-
Adieu, Adieu, Remember Me
March 25, 2011 | 39 comments
-
DeMint's Defense of RomneyCare is Ignorant...And Dangerous
March 17, 2011 | 85 comments
-
McConnell Pushing Vote to Block the EPA from Regulating Carbon Emissions
March 17, 2011 | 9 comments
-
More Barbour on Afghanistan
March 16, 2011 | 8 comments
-
House Passes Three Week Spending Bill
March 15, 2011 | 8 comments









Bob| 5.6.09 @ 10:04AM
Would Reagan have gone into Iraq?
NavyBrat| 5.6.09 @ 10:32AM
It makes one wonder how the closet anti Semite Obama would react to hearing that the Israelis bombed Iran's nuke sites. I doubt he'd be so non plussed. Hell, he'd probably be the first to, "condemn, in the strongest possible terms, this unprovoked assault on the peaceful nuke program of the peaceful government of Iran, who never meant Israel any harm." Or words to that effect. Then we could also count on his (Obama's) UN stooge calling for sanctions against Israel for acting pro actively in their self defense, & doing us a favor in the meantime. Thankfully, we don't have to worry about BiBi knuckling under to this neophyte boob we have in the White House. When the bets are called in, one can always count on Israel to do what is necessary, as was the case with air raid on Osirak.
notmypresident09| 5.6.09 @ 12:42PM
NavyBrat, He would poop his pampers and then go to the UN for a sternly worded reprimand.
Aaron| 5.6.09 @ 12:48PM
Bob- I think Reagan would have targeted S.H. in Iraq ala Gaddafi in Libya. With the exception of having stealth fighters and no tip off from someone such as the Malta PM. Reagan certainly would not have made excuses such as WMDs. The only reason needed was S.H.s non-compliance with the rules of the sandbox.
Reagan would have never gone into Iraq, what would have been the need? Without us creating a quagmire the U.N. would have stepped in and created the quagmire for years to come!
Bob| 5.6.09 @ 1:02PM
Aaron -- I agree. But the larger point is that now that we are in Iraq, it changes the way you deal with Iran. Therefore, the comparison is flawed.