home at night to participate in
San Francisco pogroms.
That's what an argument might sound like.
Think you can manage that, Socrates?
MT| 5.17.09 @ 6:50PM
She's a lying fascist, tool. Can you extrapolate? Are you trying
to deny that Nazi Pelosi is lying about the CIA? If you believe
her you're even more stupid than most of your fellow libfools.
Murphy| 5.17.09 @ 6:52PM
MT --
Yes, because the CIA never lies. Oh, no.
Senator Graham, a Republican, is now backing up Pelosi and saying
that her recollection of these briefings matches with his.
Now is Senator Graham a "nazi"?
ds80| 5.17.09 @ 7:52PM
jim rice: "... Or dead with ... (etc)."
jim rice: small-minded, potty-mouth *child*.
ds80| 5.17.09 @ 7:53PM
Murphy: "Senator Graham, a Republican, is now backing up Pelosi
..."
Graham? Shamnesty Graham? No credibility.
MT| 5.17.09 @ 8:22PM
Come now, Murphy; sure you want to bet against the CIA that takes
fastidious notes about EVERY meeting they have with congress? You
aren't that dumb, are you? Why is Nazi backpedaling so quickly,
then? Porter Goss, the congressman who actually attended the same
meeting with Pelosi, asserted that the CIA did brief Pelosi and
him about enhanced interrogation techniques. I hear there are
videos that were shown at the briefings, too. Dumb
liberal--you're almost as stupid as Nazi P.
MT| 5.17.09 @ 11:04PM
C'mon, Murph--out with it. Where's you next impassioned BS
defense of Nazi Pelosi? Tool.
Basil Plumley| 5.18.09 @ 12:59AM
ds80| 5.17.09 @ 7:53PM
Murphy: "Senator Graham, a Republican, is now backing up Pelosi
..."
Graham? Shamnesty Graham? No credibility
Actually, I think the poster Murphy is thinking of the Democrat
Bob Graham, the former Senator from FL. I wonder if Bob Graham
really wants to get involved in this fiasco.
Murphy's command of logic and facts reminds me of Tommy
Pain/Jeremiah. Another change of handles?
ruth| 5.18.09 @ 2:45AM
Yeah, I think so, Basil. Jeremiah threw some F-bombs and suddenly
morphed into TP. TP threw the C word around and suddenly Murph
appeared. Or maybe this crazy troll just has a split personality
a la Sybil. Hey, where's Bob? Do you miss torturing (enhanced
interrogating) him?
Ran| 5.18.09 @ 8:11AM
Mr. Hillyer,
"He's made himself the Most Valuable Republican of the first
four months of the Obama administration." Ahh yess...
"Gravitas."
The Left side of the MSM unanimously agreed that Dick Cheney
provided the substantive intellectual heft lacking in the then
new President. Now it's back to bite 'em.
Ruth... Good ol' Bob was banned from posting here on Quin's
articles for telling outright lies. I think it was last New
Year's Eve.
ruth| 5.18.09 @ 2:07PM
Oh, you're right, Ran--I forgot. Ha ha. But I haven't seen the
old fool anywhere, have you? Maybe Bob was just another of
Jeremiah's split personalities. Either Jeremiah is nuts or he's
getting paid big bucks by Axelrod. Axelrod is one ugly
dude--inside and out! Yuk!
Ran| 5.18.09 @ 9:52PM
Hi Ruth,
No, not seen him. Gorgeous day, huh?
ruth| 5.18.09 @ 11:23PM
Yes, the sun does seem to be shining brighter.
Oldefarte| 5.22.09 @ 4:35PM
Cheney insinuates that Obama make us vulnerable to future
terrorists' attacks; while Obama insinuates that Cheney is
fear-mongering. Unfortionately, the former is true, while the
latter is false; and there will probably be a tremendous human
toll because of this!!!!!
Pingback| 5.15.09 @ 4:40PM
Kristol is Right That Cheney is Right | But As For Me links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
William R| 5.15.09 @ 5:06PM
The Neocons Really DO Hate the GOP
http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/026808.html
Tom Paine| 5.15.09 @ 5:33PM
It's not the Republicans who should be thanking their lucky stars Cheney is on television everyday defending torture. It's the Democrats. And I'm sure they are.
Daisy| 5.15.09 @ 5:49PM
I'm sure Nazi Pelosi is not happy that CIA Director Leon Panetta threw her under the bus today. Idiot democrats--you've turned the torture issue against yourselves. Sometimes you get burned when you play with fire, libtards. Dick Cheney is a hero!!
Old Texican| 5.15.09 @ 6:02PM
Quin...........AMEN AND AMEN!
Please see my thoughts under Cheney's indescresion (sic) heh!
Dick is a man of a caliber we shall not see in office for a while.
I don't thank my lucky stars...I thank The Lord God for men of Mr. Cheney's quiet courage and dedication.
The Democrats can't shut up a man with that kind of courage, now that he is a private citizen.
(Well...they could, but Americans could also shut our purse strings for all their grand plans.)
Perhaps every American patriot should just "forget" to pay our taxes like O's people.
Heh!
If one man refuses to pay his taxes, the IRS will make his life miserable. If 80 million Americans refuse to pay for their own destruction, then IRS accountants and their enforcers will find life miserable. Heh!
Old Texican| 5.15.09 @ 6:11PM
DARN!!!!! DADGUM!!!!!
I just fooled around and got myself BACK on "The List"
Oh!
Tom and Jim and Dave and your fellow travelers...don't need to enter in to this discussion since ya'll don't pay taxes. Heh!
I Conner Klast| 5.15.09 @ 6:41PM
The Left is in hysterics that Mr Obama is tacking right in response to a few Cheney remarks on national security. The author Jane Mayer ("Strange Justice") even spoke on NPR that Mr Cheney feared being arrested and tried in some foreign court. It is time we demand to know what intel was gleaned from terrorist leaders who the CIA interogated.
jim rice| 5.15.09 @ 6:45PM
If that's really what dick thought and those were really his motives for staying behind the scenes, then... well, damn. That's pretty cool of him.
Coming out immediately as a new administration attempts to do what they were elected to do is a little unclassy, but I can't totally fault him for that either.
I admire that he seems to be sticking to his guns... but by the same token it was that same kind of crap that made the bush administration so ridiculously horrible for this country. A narrow single-mindedness with a refusal to ever consider that there is more than one side to every story. And that, holy crap, it actually IS possible to be wrong.
cheney is a thief, ego-maniacal, and a dangerous dangerous man. I'm glad he's out there talking too. If the Republican party will ever distance themselves from this man like they've finally done with george bush, I can finally start taking a serious look at the candidates they field. He's an embarrassment, and I wish he'd just go quietly into the dark. Or to jail where he belongs. "Executive privilege," my ass.
Good for him for standing up for what he thinks. It's just too bad that what he thinks is just so completely wrong.
Mary| 5.15.09 @ 7:37PM
Well said, Mr. Hillyer.
I'm a big fan of his and he's out there right now for two reasons: 1) to defend himself and the administration he served, and 2) to keep us cognizant of the fact that he knows just what our enemies have in store for us, and to act as a counterweight to the callow tendencies of this current administration.
Their refusal to release the memos Cheney requested is/was a full vindication of his continued presence. He's a good man and a patriot. Newt was good today too. And he's right; it's an important debate to have.
Off the subject a bit, but I've been reflecting on Cheney's debate against the hapless and flaccid John Edwards. He [Edwards] is right where he deserves to be right now because he's such a insignificant little man.
And you know thinking of that debate made me think of GW's debate w/Kerry when he tried to embarrass GW and the Cheney family with his inclusion of Mary Cheney in the resolutely suspect debating point he was trying to win. I don't often contribute to peripheral political groups, but I sent a few skoots to the Swiftboat Vets and they gave Kerry the fragging he so richly deserved.
GW, whatever his shortcomings, is a noble soul; he never once returned fire on those who came so viciously against him. It does my petty little heart good to see Speaker Pelosi in the position she's in. She's as left-of-the bellcurve as they come. Holy smokes is that scary, or what?
Lastly, if you remember the election of 2004 when the dems/libs tried to come at Cheney using his daughter Mary, you'll remember the last night of the RN Convention when everyone was on stage and Mary was bit far away from her Dad; he grabbed her and pulled her to him in a way that so forcefully declared "this is my daughter, and I lover her!" He's a good Dad with good kids. And his daughter, Elizabeth is fighter too.
In the debate with Kerry, GW, when asked if he thought homosexuality was genetic, so humbly and honestly replied: "I don't know."
Obama and Holder started this scummy little war of politicization that's broken out and may Cheney finish it for them.
He was a lineman for a utility company when he was a young man. He knows both hard work and reward, and I think he took protecting the Country seriously and I think he still does.
jim rice| 5.15.09 @ 8:10PM
he took it seriously insofar as he and his cronies stood to run away with millions of dollars...
he should be begging the country for forgiveness.
Mary| 5.15.09 @ 8:27PM
No; you should be thanking him and GW for protecting you and whatever family you might have.
If in 4 or 8 years the current adminstration keeps us protected, I'll thank them as well.
Perfumed and protected; we all are. Protected by rough men who do our dirty work for us and who always have. This "we were virgins before the Bush administration" schtick is fit for Jonestowners alone.
To quote a sharp poster over at Contentions who goes by the handle usinkorea:
"After the initial knee-jerk rage that came with the memos, once the masses began thinking in more depth about the issues and their place in history, the momentum began switching over to the Reps and Cheney (as I thought it would).
One of the next likely stages would have been — a backlash against Obama and the Dems for putting the country through this ordeal. I don’t want to get into the different aspects of it, but it ranges from abuse of the FOIA to setting a foundation to damn the bulk of American history."
Grow up for goodness sake, you're a man not a child.
You can make arguments without resorting to the worthless crap you've put forward on this thread so far.
jim rice| 5.15.09 @ 8:54PM
I care less for my physical well-being than I do for my morality. I care less for the continued existence of this country than I do to see its good name drug through the mud. Some things are more important than our independent worthless little lives. We're all going to die; what we do in our lives will live forever. cheney, bush, and their ilk made this world a more evil place.
MT| 5.15.09 @ 10:01PM
Worthless Jim, speak for yourself. If you care so little for your sorry existence, please--by all means--off yourself. We won't notice and we won't care. Thank you, Mr. Cheney!! Keep kicking the democrats in the groin!! You are a true American Patriot!
mijattarab| 5.15.09 @ 10:22PM
Wow, Jim - You really suck hind tit.
mijattarab| 5.15.09 @ 10:23PM
Wow, Jim - You really suck hind tit.
nolan ryan| 5.15.09 @ 10:34PM
Jim Rice is quite simply a moron to the infinite degree. What millions did Cheney make and where? That's what I thought. More moveon talking points that fall apart when someone with even a minuscule of grey matter thinks on their own. Nice try you leftist dunce, but you're about as good as it gets when dealing with obama worshiping socialists.
Basil Plumley| 5.16.09 @ 1:02AM
jim rice| 5.15.09 @ 8:54PM
I care less for my physical well-being than I do for my morality.
Really? You have morality? Your posts belie such piety.
You also said-I care less for the continued existence of this country than I do to see its good name drug through the mud.
Speaking of good names, I hope the Hall of Famer Jim Rice doesn't find out about you. Don't embarrass him any further.
resveratrol| 5.16.09 @ 2:25AM
Nice your post is very useful. Thanks for all of the sites you’ve shared.
bluecollarbytes| 5.16.09 @ 7:47AM
See what happens whenever the Republicans get ONE 'loud' politician in its ranks. Democrats, who have many many LOUD members, full of accusations against the other side as a matter of practice, will not stand by if even ONE Republican stands his/her ground.
Do Republicans Want to fight this fight? I think they're still mulling things over.
Hip Hip Hooray for Dick Cheney, still the very model of a truly dedicated public servant in my opinion. Same goes for Lynn Cheney.
Steve J.| 5.16.09 @ 8:34AM
He was a lineman for a utility company when he was a young man.
He was a lineman because he drank himself out of Yale and I suspect he didn't stop drinking then.
Mike| 5.16.09 @ 9:09AM
Bill Kristol is right about Dick Cheney? An interesting argument. A rather convincing counter argument can be made that Mr. Cheney, who enjoys an 8% approval rating, is the best thing the Democrats have going for them in light of the current Nancy Pelosi fiasco. Along with Rush Limbaugh, the dynamic dual are rapidly defining the Republican Party in a way that many Republicans think will guarantee its demise. Democrats hope these Republicans are correct in their analysis and are enjoying the fact that Cheney and Limbaugh are the face to the GOP. Perhaps the pendulum will swing and the GOP will be able to win without changing. Data concerning demographic trends and attitudes suggest otherwise. I doubt defending the Bush administration and hewing to hard right ideology are the path to future success, but time will tell.
Mary| 5.16.09 @ 10:26AM
Wail all you want; Cheney is a strength not a weakness. Whatever his approval rating; he's like E.F. Hutton, people listen when he speaks.
You guys have a couple of left-of-the bellcurve congressional leaders. It's best to admit that. Republicans really don't have to do anything to advance that knowledge to the Country. It's on reel; it's on now!
Polls (since truth seems to be measured by polls, in certain dem quarters) show that two-thirds of the American people think it's time that Obama stop blaming President Bush and "gets back to work for the American people." I've seen a couple of "I miss Bill" bumper stickers. On high-end vehicles, of course. :)
Cheney's approval rating means nothing. Nothing. Carville probably wouldn't fare much better, but he's an asset to the dems. And Vice-President and Mensch Cheney is an asset to conservatives, as is his daughter Elizabeth.
That the Republicans lack courage and coherence goes without saying, but it doesn't solve your voyeuristic problem regarding naming he head of the party for them.
Rush's ratings have never been better and that means nothing for the Republican party, just as it would mean nothing if they'd tanked.
Nobody thinks Rush is the head of the Republican party except the left-of-the bellcurve talk personalities on MSNBC: you know, the AG-Tech tag team.
Coulter, whatever her excesses, hammered that wide-assed Olbermann right in the sweet spot. He whipped out his diploma; for goodness sake like he had it hanging around. What a raging, andropause approaching mama's boy!
William Raspberry, God bless him, wrote a nasty piece about Rush long ago and, honest man that he is, took the advice of some of his critics and actually listened to his show and then offered an apology in writing.
You guys have nothing in the tank except unreality.
If Obama is trying to rid himself of Pelosi, that would be wise. She authored the stimulus bill, after all. An unlucky break for Republicans, to be sure, because she's making almost all of the numbers (again, boys, the polls, read 'em and weep) that favored dems in the autumn of 2008 tip towards Republicans. You seem to have forgotten how quickly people forget; how fickle the "mob" is. Tsk, tsk.
Oh another poll just out, and wouldn't you know, it contradicts the current assertions of General Powell: Americans want government and government spending to abate.
I believe the "narrative" is going to be slipping away from you more and more, and as a consequence, sagacity requires that we all remember that a vibrant and healthy country needs a loyal opposition; emphasis on loyal.
For the third and last time, VP Cheney is an asset whose value you can't diminish without unleashing a boomeranging Hell awaiting the demise of this administration and those it's trying to illegitimately take down through an unprecedented politicization process.
I'll leave you with fine words from a countryman of mine:
As to the people's capacity of judging of things, it is exceedingly rare that, when they hear two orators of equal talents advocate different measures, they do not decide in favor of the best of the two; which proves their ability to discern the truth of what they hear. - Niccoló Machiavelli, The Discourses. 1517.
Mike| 5.16.09 @ 12:31PM
Mary writes: "Wail all you want; Cheney is a strength not a weakness. Whatever his approval rating; he's like E.F. Hutton, people listen when he speaks."
8% listen and approve. Of the remaining 92 % who are paying any attention to this, most are either cringing or laughing and wishing Mr. Cheney would go away.
Becky| 5.16.09 @ 2:19PM
I always did and still do like Mr. Cheney.
A very small percentage of the population actually understand very much about history and American civics, and a larger majority are oblivious to much. Asking people who cannot name the three branches of government their opinion is not saying much.
Churchill was extremely unpopular prior to WWII.
The morality and importance of popularity is juvinille.
Daisy| 5.16.09 @ 4:23PM
Whine all you want, dummocrats--Cheney is here to stay! He's got Obummer & Co. backpedaling like crazy. Rush and VP Cheney are my heroes. Get those libs!!
Basil Plumley| 5.16.09 @ 6:17PM
@ Mike
You said--8% listen and approve. Of the remaining 92 % who are paying any attention to this, most are either cringing or laughing and wishing Mr. Cheney would go away.
If (and I really mean if) what you post is true, then why does Cheney still make news and why doesn't the Obama Administration confront him?
After all, isn't the "truth" on your side?
Let's face it, you have a gutless wonder as POTUS. I am sure that plays well where ever you're from.
Murphy| 5.16.09 @ 7:17PM
Torture is evil.
jim rice| 5.16.09 @ 7:35PM
yes, Mike. Torture is evil. cheney is evil. Pelosi needs to step down. cheney needs to be behind bars. Or dead with a dick in his ass. I don't care which.
Richard Baker| 5.16.09 @ 8:20PM
To Jim Rice:
You need professional mental health care. It's easy to speak nonsense and you've proved that. Remember, it is better to be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt
As to Cheney being wrong, would you rather fight Al-Queda in our streets and suffer thousands of deaths? This isn't a video game where you hit the RESET button after the virtual carnage is through. Is that what would make you happy? Again, you need help.
MT| 5.16.09 @ 9:02PM
Worthless Jim got one thing right: Nazi Pelosi needs to step down. Now. The other things not so much. Tool.
Murphy| 5.16.09 @ 9:34PM
MT --
What makes you think Pelosi is a "Nazi"?
I thought the Nazis were a political party in Germany in the 30s and 40s.
Oh.... wait a minute. I get it.
You say "Nazi Pelosi" because "Nazi" sounds like "Nancy," which is the Speaker's first name.
See, if you substitute a person's name with a bad word that sounds like it, you've made a joke.
The joke is that even though we all know her name is Nancy, we laugh because we're saying she's really a Nazi -- even though we know she's not a Nazi.
I think I'm catching on.
Murphy| 5.16.09 @ 9:37PM
It's kind of like Daisy, who calls Democrats "dummocrats."
The word "dummocrats" sounds like "Democrats," only it has the word "dumb" sort of lodged inside it, like the spring a jack-in-the-box that offers a surprise if you turn the crank.
I think I'm beginning to see why liberals always lose in the "marketplace of ideas."
There's no way we could ever compete with you guys.
Dummocrats. Geez, Louise. I wish I'd thought of that.
MT| 5.16.09 @ 10:47PM
The only idea you dummocraps have is corruption; you have turned it into an art form. Otherwise, you've got nothin'. Actually, it's nazi because Pelosi IS a lying nazi. I hope she gets her treasonous butt booted out of congress. She's a disgrace.
BAsil Plumley| 5.17.09 @ 12:27AM
@ MT
You said-The only idea you dummocraps have is corruption; you have turned it into an art form.
When it comes to corruption, the GOP are rank amateurs. The Dems are professionals.
It's a shame that folks like Murphy are just catching on.
Murphy| 5.17.09 @ 11:44AM
MT
That's a brilliant political analysis. What an awesome analytic mind you have. Fascinating. No...really. What you say is fascinating, just fascinating. Are you a brain surgeon? How did you get to know so much?
Richard Baker| 5.17.09 @ 12:52PM
To Basil Plumley:
Sergeant Major, for an 89 year old you DO get around, don't you?
MT| 5.17.09 @ 1:46PM
As usual, liberals like Murphy have no ideas. He/she doesn't even try to rebut my assertion that democrats are hopelessly corrupt. 2010 can't come soon enough.
Angel| 5.17.09 @ 1:50PM
Mr. Plumley must have some damn fine genetics--quick-witted and articulate as hell for a gentleman of his many years! ;)
Murphy| 5.17.09 @ 2:50PM
MT --
What assertion? All you do is hurl inarticulate opinions mixed with puerile jokes about people's names.
Sorry. You have to make an argument before I'll respond.
But since I'm in a good mood, I'll give a clue what I mean by an "argument."
An argument is a claim or series of claims for which you offer some kind of support or what we call a "warrant."
Example:
MT's post are not worth responding to because they don't make an argument.
-- "because they don't make an argument" is a warrant to the claim that your posts aren't worth responding to.
Murphy| 5.17.09 @ 2:53PM
Here would be an example:
I call Nancy Pelosi a "Nazi" because she endorses anti-Semitic laws. She has also supported the activities of leading white supremacists like David Duke. In addition, she's a Holocaust denier. Finally, I accuse Pelosi of being a "Nazi" because she wears a swastika when she leaves home at night to participate in San Francisco pogroms.
That's what an argument might sound like.
Think you can manage that, Socrates?
MT| 5.17.09 @ 6:50PM
She's a lying fascist, tool. Can you extrapolate? Are you trying to deny that Nazi Pelosi is lying about the CIA? If you believe her you're even more stupid than most of your fellow libfools.
Murphy| 5.17.09 @ 6:52PM
MT --
Yes, because the CIA never lies. Oh, no.
Senator Graham, a Republican, is now backing up Pelosi and saying that her recollection of these briefings matches with his.
Now is Senator Graham a "nazi"?
ds80| 5.17.09 @ 7:52PM
jim rice: "... Or dead with ... (etc)."
jim rice: small-minded, potty-mouth *child*.
ds80| 5.17.09 @ 7:53PM
Murphy: "Senator Graham, a Republican, is now backing up Pelosi ..."
Graham? Shamnesty Graham? No credibility.
MT| 5.17.09 @ 8:22PM
Come now, Murphy; sure you want to bet against the CIA that takes fastidious notes about EVERY meeting they have with congress? You aren't that dumb, are you? Why is Nazi backpedaling so quickly, then? Porter Goss, the congressman who actually attended the same meeting with Pelosi, asserted that the CIA did brief Pelosi and him about enhanced interrogation techniques. I hear there are videos that were shown at the briefings, too. Dumb liberal--you're almost as stupid as Nazi P.
MT| 5.17.09 @ 11:04PM
C'mon, Murph--out with it. Where's you next impassioned BS defense of Nazi Pelosi? Tool.
Basil Plumley| 5.18.09 @ 12:59AM
ds80| 5.17.09 @ 7:53PM
Murphy: "Senator Graham, a Republican, is now backing up Pelosi ..."
Graham? Shamnesty Graham? No credibility
Actually, I think the poster Murphy is thinking of the Democrat Bob Graham, the former Senator from FL. I wonder if Bob Graham really wants to get involved in this fiasco.
Murphy's command of logic and facts reminds me of Tommy Pain/Jeremiah. Another change of handles?
ruth| 5.18.09 @ 2:45AM
Yeah, I think so, Basil. Jeremiah threw some F-bombs and suddenly morphed into TP. TP threw the C word around and suddenly Murph appeared. Or maybe this crazy troll just has a split personality a la Sybil. Hey, where's Bob? Do you miss torturing (enhanced interrogating) him?
Ran| 5.18.09 @ 8:11AM
Mr. Hillyer,
"He's made himself the Most Valuable Republican of the first four months of the Obama administration." Ahh yess... "Gravitas."
The Left side of the MSM unanimously agreed that Dick Cheney provided the substantive intellectual heft lacking in the then new President. Now it's back to bite 'em.
Ruth... Good ol' Bob was banned from posting here on Quin's articles for telling outright lies. I think it was last New Year's Eve.
ruth| 5.18.09 @ 2:07PM
Oh, you're right, Ran--I forgot. Ha ha. But I haven't seen the old fool anywhere, have you? Maybe Bob was just another of Jeremiah's split personalities. Either Jeremiah is nuts or he's getting paid big bucks by Axelrod. Axelrod is one ugly dude--inside and out! Yuk!
Ran| 5.18.09 @ 9:52PM
Hi Ruth,
No, not seen him. Gorgeous day, huh?
ruth| 5.18.09 @ 11:23PM
Yes, the sun does seem to be shining brighter.
Oldefarte| 5.22.09 @ 4:35PM
Cheney insinuates that Obama make us vulnerable to future terrorists' attacks; while Obama insinuates that Cheney is fear-mongering. Unfortionately, the former is true, while the latter is false; and there will probably be a tremendous human toll because of this!!!!!
wrinkle cream| 5.29.09 @ 2:03AM
i thing this article should be more interesting if u include some more valuable information
anti aging products| 6.9.09 @ 2:28AM
Really very informative and interesting site.
Thanks for sharing it. it’s valuable information all of us
Facelift Cream| 6.30.09 @ 12:55AM
hmmmm. ya i definitely agree with u of course what a great site & valuable information give me
Resveratrol Ultra| 7.1.09 @ 1:02AM
I really enjoy reading your article. Keep it up the good work.
micky&vicky;| 9.4.09 @ 3:19AM
ghd Hair Straightener
classic ugg boots