J.P.
and Dave
have kicked around some criticisms of the PJTV business model which I won't
bother to dissect in any detail. I am friends with Roger Simon, Stephen Green,
Ed Driscoll and
other PajamasMedia people,
and have written
for PJM. So I have a wee bit of insight on their operation,
and I don't want to talk out of school, but here's some
background:
PJTV's "Beta" launch was during the Democratic National
Convention in Denver, where
I hung out a lot with the PJ crew (in fact I was
crashing at Steve Green's place). They shot a lot of video
footage of man-in-the-street stuff, event coverage and "Oh, look,
it's another crazy lefty peacenik protest." Then they
put a lot of time into editing these into program
segments. Then the word came back: "This is not what we
want." And so, when they went to Minneapolis the next week for
their coverage of the Republican convention, they didn't do any
of that stuff, but instead produced sit-down interviews
of GOP VIPs.
What I gathered -- and this was really just third-
or fourth-hand hearsay -- was that the investors in PJTV
did not like the event-coverage type of production. The
investors wanted more of a
virtual-newsroom-set-with-guest-interviews format.
Well, maybe you don't like the talking-head
discussion approach that seems to be the basic PJTV model, but
what you like or don't like is much less important than what
the investors want. "Money talks," and you know the rest of
that saying.
On the more general topic of what works and what doesn't work on
the Internet, and what role ideology plays in establishing an
audience, I have always tried to view journalism through the eyes
of the average reader. It's a customer-service approach: What
does the reader like? What catches his eye and makes him want to
spend 50 cents to buy a paper?
The customer-service approach requires a certain amount of
trial-and-error: "Hey, let's see if they like it if we do X." And
if they don't like X, you try Y, and if Y doesn't work, you try
Z. But once you find what the customer wants -- when something
clearly works, and the readership responds -- you
do more of that. There is no particular logic evident in Two
All-Beef Patties, Special Sauce, Lettuce, Cheese, Pickle, Onions
on a Sesame See Bun, but the Big Mac sells, and so
McDonalds keeps selling it.
No investors have offered me big bucks, but the readers seem
to like it.
Or hate it. And the weird thing is, it doesn't seem to
matter whether they like it or hate it, so long as they
read it. The customer service approach is kind of
different in the blogosphere.
I like watching PJTV. My only complaint is that there is a
cheapness to the sets and set-ups, etc.
When The New Majority opened up for business I thought the site
looked cheap too.
I think stuff like that makes a difference.
Also, Culture 11, The New Majority and PJTV all have a bloodless
quality. That may be because parts are never as great as their
sum.
Sort of like the Beatles: "I still blame Yoko!"
Michelle Malkin and "The Davidian Branch" and others are really
not on the same side because their differences are of kind and
not degreee.
I like Glenn Reynolds and Dr. Helen a lot.
Say what you want about Democrats and the Left but they're not
bloodless.
K~Bob| 2.21.09 @ 4:42PM
Real-time media are a tough sell. Who wants to have their
eyeballs stuck in one place for more than 30 seconds? Radio and
audio files over the web (netcasts, podcasts, mp3s, etc) at least
allow you to listen while you get up and do stuff.
When I'm at the computer, I can read the entire day's posts from
spectator.org rss feeds in the time it takes Glenn and Dr. Helen
to get past the introductory matter of one show. I like them
fine, but I rarely have that kind of time to waste when I'm
klobberin' keys at the computer.
Alan Brooks| 2.21.09 @ 8:09PM
um, yes, modern e-lectronics have shortened our attenhun spans.
Alan Brooks| 2.22.09 @ 10:53PM
look at how kids can barely concentrate. that's progress; the
new, the In.
Mary| 2.21.09 @ 11:00AM
I like watching PJTV. My only complaint is that there is a cheapness to the sets and set-ups, etc.
When The New Majority opened up for business I thought the site looked cheap too.
I think stuff like that makes a difference.
Also, Culture 11, The New Majority and PJTV all have a bloodless quality. That may be because parts are never as great as their sum.
Sort of like the Beatles: "I still blame Yoko!"
Michelle Malkin and "The Davidian Branch" and others are really not on the same side because their differences are of kind and not degreee.
I like Glenn Reynolds and Dr. Helen a lot.
Say what you want about Democrats and the Left but they're not bloodless.
K~Bob| 2.21.09 @ 4:42PM
Real-time media are a tough sell. Who wants to have their eyeballs stuck in one place for more than 30 seconds? Radio and audio files over the web (netcasts, podcasts, mp3s, etc) at least allow you to listen while you get up and do stuff.
When I'm at the computer, I can read the entire day's posts from spectator.org rss feeds in the time it takes Glenn and Dr. Helen to get past the introductory matter of one show. I like them fine, but I rarely have that kind of time to waste when I'm klobberin' keys at the computer.
Alan Brooks| 2.21.09 @ 8:09PM
um, yes, modern e-lectronics have shortened our attenhun spans.
Alan Brooks| 2.22.09 @ 10:53PM
look at how kids can barely concentrate. that's progress; the new, the In.