The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Ross Douthat is making sense about the centrists. There is an economic theory behind massive public spending in the face of a recession of this magnitude, even if I think the evidence overwhelmingly suggests this theory is wrong. There is an economic theory behind the idea that this amounts to pouring gasoline on an open fire, the view I incline toward. But what's the theory behind the idea we need an $800 billion stimulus package rather than a $900 billion one? It can't be that we don't have the money for $900 billion, because we don't have the money for $800 billion either. The only reason can be the mindless centrism Douthat identifies: "Take what the party in power wants, subtract as much money as you can without infuriating them, vote yes, and declare victory."

Here's the trouble (besides the fact it will lead to the enactment of this mess): "But thanks to the centrists, we're getting the cheapskate version of the gargantuan version: They've done absolutely nothing to widen the terms of debate about what should go into the bill, and they've shaved off just enough money to reduce its effectiveness if Paul Krugman is right - but not nearly enough to make it fiscally prudent if the stimulus skeptics are right. This means that if the damn thing doesn't work, we won't even know whom to blame. But it wouldn't be crazy to start by blaming the centrists." I'd change the "if" in his penultimate sentence to "when," but it seems about right to me.

View all comments (2) | Leave a comment

Roy| 2.9.09 @ 4:58PM

The answer is, it won't do anything. The economy will recover anyway. Paul Krugman and his spokesman, Barack Obama, will loudly claim vindication. The rest of the media will amplify that claim.

The centrists will be able to run around talking about what brave, bold, daring mavericks they are, which is their primary goal under any circumstances.

And we'll all be poorer than we otherwise would have been - and just that much closer to the big time crash when the government can't borrow any more.

Sooner_Red| 2.9.09 @ 10:51PM

If 800 billion will "save or create 4 million jobs" (if you say that over and over, you will achieve inner peace and hope), why not 800 TRILLION, and create 4 billion jobs? It's just debt, why not go all out???

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by W. James Antle, III

http://spectator.org/blog/2009/02/09/the-center-doesnt-hold

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

Follow Me

Jay D. Homnick | 5.25.12

A Test of National Honor

Hal G.P. Colebatch | 5.25.12

How About the Record of DOE Capital?

William Tucker | 5.25.12

The Great Debate

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.24.12

ADVERTISEMENT