Minnesotans may soon welcome Al Franken as their Senator
according to
this piece by Scott Johnson (of Power Line) at National
Review. The Franken/Coleman debacle has been playing out in
trial for the last several weeks. The case is technically still
pending with the panel judges, but Johnson thinks it's in the bag
for the comedian. He also thinks while Franken's politics
are as ugly as he is unfunny, he didn't steal the
election, he just outsmarted his opponent. I'm not sure I
completely agree with him--at least, don't want to--but it looks
like he's followed it much closer than I have, has been in touch
with more contacts on the ground there, and makes a strong case
to that end.
Those who postulate Democratic shenanigans as the cause of
Coleman's difficulties fail to reckon with the December 18
decision of the Minnesota Supreme Court on the inclusion of
previously rejected absentee ballots in the recount. The
Minnesota Supreme Court held that absentee ballots identified
by local officials during the recount as wrongly rejected
should be included in the recount subject to agreement of the
parties (and also subject to the possibility of sanctions on
the parties' lawyers for withholding agreement in bad faith).
It's worth a read, though it may depress--as much as
inform--you. I guess I'll have to eat my
words.