The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

J.P. and Dave have kicked around some criticisms of the PJTV business model which I won't bother to dissect in any detail. I am friends with Roger Simon, Stephen Green, Ed Driscoll and other PajamasMedia people, and have written for PJM. So I have a wee bit of insight on their operation, and I don't want to talk out of school, but here's some background:

PJTV's "Beta" launch was during the Democratic National Convention in Denver, where I hung out a lot with the PJ crew (in fact I was crashing at Steve Green's place). They shot a lot of video footage of man-in-the-street stuff, event coverage and "Oh, look, it's another crazy lefty peacenik protest." Then they put a lot of time into editing these into program segments. Then the word came back: "This is not what we want." And so, when they went to Minneapolis the next week for their coverage of the Republican convention, they didn't do any of that stuff, but instead produced sit-down interviews of GOP VIPs. 

What I gathered -- and this was really just third- or fourth-hand hearsay -- was that the investors in PJTV did not like the event-coverage type of production. The investors wanted more of a virtual-newsroom-set-with-guest-interviews format. Well, maybe you don't like the talking-head discussion approach that seems to be the basic PJTV model, but what you like or don't like is much less important than what the investors want. "Money talks," and you know the rest of that saying.

On the more general topic of what works and what doesn't work on the Internet, and what role ideology plays in establishing an audience, I have always tried to view journalism through the eyes of the average reader. It's a customer-service approach: What does the reader like? What catches his eye and makes him want to spend 50 cents to buy a paper?

The customer-service approach requires a certain amount of trial-and-error: "Hey, let's see if they like it if we do X." And if they don't like X, you try Y, and if Y doesn't work, you try Z. But once you find what the customer wants -- when something clearly works, and the readership responds -- you do more of that. There is no particular logic evident in Two All-Beef Patties, Special Sauce, Lettuce, Cheese, Pickle, Onions on a Sesame See Bun, but the Big Mac sells, and so McDonalds keeps selling it.

I haven't been blogging as much at AmSpec the past couple of weeks, and I apologize for my inattention, but this past week, my personal blog cleared a major milestone -- 1 million visits -- and so I re-designed the blog and celebrated with a post entitled, "How to Get a Million Hits on Your Blog in Less Than a Year."

No investors have offered me big bucks, but the readers seem to like it. Or hate it. And the weird thing is, it doesn't seem to matter whether they like it or hate it, so long as they read it. The customer service approach is kind of different in the blogosphere.

View all comments (4) | Leave a comment

Mary| 2.21.09 @ 11:00AM

I like watching PJTV. My only complaint is that there is a cheapness to the sets and set-ups, etc.

When The New Majority opened up for business I thought the site looked cheap too.

I think stuff like that makes a difference.

Also, Culture 11, The New Majority and PJTV all have a bloodless quality. That may be because parts are never as great as their sum.
Sort of like the Beatles: "I still blame Yoko!"

Michelle Malkin and "The Davidian Branch" and others are really not on the same side because their differences are of kind and not degreee.

I like Glenn Reynolds and Dr. Helen a lot.

Say what you want about Democrats and the Left but they're not bloodless.

K~Bob| 2.21.09 @ 4:42PM

Real-time media are a tough sell. Who wants to have their eyeballs stuck in one place for more than 30 seconds? Radio and audio files over the web (netcasts, podcasts, mp3s, etc) at least allow you to listen while you get up and do stuff.

When I'm at the computer, I can read the entire day's posts from spectator.org rss feeds in the time it takes Glenn and Dr. Helen to get past the introductory matter of one show. I like them fine, but I rarely have that kind of time to waste when I'm klobberin' keys at the computer.

Alan Brooks| 2.21.09 @ 8:09PM

um, yes, modern e-lectronics have shortened our attenhun spans.

Alan Brooks| 2.22.09 @ 10:53PM

look at how kids can barely concentrate. that's progress; the new, the In.

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by Robert Stacy McCain

http://spectator.org/blog/2009/02/21/re-pjtv-and-notes-on-blogosphe

ADVERTISEMENT

The Spectacle Blog

Sulllivan Silliness

Ross Kaminsky | 5:40PM

Meghan McCain Doesn't Get It

Jeffrey Lord | 1:36PM

The Paul Factor

W. James Antle, III | 1:29PM

Bain v. Solyndra

W. James Antle, III | 12:11PM

Illusionist

Yogi Love | 10:06AM

At Least He Apologized

Ross Kaminsky | 8:34AM

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

Terror by Any Other Name

Robert Stacy McCain | 5.29.12

The White House Sieve

Jed Babbin | 5.29.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

Osceola Who?

Reid Collins | 5.29.12

The Bain of Romney's Existence

W. James Antle | 5.29.12

ADVERTISEMENT