In remarks at the White House, Obama argued that
recalcitrant lawmakers need to get behind his approach, saying
the American people embraced his ideas when they elected him
president in November.
Sadly, it will likely take more than Hope (TM) to disband
Congress and crown us an emperor, the results of November's
presidential election notwithstanding. Sure, Obama counters, you
can dissent--it'll just be "a catastrophe." It's the President's
prerogative to call it like he sees it, but isn't such a
disputable dire pronouncement pretty much exactly the excuse
Democrats gave after the fact for having been deceived/forced
into voting for the Patriot Act and the Iraq war against their
self-proclaimed better separation-of-powers instincts? This sort
of the-Executive-Branch-speaks-you-shut-up-and-follow routine
must come as a disappointment to people like CNN anchor Jami
Floyd,
who lectured on the occasion of Barack Obama's visit to the
Supreme Court scant weeks ago that:
Barack Obama knows what President Bush apparently does not—that
ours is a constitutional system of government; that the
president serves at the pleasure of the American public; that
the rule of law applies to all Americans even our chief
executive; and, that presidential powers do not give the
president unlimited authority to undermine our Constitution.
There are three branches of government, after all, and with
good reason. The executive is just one of those. With
today’s visit our next President signals that he will fully
respect the role of the other two—the legislative, with whom he
must work everyday to best serve the American people, and the
judiciary to which we all must answer.
In fairness to President Obama, it would be easier to
fully respect the legislative branch if they'd just go ahead and
do what he says already. Hopefully it's a lesson the Supreme
Court is taking to heart. Until then--aw, sorry Jami, looks like
the
Cult of the Presidency lives!
UPDATE: As she notes in the comments section
(presuming it is her!), Floyd is actually a contributor to the
AC360 blog and anchors her own show on trueTV ("Not Reality.
Actuality.") I sincerely apologize for suggesting she might be a
CNN anchor rather than an anchor for a reality television network
who moonlights as a blogger for a certain
silver-haired fox of a CNN anchor, which, as our most recent
ex-president might say, is...awesome! With regard to the merits
of working for both Al Gore and
Hillary Clinton before becoming a journalist, however, Floyd
is entirely on her own.
BD57| 2.4.09 @ 3:55PM
Floyd's blog post is an embarrassing two-fer, one part "hack attack" on Bush, one part "slobbering sycophancy" for Obama.
JAMI FLOYD| 2.4.09 @ 4:13PM
please correct your blog post. i am NOT an anchor at CNN. i am a contributor to the AC 360 Blog. thank you.
Alan Brooks| 2.4.09 @ 4:20PM
how do they know you are the Real Jami Floyd?
ruth| 2.4.09 @ 6:23PM
Doesn't matter where Jami works, she's still a hypocritical libtard. Eat your words, sycophant!
Ron Robinson| 2.5.09 @ 4:18AM
Obama needs to remember that one of our important principles is to try not to allow the majority to tyrannize the minority.
He should also remember that he only needs to change the minds of about 4% of of voters and he is out in 2012.