My first question after reading Parker's column was, how many
newspapers have dropped her column? She
shifted from Tribune's syndicate (no sour grapes there --
just ask her!), where she was in as many as 335 newspapers, a
few years ago to the Washington Post's.
My first question after reading Parker's column was, how many
newspapers have dropped her column? She
shifted from Tribune's syndicate (no sour grapes there --
just ask her!), where she was in as many as 335 newspapers, a
few years ago to the Washington Post's. As Williamson
notes, the Lubbock newspaper recently yanked her from its
conservative slot. Could her rant be a desperation attempt to
preserve her clever-girl status?
Update 2:45 p.m.:
Editor & Publisher
offers some insight about the state of the newspaper
syndicates:
"With a few exceptions, that's one of the great urban myths of
our business," says Alan Shearer, executive director and
general manager of the Washington Post Writers Group, when
asked whether newspapers' loss of manpower is translating into
increased sales of syndicated content. "Because saving costs
involves not just reducing staff, but reducing space. And don't
let anyone tell you otherwise."
"Not only are [newspapers'] resources reduced, but their
editorial space is reduced also," concurs Lisa Klem Wilson,
senior vice president/general manager of syndicates at United
Media. "We have to be creative about what we give them, and
what they can use and sell against."
Wilson says comics and puzzles remain very popular ("in any
kind of market," she points out), punditry less so. She says
newspapers are electing to run fewer syndicated columnists on
the Op-Ed page, and some columnists are also disappearing from
financial pages as those sections are reduced or consolidated
into other sections.