When I
say that some "reform Republicans" seem to have disdain for
the entire conservative project,
this is an example of what I mean. The concerns of
"[c]onservatives who object to moderate Republican officeholders"
are not too subtly compared to a 1960s smear campaign against
moderate Republican Sen. Thomas Kuchel. Kuchel voted with his
party's conservatives on some issues (he was against censuring
Joe McCarthy and for the Vietnam War) and with liberals on
others, like Medicare. He supported civil rights legislation, but
so did some
Republicans to his right. Kuchel lost a primary to a more
conservative Republican in 1968 and liberal Democrat Alan
Cranston ended up holding the seat for four terms.
The moral of the story? Writes our blogger, Geoffrey Kabaservice:
"Given that California has not elected a Republican senator since
1988, however, it may be time to examine Kuchel's lessons of how
to win in the nation's largest state rather than continuing to
emphasize the dictum of 'no enemies on the right.'"
Where to begin? The Kuchel-Rafferty primary came six years after
William F. Buckley Jr. denounced the John Birch Society. It came
two years after Ronald Reagan -- who Kabaservice acknowledges did
not support the anti-Kuchel smears -- beat a moderate Republican
in a primary and distanced himself from the Birchers,
winning the governorship in the process. It was followed by the
Reagan re-election, S.I. Hayakawa, George Deukmejian, Pete
Wilson, and Republicans carrying California in every presidential
election for the next twenty years.
Conservatives haven't done very well in statewide elections in
California since the mid-1990s. Of course, neither have moderate
Republicans: Ed Zschau, John Seymour, and Tom Campbell all lost
Senate races. One moderate, Michael Huffington, and one
conservative, Bruce Herschensohn, came close to winning Senate
seats there in the '90s. The latter lost in part due to
allegations he frequented a strip club. Arnold Schwarzenegger
arguably won his last election in California by following
Kuchel's lessons, but future generations of California taxpayers
may wish their ancestors had voted for Tom McClintock instead.
I don't think Pete Wilson should be labeled a "moderate." That is
only used because he is pro-choice. But in California, it really
doesn't matter because the State constitution mandates that
abortion is illegal. He couldn't do anything about the law if he
wanted to.
So let's focus on his conservative ideals and what he did. Pete
was and is a Reagan Republican through and through. And, after
Reagan, he was California's most successful Republican. And he
took a huge deficit and turned it around into a surplus. I wish
we could roll back the term limit law so that our favorite x -
Governor could run again!
LarryMcDonaldSupporter| 3.17.09 @ 3:52PM
Buckley denounced The John Birch Society because he was part of a
conspiracy to create a new world order. The John Birch Society is
a great society which has been working for decades to stop the
new world order.
Felipe| 3.14.09 @ 1:15PM
I don't think Pete Wilson should be labeled a "moderate." That is only used because he is pro-choice. But in California, it really doesn't matter because the State constitution mandates that abortion is illegal. He couldn't do anything about the law if he wanted to.
So let's focus on his conservative ideals and what he did. Pete was and is a Reagan Republican through and through. And, after Reagan, he was California's most successful Republican. And he took a huge deficit and turned it around into a surplus. I wish we could roll back the term limit law so that our favorite x - Governor could run again!
LarryMcDonaldSupporter| 3.17.09 @ 3:52PM
Buckley denounced The John Birch Society because he was part of a conspiracy to create a new world order. The John Birch Society is a great society which has been working for decades to stop the new world order.