Although critics of the U.S. health care system speak of 46
million uninsured, the vast majority of them are middle-to-upper
income people who self-insure, healthy young people who don't buy
insurance, and lower-income people who are eligible for
other health care programs. There are about eight million
people who are chronically uninsured and have few alternatives.
The problem of no insurance obviously is most acute in states
where health insurance is most expensive. Like New
York. The
New York Times recently wrote about young adults who
can't afford health insurance:
"My first reaction was to start laughing - I just kept saying,
‘No way, no way,' " Alanna Boyd, a 28-year-old
receptionist, recalled of the $17,398 - including $13 for the
use of a television - that she was charged after spending 46
hours in October at Beth
Israel Medical Center in Manhattan with diverticulitis,
a digestive illness. "I could have gone to a major university
for a year. Instead, I went to the hospital for two days."
In the parlance of the health care industry, Ms. Boyd, whose
case remains unresolved, is among the "young invincibles" -
people in their 20s who shun insurance either because their age
makes them feel invulnerable or because expensive policies are
out of reach. Young adults are the nation's largest group of
uninsured - there were 13.2 million of them nationally in 2007,
or 29 percent, according to the latest figures from the
Commonwealth Fund, a nonprofit research group in New York.
Gov. David A.
Paterson of New York has proposed allowing parents to claim
these young adults as dependents for insurance purposes up to
age 29, as more than two dozen other states have done in the
past decade. Community Catalyst, a Boston-based health care
consumer advocacy group, released a report this month urging
states to ease eligibility requirements to allow adult children
access to their parents' coverage.
"There's a big sense of urgency," said Susan Sherry, the deputy
director of Community Catalyst. She described uninsured young
adults as especially vulnerable. "People are losing their jobs,
and a lot of jobs don't carry
health insurance. They're new to the work force, they've
been covered under their parents or school plans, and then they
drop off the cliff."
It's a genuine problem, but the Times didn't bother to
explain why health insurance is so expensive in New York.
First, the state mandates coverage of lots of conditions that
don't interest most young people, raising costs. Indeed,
nationwide there are more than 1000 mandates, for everything from
hair transplants to Viagra. Second, New York engages in
community rating, that it, the state forbids insurers from
adjusting premiums for risk. So healthy 21-year-olds pay
the same as unhealthy 55-year-olds, which in practice means the
former subsidize the latter--who usually are making a lot
more money. And for every 21-year-old who steps out of the
health care marketplace, like those mentioned in the
Times story, the cost rises for the ones who remain.
Fixing the health care system won't be easy, but adding
government controls and mandates surely is not the answer.
It's a genuine problem, but the Times didn't bother to explain
why health insurance is so expensive in New York. First, the
state mandates coverage of lots of conditions that don't interest
most young people, raising costs.
Alan Brooks| 2.26.09 @ 1:45PM
why should cancer patients get "prosthetic" hair paid for? they
can buy cheap wigs on their own.
anyway, social progress is over, some will live to be 40, some
140. you dont believe me now but you will later.
If the $634 Billion is any indication of Obama's health care
plan, Obama is planning a radical change in the health care
system. The plan has not yet been laid out and already Obama is
earmarking more than half a trillion for it and explaining that
it will just be the beginning of what will be necessary.
One of the reasons that health care seems to be so expensive
(among many others) is the cost of research and development in
order to procure new treatments and drugs.
At the moment the health care industry has a significant
incentive to pour money into research and development because of
the possibility of making money. What will happen when this
incentive is marginalized when the government has taken over the
health care system? Will our advancements slow down or even
cease?
Mark Anthony| 2.26.09 @ 6:49AM
It's a genuine problem, but the Times didn't bother to explain why health insurance is so expensive in New York. First, the state mandates coverage of lots of conditions that don't interest most young people, raising costs.
Alan Brooks| 2.26.09 @ 1:45PM
why should cancer patients get "prosthetic" hair paid for? they can buy cheap wigs on their own.
anyway, social progress is over, some will live to be 40, some 140. you dont believe me now but you will later.
Dan D.| 2.26.09 @ 6:32PM
If the $634 Billion is any indication of Obama's health care plan, Obama is planning a radical change in the health care system. The plan has not yet been laid out and already Obama is earmarking more than half a trillion for it and explaining that it will just be the beginning of what will be necessary.
One of the reasons that health care seems to be so expensive (among many others) is the cost of research and development in order to procure new treatments and drugs.
At the moment the health care industry has a significant incentive to pour money into research and development because of the possibility of making money. What will happen when this incentive is marginalized when the government has taken over the health care system? Will our advancements slow down or even cease?
http://www.weeklypoint.com/2009/02/26/obama-budget-plans-634-billion-down-payment-for-health-care-reform/