So often the Democrats give the impression that they love
humanity but hate people, especially the most vulnerable and
disadvantaged. What else could explain the campaign to
eliminate the scholarships now provided to allow a
few children to escape the horrid D.C. public schools?
President Barack Obama doesn't send his kids to these
schools. Sen. Ted Kennedy sure never sent his kids to
them. Even some public school teachers don't send
their kids to them. Obviously, the support of teachers'
unions matters more to most Democrats than the interests of
children.
Get use to it kiddies. Obama doesn't care about you, never has,
never will, and will make sure to destroy your futures to gather
votes to keep him and the dems (that control that mess of a city
by the way) in power. But don't worry. If you just vote for them
one last time, they'll fix it for sure...
Chris Long| 3.2.09 @ 3:29PM
Obama's epitome of elitism and condescension toward those
children in D.C. who still have hope, in spite of their own
government's determination to stamp it out.
It really IS all about the NEA union and its still unflagging
support for Liberal causes in general and, specifically, every
crackpot education fad that ever came along.
Let's face it: schools are where the Liberals implement Phase One
of their social engineering schema, the ability to reach your
children at will, without your ability to 'interfere', with any
message they see fit to hammer home.
Everything in public schools , from the racial and ethnic mix, to
the gay-themed morality tales, to the carefully crafted political
message is scripted.
Indeed, to see the Politically Correct, minority-themed handouts
children bring home these days as 'homework', to be pored over in
the intimacy of their own homes clearly show the war is lost.
Printed from a few websites the NEA endorses, the PC handouts
delve into matters from the Indian princess who allegedly founded
the state of Georgia to the time-honored theme of blacks
victimized at the hands of evil white men. The assertion that
most minorities are victims in perpetuity and somehow wards of
the government is a continual theme.
In my view, keeping children in those types of schools is the
height of parental irresponsibility...
Real American| 3.2.09 @ 4:01PM
Liberals don't love the little people and disadvantaged. They
simply use those people as political props as a means of
acquiring more power. they love controlling people.
And the poor and disadvantaged are much easier to control, that's
also why the libs claim to love them so much. That's why liberal
policies don't raise people out of poverty, but rather keep them
there where they can be controlled. That's why liberals hate
capitalism - they can't control it or the people in it.
Well said, Real American, and Liberals don't cotton to them
Home-Schoolers, Vouchers or Charter Schools either. Who would
have the impertinence to offer any meaningful alternative to
these failed public (actually government) schools.
jr| 3.2.09 @ 4:45PM
If they grow up outside the government schools, they may have
learned to read, calculate, and may have even read the
Constitution.
ruth| 3.2.09 @ 5:06PM
Liberalism would die if people knew how to think analytically,
instead of FEEL their way through life.
Alan Brooks| 3.2.09 @ 7:30PM
social 'progress' is finished.
game over.
Alan Brooks| 3.2.09 @ 10:42PM
education can't go anywhere until segregation in schools is
returned-- segregating the smart from the dumb.
and how likely do you think that is?
Crusader| 3.2.09 @ 10:54PM
Alan, education is done. If you are smart and black, you get
accused of "acting white." Meanwhile white kids are all wearing
their hats cockeyed and pants that are too big and listening to
gangsta rap. Sure sign the civilization is on the steep decline
is when the superior culture embraces aspects of the inferior
culture.
Now pass da blunt and de 40 while I hike my drawers up so' mo'!
Alan Brooks| 3.2.09 @ 11:13PM
adolescent macho culture rules?
then it is finished-- should have left it at "game over".
stan redmond| 3.2.09 @ 3:03PM
Get use to it kiddies. Obama doesn't care about you, never has, never will, and will make sure to destroy your futures to gather votes to keep him and the dems (that control that mess of a city by the way) in power. But don't worry. If you just vote for them one last time, they'll fix it for sure...
Chris Long| 3.2.09 @ 3:29PM
Obama's epitome of elitism and condescension toward those children in D.C. who still have hope, in spite of their own government's determination to stamp it out.
It really IS all about the NEA union and its still unflagging support for Liberal causes in general and, specifically, every crackpot education fad that ever came along.
Let's face it: schools are where the Liberals implement Phase One of their social engineering schema, the ability to reach your children at will, without your ability to 'interfere', with any message they see fit to hammer home.
Everything in public schools , from the racial and ethnic mix, to the gay-themed morality tales, to the carefully crafted political message is scripted.
Indeed, to see the Politically Correct, minority-themed handouts children bring home these days as 'homework', to be pored over in the intimacy of their own homes clearly show the war is lost. Printed from a few websites the NEA endorses, the PC handouts delve into matters from the Indian princess who allegedly founded the state of Georgia to the time-honored theme of blacks victimized at the hands of evil white men. The assertion that most minorities are victims in perpetuity and somehow wards of the government is a continual theme.
In my view, keeping children in those types of schools is the height of parental irresponsibility...
Real American| 3.2.09 @ 4:01PM
Liberals don't love the little people and disadvantaged. They simply use those people as political props as a means of acquiring more power. they love controlling people.
And the poor and disadvantaged are much easier to control, that's also why the libs claim to love them so much. That's why liberal policies don't raise people out of poverty, but rather keep them there where they can be controlled. That's why liberals hate capitalism - they can't control it or the people in it.
Pete| 3.2.09 @ 4:40PM
Well said, Real American, and Liberals don't cotton to them Home-Schoolers, Vouchers or Charter Schools either. Who would have the impertinence to offer any meaningful alternative to these failed public (actually government) schools.
jr| 3.2.09 @ 4:45PM
If they grow up outside the government schools, they may have learned to read, calculate, and may have even read the Constitution.
ruth| 3.2.09 @ 5:06PM
Liberalism would die if people knew how to think analytically, instead of FEEL their way through life.
Alan Brooks| 3.2.09 @ 7:30PM
social 'progress' is finished.
game over.
Alan Brooks| 3.2.09 @ 10:42PM
education can't go anywhere until segregation in schools is returned-- segregating the smart from the dumb.
and how likely do you think that is?
Crusader| 3.2.09 @ 10:54PM
Alan, education is done. If you are smart and black, you get accused of "acting white." Meanwhile white kids are all wearing their hats cockeyed and pants that are too big and listening to gangsta rap. Sure sign the civilization is on the steep decline is when the superior culture embraces aspects of the inferior culture.
Now pass da blunt and de 40 while I hike my drawers up so' mo'!
Alan Brooks| 3.2.09 @ 11:13PM
adolescent macho culture rules?
then it is finished-- should have left it at "game over".