Writing in the WSJ, Alan Greenspan argues
that the Fed did not cause the housing bubble because the
historically low mortgage rates that triggered the boom were not
a result of Fed rate cuts, but of changes in the global economy.
It’s worth noting that during the height of the housing boom,
Greenspan denied that a national housing bubble was possible.
Here’s what he had to say at an October 19, 2004
speech at America’s Community Banker’s Annual Convention:
Overall, while local economies may experience significant
speculative price imbalances, a national severe price
distortion seems most unlikely in the United States, given its
size and diversity.
Pingback| 3.11.09 @ 11:00AM
Greenspan Passes the Buck — But As For Me links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
ruth| 3.11.09 @ 1:38PM
What else did you expect from Andrea Mitchell's husband? Did you really expect him to 'man up'?
ECM| 3.11.09 @ 5:27PM
Alan 'Mo Money' Greenspan attempts to absolve himself of a huge percentage of the blame and, thanks to our 'blame the banks/Wall St./anybody but us' politicians, he's well on his way to getting off scott free.
Willey| 3.11.09 @ 8:35PM
I'd love to see Barney frogmarched to jail.
dad29 | 3.11.09 @ 9:09PM
"Easy Al" maintains that it was worldwide low interest rates which created the housing bubble.
OK. But as we know, the price of a commodity is directly related to its availability. So my question to "Easy Al": where did all that money COME from, which drove down the price of the money?
Al?? Al??
Pingback| 3.14.09 @ 9:55AM
‘WEEKEND OPINIONATOR: THE MAGI OF THE MELTDOWN’. GREAT RECAP OF THE WEEK IN FINANCE. links to this page. Here’s an excerpt: