Daniel Larison's points
about the utility (or futility) of a conservative senator
exulting in his party's minority status are fair enough. (Though
some of it should be understood as the hyperbole of a political
movement that doesn't know what else to do besides rally the
faithful and hope that this 1964 is followed by 1980 soon.) But
the reformist project is specifically aimed at trying to direct
the conservative movement and the Republican Party toward what it
understands to be a more productive direction. Much of what
reformist conservatives do, however, practically guarantees that
this audience will never listen to them. Yes, many conservatives
don't want to have the conversation that reformists are trying to
start. But nobody wants to have a conversation with someone who
treats them with contempt. The "Henry Clay" article wasn't even
the best example of that contempt posted that day!
If their point of view is that Hannitized conservatives can't be
reached, then the reformists need to develop an entirely
different strategy. Of course, I suspect that deep down they know
moderate Republicanism divorced from the conservative base is an
even smaller rump and one that historically has been just as
dependent on Democratic overreach to win elections. Outside of
Senate races in Maine, that is.