The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

George Stephanopoulos says he has spoken to former staffers of John Edwards who claimed they hatched "doomsday" strategy to end his campaign if it looked like he was actually going to win the Democratic nomination, since his affair might have jeopardized the Democrats' general election chances. I have no idea if this is true or just self-serving, after-the-fact nonsense but it does raise a question: What kind of people work on a campaign they think would be a disaster for their party and country if it were successful?

This entire Edwards spectacle has been revolting. First, Edwards decides to run for president while behaving in such a manner, as if the country was in such dire need of his services. His wife, suffering from cancer that is incurable and likely terminal, plays a starring role in that campaign. Then Edwards is disgraced and Elizabeth Edwards is extending her 15 minutes of fame by continuing to keep this personal tragedy in the public spotlight. Now we hear about Edwards staffers who were preparing a kamikaze mission in the event that their sales job in Iowa succeeded in reviving the flagging presidential campaign for which they worked.

Is there anyone with any decency in this political circle? The level of self-absorption on display here -- and remember, the Edwardses have children -- is almost unbelievable, even by Washington standards.

View all comments (3) | Leave a comment

Tim| 5.11.09 @ 12:54PM

Rick: How can you close me up? On what grounds?
Captain Renault: I'm shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on in here!
[a croupier hands Renault a pile of money]
Croupier: Your winnings, sir.
Captain Renault: [sotto voce] Oh, thank you very much.
[aloud]
Captain Renault: Everybody out at once!

Daisy| 5.11.09 @ 1:16PM

What's really revolting is that The National Enquirer was the only news outlet that investigated this scandal. So much for the 'watchdog' press. The Mainstream Media treachery continues.

Eric Damon| 5.12.09 @ 10:10AM

Doomsday, eh? Am I supposed to be believe that a party which lionized JFK and went to the damned mat defending BJC from charges that included sexual harrasment, adultery, and rape would have abandoned a winner over an affair? You're damned skippy!

They would have done what they always do: cover-up as along as possible, then blame the GOP attack dogs in the press for telling such vicious lies about the candidate. Liz Edwards would have been out defending him even more vigorously than she did in the campaign, and the lapdog media would have been riding shotgun to safeguard his candidacy. But these political animals would have given up a chance to win the White House because their morals were disturbed? Riiiiiight-O!

C'mon Grandpa...tell me another fairy tale!

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by W. James Antle, III

http://spectator.org/blog/2009/05/11/the-edwards-doomsday-scenario

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

Follow Me

Jay D. Homnick | 5.25.12

A Test of National Honor

Hal G.P. Colebatch | 5.25.12

How About the Record of DOE Capital?

William Tucker | 5.25.12

The Great Debate

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.24.12

ADVERTISEMENT