The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

The always-astute Michael Barone explains why it was NOT deregulation that caused today's financial problems. As a sidelight (tooting my own horn), I would note, interestingly enough, this sentence from Barone's piece:

"Taylor writes that the financial crisis first became evident in August 9 and 10, 2007, when the spread between Libor interest rates and the three-month overnight index swap widened hugely."

That happens to be EXACTLY the time when i first started my regular warnings that monetary policy had baked stagflation into the cake. See this from Aug. 8, 2007, my very first blog post on the subject. Two blog posts later, this. A few minutes later, I even more explicitly tied the problems to the housing market. The next morning I was back at it, this time noting the LIBOR spread that Barone talks about. This kept on for a while in my blog posts, until finally I started writing full columns on the subject. My main reason to bring all this up is not to say I understood all of it then (I didn't even know then what a credit default swap was), but to say that one day before eveything started going haywire publicly (as ID'd by Barone), I had picked up on it and already said that the psychological panic response was the absolutely key thing to avoid, and that the Fed was inept at understanding that psychology. In short, I continue to assert that the Fed bears a large part of the blame not just for long-ago actions in 2002-2005, but all the way through this whole decade right up until now.

View all comments (1) | Leave a comment

Martin| 3.11.09 @ 6:43PM

The mistake is to restrict your Fed blame to this decade. The original destabilization was the dot-com bubble, which stock market mania put 1929 entirely into the shade and has caused chaos ever since.

That was started by Greenspan changing monetary policy in early '95, and expanding broad money 70% faster than nominal GDP for 13 years, 1995-2008. Almost certainly the lovely Ms Mitchell and his wish to be in with her friends the Clintons were to blame for his abandonment of everything he had previously believed.

You don't HAVE to have a Gold Standard, but if you don't have one a Paul Volcker is essential.

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by Quin Hillyer

http://spectator.org/blog/2009/03/11/barone-gets-it-right-on-econom

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

Follow Me

Jay D. Homnick | 5.25.12

A Test of National Honor

Hal G.P. Colebatch | 5.25.12

How About the Record of DOE Capital?

William Tucker | 5.25.12

The Great Debate

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.24.12

ADVERTISEMENT