In response to Bonnie Erbe's
blog entry on Bristol Palin, Maggie Gallagher has it
just right: Whatever the merits of abstinence-only sex
education -- it's an empirical question, but every study I've
seen on the matter was conducted by an organization biased one
way or the other, with predictable results -- it is fanciful to
pretend that everyone who has an unintended pregnancy is ignorant
of contraception. And the exploitation of this girl's mistakes as
a stick with which to beat her mother is unseemly.
You're right, of course, this isn't about Bristol; liberals are
just using her as a weapon against her mother, Governor Palin.
The left fears Sarah--and they should.
Thomas| 3.12.09 @ 9:38PM
There is a distinct lack of civilized behavior in this world.
Here you have a young woman who, if she was not the daughter of a
popular conservative politician, would be held up as another
victim of teen sexuality and its unintended consequences b y
liberals. But she is the daughter of a prominent conservative
politician, so she is ridiculed, humiliated and persecuted with
glee by the same "compassionate" liberals. Sad, very sad. This is
a non-story, because it is one of thousands of such stories that
are acted out every year. Give the young woman a break and move
on.
Maiq| 3.12.09 @ 10:09PM
> The left fears Sarah--and they should.
Gag...
ruth| 3.12.09 @ 10:26PM
Truth hurts, libtard. If you don't fear Palin, why do you morons
attack her daughter, besides the fact that you liberals are
vicious?
Jim| 3.12.09 @ 10:28PM
All would be forgiven (and rewarded) if she were a minority.
CH| 3.12.09 @ 10:40PM
A minority or a liberal. Of course, if her mother were a liberal,
the baby would have been aborted; nice and tidy like.
ruth,
Yeah, well, it's not much of a weapon, is it? Conservative
Christians and Jews shrug and say that forgiveness is the
issue... and it's not even Sarah. So what?
Liberals think they have a "gotcha" issue here, but
that's because they have no fr*ckin' clue about conservatives
values.
Alan Brooks| 3.12.09 @ 10:49PM
no objective spectator (or Spectator) blames Bristol and her
family for the copulation explosion and its resulting
pathologies.
ruth| 3.12.09 @ 10:56PM
Good Lord, Alan, that is so gross! He's a baby boy, not a
pathology!!
Alan Brooks| 3.12.09 @ 10:56PM
it's not just liberalism, it's futurism as well, a even more
bat-brained version of liberalism. it mixes liberalism with ..
other stuff, but it is like drinking rum mixed with gasoline: you
wont get very drunk but you will get very sick.
if you see a copy of future shock or some other futurist book,
please, throw it in the garbage.
if you come across a futurist
ruth| 3.12.09 @ 10:59PM
Maiq = Bob. Chicken.
ruth| 3.12.09 @ 11:01PM
Rum and gasoline will get you very dead. Even if you are a
futurist.
Alan Brooks| 3.12.09 @ 11:03PM
oh, no, Ruth, i meant the couple's splitting up is a result of
the mentality of today. Sarah and her husband aren't like that
but the younger set are more at risk from being exposed to 'do
your own thing even if you break up'.
do you really think I would diss a baby?
narciso| 3.12.09 @ 11:03PM
That was a rather ridiculous article, because one, although she
prefers abstinence, Gov. Palin, hasn't insisted on it, her school
didn't have it in her curriculum, in fact, you could argue the
opposite is true, re the school's curriculum, an argument it
didn't occur to you to make.
Alan Brooks| 3.12.09 @ 11:04PM
yes.
very sick= very dead.
Alan Brooks| 3.12.09 @ 11:06PM
narciso
of course she didnt insist on it, this is 2009. you cant insist
on decency anymore.
ruth| 3.12.09 @ 11:07PM
Alan, you could have been joking; of course you NEVER joke
around, right? Bristol is better off without that guy; he wasn't
a keeper. Bristol needs to grow up--she will--with a kid on her
hip. And she's only 18.
ruth| 3.12.09 @ 11:09PM
Liberals have no decency--that was my point. They will do
anything to win--even pretend to be 'tolerant'.
Ran| 3.12.09 @ 11:12PM
Alan, we are the futurists here. Statism is seeing it's last
bubble form. Thatcher pointed out that eventually liberals and
statists run out of someone else's money and the whole bubble
collapses.
ruth: rum and gasoline is called "E-85". "Flex-fool" engines burn
the garbage.
ruth| 3.12.09 @ 11:15PM
Ran: Maybe Bristol isn't much of a weapon, but I think using her
against her mother is very cruel. I couldn't even imagine being
this heartless.
ruth| 3.12.09 @ 11:17PM
Oh, I'm clueless. Alan posts in code--sometimes it's tough for me
to break it. LOL
Alan Brooks| 3.12.09 @ 11:23PM
ruth,
sure we all joke around but the copulation explosion's social
pathologies are no joke. my neighborhood has broken families with
messy houses, and so do many, many neighborhoods.
futurists, Ran? i don't like that word in any context anymore.
the morality of Thatcher and Reagan is fading. you think a
non-welfare state will improve morality? 2023 will not be 1983.
ruth| 3.12.09 @ 11:26PM
Ran, I appreciate your optimism--a lot. Willing to offer a
guarantee with your fine words?
ruth| 3.12.09 @ 11:31PM
I understand what you're saying, Alan; I agree and it saddens me.
In Bristol's case, though, she's better off taking care of her
son and getting her life together. I don't think that guy loved
Bristol enough to marry her--he seemed very immature; which is
understandable. At least she didn't kill that adorable baby--he's
so cute. She has a strong family, she's lucky.
Alan Brooks| 3.12.09 @ 11:35PM
it's not so much that posting in code, ruth, though i AM
nonplussed.
just for instance, writing "you cant insist on decency in 2009"
means i give up. if Palin were to insist on abstinence
instruction then a list of her boyfriends from hi skool would
appear on the web. the web means instantaneous political
retaliation.
ruth| 3.12.09 @ 11:45PM
Alan, I know, but I still don't care. That's why I ridicule
liberals so much, I don't respect them. I like Ran's
attitude--sometimes I get so upset I get too emotional. Alan,
never give in and never give up, there is still decency and
goodness in this world.
Bristol will be just fine. Like so many single moms, she and her
family will raise this little boy. Her life won't be the way she
planned it, but life's mistakes are great teachers. She is
learning valuable life lessons at a tender age.
Ran| 3.13.09 @ 12:06AM
Alan, ruth,
It's not so much that a non-welfare state wil improve morality,
it's the other way around.
Here's the thing: Between abortion and family avoidance, liberals
have been wiping-out their species here in the US. Conservatives
- especially religious conservatives - of Christian and Jewish
faiths have been having kids. There is a demographic tide rising
to replace all those hippie boomers, and it ain't librul.
This rising tide is also of the culture that brought the greatest
wealth to the greatest number of people in human history. Every
liberal society afloat is sinking under it's declining family
replacement and fiscal debt load. That includes America's liberal
component. And nearly every culture looks around and asks "so,
who's doing well, and how do we stack-up?"
Answer, it's US. We, conservative, religious, small-business,
market-investing, freedom-loving, gun-totin', charity-donating
religious types. The rest of the world looks and asks "Can we
have that, too?" Well, yeah, why not? Try it. Statism sucks.
As the US flirts with statist quasi-fascist experiments, the
market reflects the real value - frickin' HALF of what it had
been, and THAT under a few really stupid market-limiting laws.
The world looks, thinks "Huh. Maybe they had it right the
first time. My GE stocks are in the tank, and hon, good thing we
sold NY Times when we did."
Look: Iffff we can keep the Obama Democrats from enacting
permanent amnesty, we stymie their main source of new Democrats.
They are at their peak; this is their bubble they are standing
atop. There are fewer and fewer new liberal babies in the ranks
to replace them. They don't have the kids to run a liberal
future, and they don't have enough of other peoples' money even
if they did.
This is NOT going to be easy. The Hun are at our gates. It can, I
think it will, get ugly from time to time. Our Constitution will
take some serious dents, but that too has a future under
restoration.
ruth, it's kids like yours and mine and RSM's who are coming
along. You just know how we abhor God and Guns in our
home! Heh. They are the future. God bless Bristol, too,
her kid will be OK.
krishna| 3.13.09 @ 12:10AM
Everyone who puts themselves up for public office and makes
pronouncements on morality MUST be re-measured with a reality
stick whenever it is clear they ought to know better or are being
hypocrites. Having a pregnant teen daughter should have been
enough evidence for Sarah Palin to reconsider her hardline
stances on education and contraception. Secondly, Bristol didnt
say why she broke up with her fiancé (even under intense pressure
to stay together), and no one has any business speculating -
privacy applies. Anyway this should be evidence enough for you
conservatives that single mom-hood occurs legitmately and the
moms deserve real support.
Rich Rostrom| 3.13.09 @ 12:16AM
krishna: What "hard-line stance... on contraception"? Governor
Palin supports contraception for couples who don't want to have
children. Has for years. Very publicly.
ruth| 3.13.09 @ 12:19AM
Thanks, Ran. I've tried to live with decency, it's not enough to
just talk--you've got to walk, otherwise your kids will blow you
off. It's not always easy--but it's worth it.
Ran| 3.13.09 @ 12:19AM
"Having a pregnant teen daughter should have been enough
evidence for Sarah Palin to reconsider her hardline stances on
education and contraception."
Ifff you had done any - ANY - homework, krishna, you'd
know that Palin is known in Alaska as a moderate on both of
those issues. You know... Everyone who puts themselves up
for public comment had better do some research before they
make utter jack-asses of themselves. Got any other pearls of
wisdom you'd care to enlighten us with?
If I said what I really think, Antle & Co. would ban
me from TAS. Permanently.
narciso| 3.13.09 @ 12:22AM
Except you didn't see the 2006 KTUU governor's debate, so
naturally you don't know what you're talking about, that's what I
meant by insist. She's a Feminist for Life, it wasn't about
blackmail. The unspoken detail was her enemies on the left,
but
specially on the right, who set about in every way
possible to drive them apart, telling lies about the
apprenticeship, arranging that bust around the time, the child
was being born, in part to get back at her actions against
trooper Wooten.
ruth| 3.13.09 @ 12:24AM
What pronouncements has Palin made regarding morality? What
planet have you been living on? Liberals have trashed the privacy
of Palin and her daughter--this should be evidence for you
liberals that you are hypocrites.
ruth| 3.13.09 @ 12:27AM
That's what is so amazing about Palin--she cleaned up corruption
in her own party. There is no one else like her. Certainly not
Corruption King Obummer. Change we can believe in--what a sick
joke.
Ran| 3.13.09 @ 12:32AM
ruth,
that's another reason for the visceral terror of her felt on the
Left. She's a party pooper.
Some kid at a Tea Party had a great sign: Chains We Can Believe
In?
ruth| 3.13.09 @ 12:43AM
I liked the way she held Trig at the Repub Convention; almost
defiant. She's tough.
ruth| 3.13.09 @ 12:44AM
'Chains we can believe in'. Great.
andrew| 3.13.09 @ 2:08AM
ruth, ran and bob, you all need real help, and you need it fast.
visceral terror ruth? really?
i'm sure they would have gotten married if she hadn't been
running for vp. god i hope i never find this place again..
ruth| 3.13.09 @ 2:15AM
I didn't say 'visceral terror', moron. You really need help
learning to read.
ruth| 3.12.09 @ 9:34PM
You're right, of course, this isn't about Bristol; liberals are just using her as a weapon against her mother, Governor Palin. The left fears Sarah--and they should.
Thomas| 3.12.09 @ 9:38PM
There is a distinct lack of civilized behavior in this world. Here you have a young woman who, if she was not the daughter of a popular conservative politician, would be held up as another victim of teen sexuality and its unintended consequences b y liberals. But she is the daughter of a prominent conservative politician, so she is ridiculed, humiliated and persecuted with glee by the same "compassionate" liberals. Sad, very sad. This is a non-story, because it is one of thousands of such stories that are acted out every year. Give the young woman a break and move on.
Maiq| 3.12.09 @ 10:09PM
> The left fears Sarah--and they should.
Gag...
ruth| 3.12.09 @ 10:26PM
Truth hurts, libtard. If you don't fear Palin, why do you morons attack her daughter, besides the fact that you liberals are vicious?
Jim| 3.12.09 @ 10:28PM
All would be forgiven (and rewarded) if she were a minority.
CH| 3.12.09 @ 10:40PM
A minority or a liberal. Of course, if her mother were a liberal, the baby would have been aborted; nice and tidy like.
Ran| 3.12.09 @ 10:47PM
Maiq,
You've eloquently, monosyllabicly made ruth's point. [Who says liberals aren't geniuses?]
ruth,
Yeah, well, it's not much of a weapon, is it? Conservative Christians and Jews shrug and say that forgiveness is the issue... and it's not even Sarah. So what?
Liberals think they have a "gotcha" issue here, but that's because they have no fr*ckin' clue about conservatives values.
Alan Brooks| 3.12.09 @ 10:49PM
no objective spectator (or Spectator) blames Bristol and her family for the copulation explosion and its resulting pathologies.
ruth| 3.12.09 @ 10:56PM
Good Lord, Alan, that is so gross! He's a baby boy, not a pathology!!
Alan Brooks| 3.12.09 @ 10:56PM
it's not just liberalism, it's futurism as well, a even more bat-brained version of liberalism. it mixes liberalism with .. other stuff, but it is like drinking rum mixed with gasoline: you wont get very drunk but you will get very sick.
if you see a copy of future shock or some other futurist book, please, throw it in the garbage.
if you come across a futurist
ruth| 3.12.09 @ 10:59PM
Maiq = Bob. Chicken.
ruth| 3.12.09 @ 11:01PM
Rum and gasoline will get you very dead. Even if you are a futurist.
Alan Brooks| 3.12.09 @ 11:03PM
oh, no, Ruth, i meant the couple's splitting up is a result of the mentality of today. Sarah and her husband aren't like that but the younger set are more at risk from being exposed to 'do your own thing even if you break up'.
do you really think I would diss a baby?
narciso| 3.12.09 @ 11:03PM
That was a rather ridiculous article, because one, although she prefers abstinence, Gov. Palin, hasn't insisted on it, her school didn't have it in her curriculum, in fact, you could argue the opposite is true, re the school's curriculum, an argument it didn't occur to you to make.
Alan Brooks| 3.12.09 @ 11:04PM
yes.
very sick= very dead.
Alan Brooks| 3.12.09 @ 11:06PM
narciso
of course she didnt insist on it, this is 2009. you cant insist on decency anymore.
ruth| 3.12.09 @ 11:07PM
Alan, you could have been joking; of course you NEVER joke around, right? Bristol is better off without that guy; he wasn't a keeper. Bristol needs to grow up--she will--with a kid on her hip. And she's only 18.
ruth| 3.12.09 @ 11:09PM
Liberals have no decency--that was my point. They will do anything to win--even pretend to be 'tolerant'.
Ran| 3.12.09 @ 11:12PM
Alan, we are the futurists here. Statism is seeing it's last bubble form. Thatcher pointed out that eventually liberals and statists run out of someone else's money and the whole bubble collapses.
ruth: rum and gasoline is called "E-85". "Flex-fool" engines burn the garbage.
ruth| 3.12.09 @ 11:15PM
Ran: Maybe Bristol isn't much of a weapon, but I think using her against her mother is very cruel. I couldn't even imagine being this heartless.
ruth| 3.12.09 @ 11:17PM
Oh, I'm clueless. Alan posts in code--sometimes it's tough for me to break it. LOL
Alan Brooks| 3.12.09 @ 11:23PM
ruth,
sure we all joke around but the copulation explosion's social pathologies are no joke. my neighborhood has broken families with messy houses, and so do many, many neighborhoods.
futurists, Ran? i don't like that word in any context anymore. the morality of Thatcher and Reagan is fading. you think a non-welfare state will improve morality? 2023 will not be 1983.
ruth| 3.12.09 @ 11:26PM
Ran, I appreciate your optimism--a lot. Willing to offer a guarantee with your fine words?
ruth| 3.12.09 @ 11:31PM
I understand what you're saying, Alan; I agree and it saddens me. In Bristol's case, though, she's better off taking care of her son and getting her life together. I don't think that guy loved Bristol enough to marry her--he seemed very immature; which is understandable. At least she didn't kill that adorable baby--he's so cute. She has a strong family, she's lucky.
Alan Brooks| 3.12.09 @ 11:35PM
it's not so much that posting in code, ruth, though i AM nonplussed.
just for instance, writing "you cant insist on decency in 2009" means i give up. if Palin were to insist on abstinence instruction then a list of her boyfriends from hi skool would appear on the web. the web means instantaneous political retaliation.
ruth| 3.12.09 @ 11:45PM
Alan, I know, but I still don't care. That's why I ridicule liberals so much, I don't respect them. I like Ran's attitude--sometimes I get so upset I get too emotional. Alan, never give in and never give up, there is still decency and goodness in this world.
Denis| 3.12.09 @ 11:49PM
Bristol will be just fine. Like so many single moms, she and her family will raise this little boy. Her life won't be the way she planned it, but life's mistakes are great teachers. She is learning valuable life lessons at a tender age.
Ran| 3.13.09 @ 12:06AM
Alan, ruth,
It's not so much that a non-welfare state wil improve morality, it's the other way around.
Here's the thing: Between abortion and family avoidance, liberals have been wiping-out their species here in the US. Conservatives - especially religious conservatives - of Christian and Jewish faiths have been having kids. There is a demographic tide rising to replace all those hippie boomers, and it ain't librul.
This rising tide is also of the culture that brought the greatest wealth to the greatest number of people in human history. Every liberal society afloat is sinking under it's declining family replacement and fiscal debt load. That includes America's liberal component. And nearly every culture looks around and asks "so, who's doing well, and how do we stack-up?"
Answer, it's US. We, conservative, religious, small-business, market-investing, freedom-loving, gun-totin', charity-donating religious types. The rest of the world looks and asks "Can we have that, too?" Well, yeah, why not? Try it. Statism sucks.
As the US flirts with statist quasi-fascist experiments, the market reflects the real value - frickin' HALF of what it had been, and THAT under a few really stupid market-limiting laws. The world looks, thinks "Huh. Maybe they had it right the first time. My GE stocks are in the tank, and hon, good thing we sold NY Times when we did."
Look: Iffff we can keep the Obama Democrats from enacting permanent amnesty, we stymie their main source of new Democrats. They are at their peak; this is their bubble they are standing atop. There are fewer and fewer new liberal babies in the ranks to replace them. They don't have the kids to run a liberal future, and they don't have enough of other peoples' money even if they did.
This is NOT going to be easy. The Hun are at our gates. It can, I think it will, get ugly from time to time. Our Constitution will take some serious dents, but that too has a future under restoration.
ruth, it's kids like yours and mine and RSM's who are coming along. You just know how we abhor God and Guns in our home! Heh. They are the future. God bless Bristol, too, her kid will be OK.
krishna| 3.13.09 @ 12:10AM
Everyone who puts themselves up for public office and makes pronouncements on morality MUST be re-measured with a reality stick whenever it is clear they ought to know better or are being hypocrites. Having a pregnant teen daughter should have been enough evidence for Sarah Palin to reconsider her hardline stances on education and contraception. Secondly, Bristol didnt say why she broke up with her fiancé (even under intense pressure to stay together), and no one has any business speculating - privacy applies. Anyway this should be evidence enough for you conservatives that single mom-hood occurs legitmately and the moms deserve real support.
Rich Rostrom| 3.13.09 @ 12:16AM
krishna: What "hard-line stance... on contraception"? Governor Palin supports contraception for couples who don't want to have children. Has for years. Very publicly.
ruth| 3.13.09 @ 12:19AM
Thanks, Ran. I've tried to live with decency, it's not enough to just talk--you've got to walk, otherwise your kids will blow you off. It's not always easy--but it's worth it.
Ran| 3.13.09 @ 12:19AM
"Having a pregnant teen daughter should have been enough evidence for Sarah Palin to reconsider her hardline stances on education and contraception."
Ifff you had done any - ANY - homework, krishna, you'd know that Palin is known in Alaska as a moderate on both of those issues. You know... Everyone who puts themselves up for public comment had better do some research before they make utter jack-asses of themselves. Got any other pearls of wisdom you'd care to enlighten us with?
If I said what I really think, Antle & Co. would ban me from TAS. Permanently.
narciso| 3.13.09 @ 12:22AM
Except you didn't see the 2006 KTUU governor's debate, so naturally you don't know what you're talking about, that's what I meant by insist. She's a Feminist for Life, it wasn't about blackmail. The unspoken detail was her enemies on the left, but
specially on the right, who set about in every way
possible to drive them apart, telling lies about the apprenticeship, arranging that bust around the time, the child was being born, in part to get back at her actions against trooper Wooten.
ruth| 3.13.09 @ 12:24AM
What pronouncements has Palin made regarding morality? What planet have you been living on? Liberals have trashed the privacy of Palin and her daughter--this should be evidence for you liberals that you are hypocrites.
ruth| 3.13.09 @ 12:27AM
That's what is so amazing about Palin--she cleaned up corruption in her own party. There is no one else like her. Certainly not Corruption King Obummer. Change we can believe in--what a sick joke.
Ran| 3.13.09 @ 12:32AM
ruth,
that's another reason for the visceral terror of her felt on the Left. She's a party pooper.
Some kid at a Tea Party had a great sign: Chains We Can Believe In?
ruth| 3.13.09 @ 12:43AM
I liked the way she held Trig at the Repub Convention; almost defiant. She's tough.
ruth| 3.13.09 @ 12:44AM
'Chains we can believe in'. Great.
andrew| 3.13.09 @ 2:08AM
ruth, ran and bob, you all need real help, and you need it fast.
visceral terror ruth? really?
i'm sure they would have gotten married if she hadn't been running for vp. god i hope i never find this place again..
ruth| 3.13.09 @ 2:15AM
I didn't say 'visceral terror', moron. You really need help learning to read.
VidOmnia| 3.13.09 @ 9:59AM
Mr. Antle, a fundamental assumption of this post is incorrect. Palin believes in contraception education:
http://articles.latimes.com/2008/sep/06/nation/na-sexed6
Ran| 3.13.09 @ 10:14AM
Andrew,
I said that Palin's anti-corruption record is another reason for the visceral terror of her felt on the Left.
Yes, it's terror, fear, loathing, call it what you will. In their guts the Left are afraid of her. Very afraid.
ruth| 3.13.09 @ 11:48AM
Ran, the Left doesn't have any guts; that's why they attack Palin's daughter. You're right, liberals always make our case for us. Such tools.