In the wake of Joseph Lawler's piece on George Mason economists evaluating conservative magazines' affinity for liberty on the basis of their treatment of sex, gambling, and drugs, Princeton's Robert George is the perfect antidote. He could have reminded the measurers of liberty that those who favor laissez faire with regard to vice are often much less friendly to consensual acts of capitalism between adults. It's a point he made in his seminal book Making Men Moral.
I'm currently attending a Union University conference honoring the work of Robert P. George. If conservatives are to have a chance of winning the argument over the proper balance of liberty and virtue, they could do no better than to look to Professor George as an example. As Russell Moore reminded the audience this evening, Robert George has never imitated the tendencies of many conservative and/or Christian academics to make themselves or their work more palatable to the ambient culture. Instead, he has unapologetically argued for a robust conception of the natural law and has mentored many academics to follow in his footsteps.
Crusader| 2.26.09 @ 9:24AM
That's the lib paradox. They are all for "choice" when it comes to killing an unborn baby, or with whom to have sex. But choice when it comes to where to send the kid to school (vouchers) or maybe to whom I want to sell my gun (close the "gun show loophole")? No.
Alan Brooks| 2.26.09 @ 9:35AM
if you go to a campus and say "I'm gay", the response is "oh, how nice".
if you say "sex is not my thing, man", they look at you funny. the tyranny of licentiousness has replaced repression.
topsy turvy.