It's not easy being a centrist
Democrat these days. In the April issue of The American
Spectator's print edition, I point out that the Blue Dog
Coalition in the House has actually done relatively little to
rein in the Obama administration and their liberal congressional
leadership. Now liberal pressure groups are mobilizing against
the Blue Dogs and self-styled deficit hawks in the Senate
Democratic caucus in order to keep it that way.
PACs like Accountability Now plan on
supporting primary challenges to insufficiently liberal Democrats
in 2010, acting like a netroots-connected progressive version of
the Club for Growth. Other groups are up on the air with ads
right now trying to get Democratic members of Congress to vote
for Obama's budget without trimming any of the spending. Even the
Obama administration isn't immune for liberal pressure, though
Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner seems to be the
fall guy for now.
A lot of the Democrats caught in the middle between conservative
and liberal criticism face a Catch-22 politically: many of them
could be vulnerable to primary challenges if they show too much
independence from the party line, but their party-line voting
makes them vulnerable to Republicans in the general election.
I'm just not that into the Blue Dogs. It sounds like if they go
with the left now, they won't be challenged in their own primary,
but will have a higher chance on being defeated by a Republican
candidate, (and make it harder to be free from the dictates of
the Soros gang). On the other hand, if they buck the special
interests, they may lose the primary challenge to a candidate
who, it seems, will probably have a higher chance on losing to a
Republican anyway.
The real quandry seems to be how much character and conscience
they have and what it is worth.
Angel| 3.26.09 @ 1:52PM
Cry me a river. Like I so don't give a flip about these demo
morons. They were just Rahm-posers anyway--nothing conservative
about them. I hope we run REAL CONSERVATIVES in 2010 and send
these losers home--for good.
Becky| 3.26.09 @ 12:31PM
I'm just not that into the Blue Dogs. It sounds like if they go with the left now, they won't be challenged in their own primary, but will have a higher chance on being defeated by a Republican candidate, (and make it harder to be free from the dictates of the Soros gang). On the other hand, if they buck the special interests, they may lose the primary challenge to a candidate who, it seems, will probably have a higher chance on losing to a Republican anyway.
The real quandry seems to be how much character and conscience they have and what it is worth.
Angel| 3.26.09 @ 1:52PM
Cry me a river. Like I so don't give a flip about these demo morons. They were just Rahm-posers anyway--nothing conservative about them. I hope we run REAL CONSERVATIVES in 2010 and send these losers home--for good.