Philip, I utterly agree about the penalties. But I would go
farther: I think the refs were FAR too obtrusive AND far too
often wrong. I think they blew some calls, especially on the
sorts of calls that involved plays that were "no harm/no foul"
type of situations.
The roughing the passer call against the Cards was terrible, for
instance. Outrageously bad. If a man that big is moving that
fast, he can't be expected to stop short. When he hit
Roethlisberger, he did extend his hands -- but he also actually
pulled up, rather than continuing to plow into Roethlisberger. he
didn't pile on; he just stopped himself. This is football, not
pattie-cakes. The call stunk.
The holding call in the endzone on the Steelers stunk, too. The
defensive player was bowling over the guard. The guard fell
backwards. The defensive guy fell on top. The defensive guy was
going down regardless. The guard no more "held" him than he did a
deliberate pratfall. He did NOT pull the defensive guy on top of
him on purpose. THe call stunk.
The rushing-into-the-holder call against the Cards stunk, too. It
was, at worst, an unintentional foul, not a personal foul. At
worst it should have been five yards and no automatic first down.
The call stunk.
The final fumble by Warner ought to have been reviewed, with an
official stoppage of play. The officials in the booth may well
have taken a quick look and been convinced, but on a play that
important, they ought to have taken their time, ordered a stop in
play, and reviewed it in very slow motion to be absolutely sure.
The whole game rode in the balance. The call (the refusal to stop
play to do a review) stunk.
The personal foul against the Steelers DB on the sideline in the
fourth quarter was iffy. Yes, he held on a little long after he
had pushed the guy out of bounds. Yes, when the runner objected
by chopping at the DB's arms, the DB retaliated with a tiny
little shove. But it wasn't a punch, wasn't a swing, wasn't
anything more than a harmless skirmish -- and the DB was
surrounded by Cards who were at least as aggressively challenging
him as he was challenging them. MAYBE it was a personal foul,
technically, but if so it barely qualified. Considering the
circumstances, the call stunk.
And I just did all that from memory. There were three or four
other times when I thought the officials should have just let the
players play the damn game. Other than the late personal foul by
James Harrison -- RE-knocking over the Card blocker who alread
was on the ground, after the play was over -- I thought it was a
comparatively clean game. It was NOT out of control in a way that
required such refereeing intervention.
Finally, I still remain unconvinced that Roethlisberger's knee
actually touched ground on his first would-be touchdown. I bet
that as the NFL goes over and over that play again in the days to
come, and uses all the technology at their disposal, they will
find that his knee never actually touched. Unless the original
call was CLEARLY and UNAMBIGUOUSLY wrong, there should not be an
overrule. That's the rule. But the rule was ignored.
Overall, then, the officiating stunk. But the game was absolutely
awesome despite it all.
Good game. Looked like Holmes has his right foot on top of his
left foot and therefore, was the right foot down?? The last
penalty wasn't all that clear. It could have gone either way.
Cards played the best game and the Steelers won. Go figure!!!
Marc Jeric| 2.2.09 @ 6:01PM
In the Pittsburgh-Seattle superbowl game some years ago th
Seattle QB threw a long pass caught at Steelers' one yard line;
the referee called the penalty on Seattle's QB for illegal block!
Ever heard of such nonsense before - the QB's illegal block after
he threw a 50-yard pass?
Similar funny penalties called against Arizona yesterday and
ignored when committed by Pittaburgh! What is going on with those
referees?
Doug Chance| 2.2.09 @ 6:25PM
I wish people commenting on the refs would learn the rules. There
is no longer a 5 yard version of the penalty for running into the
kicker (or holder). The idea is that they are defenseless and not
fair game. Blame the penalty on the player who ran into the
holder for not knowing the rules.
dk| 2.2.09 @ 3:26PM
Good game. Looked like Holmes has his right foot on top of his left foot and therefore, was the right foot down?? The last penalty wasn't all that clear. It could have gone either way. Cards played the best game and the Steelers won. Go figure!!!
Marc Jeric| 2.2.09 @ 6:01PM
In the Pittsburgh-Seattle superbowl game some years ago th Seattle QB threw a long pass caught at Steelers' one yard line; the referee called the penalty on Seattle's QB for illegal block! Ever heard of such nonsense before - the QB's illegal block after he threw a 50-yard pass?
Similar funny penalties called against Arizona yesterday and ignored when committed by Pittaburgh! What is going on with those referees?
Doug Chance| 2.2.09 @ 6:25PM
I wish people commenting on the refs would learn the rules. There is no longer a 5 yard version of the penalty for running into the kicker (or holder). The idea is that they are defenseless and not fair game. Blame the penalty on the player who ran into the holder for not knowing the rules.