The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

A reptilian blogger -- the site is called Big Lizards -- hisses that I was "unable (or afraid) to draw the obvious conclusion" in my Arlen Specter post yesterday: when Republican legislators stop voting like Republicans on "most critical, bedrock, GOP issues," Republican voters must send them packing. Now, I don't have a problem with any of this and suspect I've been in favor of tossing more Republican incumbents than this fellow. I also don't carry any particular brief for Snarlin' Arlen, who I think is wrong on almost all the issues where he dissents from the GOP line and wrong on several issues where he toes it.

But Republicans shouldn't start counting their 2010 chickens before they're hatched. Yes, there are good reasons -- historical, economic, and based on the possible consequences of the Obama administration's policies -- to hope for strong Republican gains. There are equally sound reasons, however, for the Democrats to continue licking their chops in anticipation of a filibuster-proof Senate majority. Until there is some actual, you know, evidence in the form of polling and what have you, Republicans -- and, frankly, conservatives -- should be more focused on preventing a 60-seat Democratic supermajority than measuring the drapes in Harry Reid's office.

So, assuming for now the worst-case scenario, the relevant questions become: Can Specter hold his Senate seat? Could a conservative primary challenger like Pat Toomey hold it? How often would conservatives be able to count on Specter's crucial 41st vote in a filibuster versus how frequenly he would simply provide bipartisan cover to the Obama administration? Even if Specter wins renomination, would a credible primary challenge nevertheless alter his political incentives on key votes like card check? (See Dave Weigel for Specter's existing political calculations on that score.)

Again: I haven't arrived at a definitive answer on any of these questions. But I do think they are the questions conservatives should be asking.

View all comments (5) | Leave a comment

BJC| 3.3.09 @ 4:30PM

Hey, Jim! Just one caveat first -- This is a question for conservatives and Republicans *in Pennsylvania*, as they know the temper of the times in their state better than the rest of us do. But I think what you're mulling around about here is a subset of the "leaky roof" conundrum as applied in GOP politics. When it's sunny, you don't realize you need to repair the hole in your roof; when it's raining, you can't safely get atop the roof to fix it.

Ah, but once it has rained, you have been forewarned -- which makes the George W. Bush push on behalf of Snarlin' Arlen versus Pat Toomey last time out so despicable ... such a waste, such a lost opportunity. When it was politically possible to consolidate conservative gains with more reliable candidates offered in primary contests, the GOP was unforgivably flaccid. To translate for the obtuse: We knew Specter was a "hole " in our roof six years back, and we failed to repair that "hole" by electing a reliable Republican Senator in his place, so now it's "raining" Democrat policies and Specter's "leaking" all over us.

Thomas| 3.3.09 @ 10:45PM

I don't know. Was Specter really a "turncoat"? I find it very interesting that exactly the number of Republicans necessary to pass the Porkulous bill voted for it. No more, no less.

Now, if the people of Pennsylvania don't like Arlen's vote, maybe it is time for a recall petition. I'm sure that the Republican Party would support that effort. If Arlen is really a rogue cannon.

Pingback| 3.4.09 @ 7:46AM

Commentary » Blog Archive » Flotsam and Jetsam links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…despite these policies, rather than because of them.” Phil Klein reports that the healthcare czarina made a fortune on boards of companies which will now come under her purview. Not very changey. James Antle asks some good questions about Specter and his seat. Steny Hoyer says the president can’t do anything about earmarks. “Won’t” is more accurate. There is this veto thing. Chris…

Pingback| 3.4.09 @ 11:33AM

Haunted by Specter, Cont’d — But As For Me links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

Haunted by Specter, Cont’d — But As For Me .addtoany_share_save

Zoltan Newberry| 3.4.09 @ 12:02PM

And, what about the babes from Maine?
Why is Maine such a weird state?
They seem like lovely, interesting people.
Why can't they "get it?"

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by W. James Antle, III

http://spectator.org/blog/2009/03/03/haunted-by-specter-contd
ADVERTISEMENT

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Who Castrated Ann Coulter?

David Catron | 2.6.12

The Delousing of a Movement

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 2.9.12

Justice Ginsburg Should Resign

William Tucker | 2.8.12

The Audacity of Obama's Secularism

George Neumayr | 2.7.12

Coulter Care

Peter Ferrara | 2.8.12

Thank Him, Santorum!

Jay D. Homnick | 2.8.12

Let Mrs. Obama Eat Red Velvet Cake

Aaron Goldstein | 2.7.12

ADVERTISEMENT