The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Although critics of the U.S. health care system speak of 46 million uninsured, the vast majority of them are middle-to-upper income people who self-insure, healthy young people who don't buy insurance, and lower-income people who are eligible for other health care programs.  There are about eight million people who are chronically uninsured and have few alternatives.

The problem of no insurance obviously is most acute in states where health insurance is most expensive.  Like New York.  The New York Times recently wrote about young adults who can't afford health insurance:

"My first reaction was to start laughing - I just kept saying, ‘No way, no way,' " Alanna Boyd, a 28-year-old receptionist, recalled of the $17,398 - including $13 for the use of a television - that she was charged after spending 46 hours in October at Beth Israel Medical Center in Manhattan with diverticulitis, a digestive illness. "I could have gone to a major university for a year. Instead, I went to the hospital for two days."

In the parlance of the health care industry, Ms. Boyd, whose case remains unresolved, is among the "young invincibles" - people in their 20s who shun insurance either because their age makes them feel invulnerable or because expensive policies are out of reach. Young adults are the nation's largest group of uninsured - there were 13.2 million of them nationally in 2007, or 29 percent, according to the latest figures from the Commonwealth Fund, a nonprofit research group in New York.

Gov. David A. Paterson of New York has proposed allowing parents to claim these young adults as dependents for insurance purposes up to age 29, as more than two dozen other states have done in the past decade. Community Catalyst, a Boston-based health care consumer advocacy group, released a report this month urging states to ease eligibility requirements to allow adult children access to their parents' coverage.

"There's a big sense of urgency," said Susan Sherry, the deputy director of Community Catalyst. She described uninsured young adults as especially vulnerable. "People are losing their jobs, and a lot of jobs don't carry health insurance. They're new to the work force, they've been covered under their parents or school plans, and then they drop off the cliff."

It's a genuine problem, but the Times didn't bother to explain why health insurance is so expensive in New York.  First, the state mandates coverage of lots of conditions that don't interest most young people, raising costs.  Indeed, nationwide there are more than 1000 mandates, for everything from hair transplants to Viagra.  Second, New York engages in community rating, that it, the state forbids insurers from adjusting premiums for risk.  So healthy 21-year-olds pay the same as unhealthy 55-year-olds, which in practice means the former subsidize the latter--who usually are making a lot more money.  And for every 21-year-old who steps out of the health care marketplace, like those mentioned in the Times story, the cost rises for the ones who remain.

Fixing the health care system won't be easy, but adding government controls and mandates surely is not the answer.

View all comments (3) | Leave a comment

Mark Anthony| 2.26.09 @ 6:49AM

It's a genuine problem, but the Times didn't bother to explain why health insurance is so expensive in New York. First, the state mandates coverage of lots of conditions that don't interest most young people, raising costs.

Alan Brooks| 2.26.09 @ 1:45PM

why should cancer patients get "prosthetic" hair paid for? they can buy cheap wigs on their own.

anyway, social progress is over, some will live to be 40, some 140. you dont believe me now but you will later.

Dan D.| 2.26.09 @ 6:32PM

If the $634 Billion is any indication of Obama's health care plan, Obama is planning a radical change in the health care system. The plan has not yet been laid out and already Obama is earmarking more than half a trillion for it and explaining that it will just be the beginning of what will be necessary.

One of the reasons that health care seems to be so expensive (among many others) is the cost of research and development in order to procure new treatments and drugs.

At the moment the health care industry has a significant incentive to pour money into research and development because of the possibility of making money. What will happen when this incentive is marginalized when the government has taken over the health care system? Will our advancements slow down or even cease?

http://www.weeklypoint.com/2009/02/26/obama-budget-plans-634-billion-down-payment-for-health-care-reform/

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by Doug Bandow

http://spectator.org/blog/2009/02/26/the-perils-of-health-care-refo

ADVERTISEMENT

The Spectacle Blog

Sulllivan Silliness

Ross Kaminsky | 5:40PM

Meghan McCain Doesn't Get It

Jeffrey Lord | 1:36PM

The Paul Factor

W. James Antle, III | 1:29PM

Bain v. Solyndra

W. James Antle, III | 12:11PM

Illusionist

Yogi Love | 10:06AM

At Least He Apologized

Ross Kaminsky | 8:34AM

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

Terror by Any Other Name

Robert Stacy McCain | 5.29.12

The White House Sieve

Jed Babbin | 5.29.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

Osceola Who?

Reid Collins | 5.29.12

The Bain of Romney's Existence

W. James Antle | 5.29.12

ADVERTISEMENT