The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

It's not easy being a centrist Democrat these days. In the April issue of The American Spectator's print edition, I point out that the Blue Dog Coalition in the House has actually done relatively little to rein in the Obama administration and their liberal congressional leadership. Now liberal pressure groups are mobilizing against the Blue Dogs and self-styled deficit hawks in the Senate Democratic caucus in order to keep it that way.

PACs like Accountability Now plan on supporting primary challenges to insufficiently liberal Democrats in 2010, acting like a netroots-connected progressive version of the Club for Growth. Other groups are up on the air with ads right now trying to get Democratic members of Congress to vote for Obama's budget without trimming any of the spending. Even the Obama administration isn't immune for liberal pressure, though Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner seems to be the fall guy for now.

A lot of the Democrats caught in the middle between conservative and liberal criticism face a Catch-22 politically: many of them could be vulnerable to primary challenges if they show too much independence from the party line, but their party-line voting makes them vulnerable to Republicans in the general election.

View all comments (2) | Leave a comment

Becky| 3.26.09 @ 12:31PM

I'm just not that into the Blue Dogs. It sounds like if they go with the left now, they won't be challenged in their own primary, but will have a higher chance on being defeated by a Republican candidate, (and make it harder to be free from the dictates of the Soros gang). On the other hand, if they buck the special interests, they may lose the primary challenge to a candidate who, it seems, will probably have a higher chance on losing to a Republican anyway.
The real quandry seems to be how much character and conscience they have and what it is worth.

Angel| 3.26.09 @ 1:52PM

Cry me a river. Like I so don't give a flip about these demo morons. They were just Rahm-posers anyway--nothing conservative about them. I hope we run REAL CONSERVATIVES in 2010 and send these losers home--for good.

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by W. James Antle, III

http://spectator.org/blog/2009/03/26/moderate-democrats-feeling-the

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

Follow Me

Jay D. Homnick | 5.25.12

A Test of National Honor

Hal G.P. Colebatch | 5.25.12

How About the Record of DOE Capital?

William Tucker | 5.25.12

The Great Debate

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.24.12

ADVERTISEMENT