The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
The Largest Selection of Liberal-baiting Merchandise on the Net!
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email

AmSpecBlog

Environmentalist Edit-Whores Strike Again

Those of us in the global warming debunkification (okay, I made that word up) movement are used to being ignored — or (usually) politely being humored first, and then ignored — but I thought this experience was worth noting in the blogosphere.

Last week the Heartland folks referred a reporter to me from a Midwestern weekly newspaper, who had some questions about a greenhouse gas inventory her county was compiling and where she could expect public policy to go next. I had no idea where her sentiments were on the issue, but I gave her straight feedback based upon examples I’d seen elsewhere. What she did with it after that was up to her, and I did not care much either way what she did, given my past experience with environmentalist journalists.

Turns out she sought to do a balanced article, but her editor would have none of it. I usually like to name names with things like this, but I assume the reporter wants to keep her job so I will refrain. This is what she emailed me:

Paul:
Thank you so much for your responses. I did a story, but my editor removed all references to debate about climate change, global warming or whatever they are calling it now. He didn’t tell me, which is unusual when removing such a huge chunk of  a story, but I just discovered it today after it didn’t appear in our print edition.

It is online, but is not as I wrote it. I’m so sorry. I will still try to get both sides of all issues out. That’s all I can do. Thank you, and again, I apologize.

Cross-posted at Globalwarming.org.

topics:
Global Warming

Comments

Pingback| 5.6.09 @ 3:00PM

Environmentalist Edit-Whores Strike Again | But As For Me links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

Environmentalist Edit-Whores Strike Again | But As For Me TWITTER • FACEBOOK But As For

John W.| 5.7.09 @ 8:46AM

The editor is a (fill in your own.) On the positive side, it's nice to know there are still journalists out there who have professional standards.

tim maguire| 5.12.09 @ 2:46PM

Ok, I'll play.

The editor is a[n] (accurate representation of today's responsible journalism).

The journalist is (probably new, she'll learn the narrative soon enough).

ghd Hair Straightener| 8.24.09 @ 10:48PM

Your articles are well written, I like it very much ~
If you have any needs, they can provide the following for your reference:
ghd Hair Straightener
Bose headphones for sale
I wish you have a wonderful day!Thank you.

candyxiaoxiao| 8.28.09 @ 3:34AM

Ultra Short Ugg Boots

Leave a Comment

Related Articles

ADVERTISEMENT

Are you in a mob?

The Democrats say Obamacare opponents are a mob. Are they right?

         

Participating in this survey will subscribe you to the American Spectator email newsletter. You may unsubscribe at any time.

Defending Cao

Quin Hillyer

* * * *

The Elite Search for Non-Meaning at Fort Hood

Robert Stacy McCain

* * * *

Members to Watch

Philip Klein

* * * *

The 39 Democrats Who Voted "No"

Philip Klein

* * * *

Pelosi's Pyrrhic Victory?

Philip Klein

* * * *

Pro-Life Amendment Passes Easily

Philip Klein

* * * *

One Step Forward, Two Races Back

George Neumayr

* * * *

Divisive Unanimity

Daniel J. Flynn

* * * *

Joe Wilson, Call Your Office

Larry Thornberry

* * * *

ACORN's Big Spender

Matthew Vadum

* * * *

The Spirit of 1989

Doug Bandow

* * * *

The Somali-Kenya Connection

George H. Wittman

* * * *

Tex Mess

William Murchison

* * * *

Feeding the Beast

Philip Klein

* * * *
ADVERTISEMENT