The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT

The Spectacle Blog

This strikes me as more than a little over the top. A news story suggests that President Obama is under pressure to name the first openly gay Supreme Court justice. Even the religious right leader quoted in the story says his organization will focus on the nominee's judicial philosophy. The ranking Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee says, "I'm not inclined to think that would be an automatic disqualification." But it is the Republicans who are focused on sexual orientation?

None of the Republican senators quoted say they will vote against a judicial nominee because he or she is gay. The closest any of them comes to saying such a nominee would be unwise is Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.). But it's okay for the president to nominate someone because of their sexual orientation. And anything less than unbridled enthusiasm shows an unhealthy obsession with sexual orientation. We live in interesting times.

About the Author

W. James Antle, III is associate editor of The American Spectator. You can follow him on Twitter at http://Twitter.com/Jimantle.

http://spectator.org/blog/2009/05/07/not-exactly-dont-ask-dont-tell

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

ADVERTISEMENT