The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

The Kaiser Family Foundation is out with a helpful new tracking poll demonstrating that public attitudes on the health care are very susceptible to how the issue is framed. At first glance, the numbers would seem to be great news for liberals. For instance, by a 59 percent to 37 percent margin, Americans surveyed believe that the economic crisis makes it more important than ever to reform health care now, and majorities of Americans support at least some tax increases to pay for health care, mandates on employers to provide coverage, and a government plan option. Yet when the questions are asked a different way to incorporate criticisms of the various proposals, support for them drops dramatically.

For instance, when asked "Would you favor or oppose requiring employers to offer health insurance to their workers or pay money into a government fund that will pay to cover those without insurance?" 71 percent say they favor such an approach compared with just 25 percent who oppose it. Yet when Kaiser followed up by asking, "What if you heard that paying for this may cause some employers to lay off some workers?" 65 percent of those who initially said they supported the proposal decided they were opposed, while just 27 percent said they'd still support it.

When asked, "Would you favor or oppose creating a (government-administered) public health insurance option similar to Medicare to compete with private health insurance plans?" respondents supported the measure by a 67 percent to 29 percent margin. Yet if they were told that this would "give the government an unfair advantage over private insurance companies," 59 percent of those initially inclined toward a government plan flipped, while just 32 percent were still in favor.

Also, as far as taxes are concerned, large majorities said they would strongly or somewhat favor some form of tax increases to subsidize health care for the uninsured, including increasing the cigarette tax (65% support) and raising taxes on those making over $250,000 a year (71% support). Yet, when it came to broad-based tax hikes, only 28 percent said they would support increasing income tax.

Taken together, what these numbers mean is that there is an opening for Republicans to erode public support for Democratic health care reforms if -- and granted this is a big if -- they can effectively articulate the consequences of the proposals being touted by Democrats. The reality is that a mandate on businesses is effectively a tax on employment that would cost jobs, having the government "compete" for business with insurers it regulates on a national insurance exchange will be unfair, and the massive cost of national health care (on top of all of the other spending Obama is proposing) will necessitate far broader tax increases than the ones currently being proposed for wealthier Americans.

View all comments (6) | Leave a comment

Mary| 4.23.09 @ 6:44PM

Also, as far as taxes are concerned, large majorities said they would strongly or somewhat favor some form of tax increases to subsidize health care for the uninsured, including increasing the cigarette tax (65% support) and raising taxes on those making over $250,000 a year (71% support). Yet, when it came to broad-based tax hikes, only 28 percent said they would support increasing income tax.

This is the democrats' ace in the hole and a stake in the heart of anything resembling McCain's health care proposal. IOW, anything that could remotely be thought of as limited government plan.

Good or bad, he couldn't explain any of it.

Dr. David Robinson| 4.24.09 @ 7:00PM

The opening statement says it all. Media will lead with a quote/question framed to sway opinion in a certain direction. If I may allowed to digress and direct readers to some ideas on my blog concerning health care INSURANCE reform, which I believe is the primary necessity: http://www.FitTrimHealthy4Life.BlogSpot.com
Thank you!

ffsd| 8.30.09 @ 10:04PM

Nike is hot sale ,brand's magic is power ,(http://www.airmaxzone.com/nike-air-max-2009-shoes-c-17.html)Nike air max 2009 is new style in this year ,I believe you can like it.

fdsfs| 8.30.09 @ 10:05PM

Nike have long history ,which is famous for it real quality and durable.make you feets comfortable,running shoes ,sale in
airmaxzone online store.
Hot sale nike air max ,cheap but real quality ,for example nike air max 2009,nike air max 2003 etc.

hfg| 8.30.09 @ 10:06PM

Nike is hot sale ,brand's magic is power ,Nike air max 2009 is new style in this year ,I believe you can like it.

jojo| 1.11.10 @ 2:07AM

nike outlet
adidas outlet

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by Philip Klein

http://spectator.org/blog/2009/04/23/poll-finds-americans-health-ca

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

Follow Me

Jay D. Homnick | 5.25.12

A Test of National Honor

Hal G.P. Colebatch | 5.25.12

How About the Record of DOE Capital?

William Tucker | 5.25.12

The Great Debate

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.24.12

ADVERTISEMENT