The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Re: The Penalty Bowl

Philip, I utterly agree about the penalties. But I would go farther: I think the refs were FAR too obtrusive AND far too often wrong. I think they blew some calls, especially on the sorts of calls that involved plays that were "no harm/no foul" type of situations.

The roughing the passer call against the Cards was terrible, for instance. Outrageously bad. If a man that big is moving that fast, he can't be expected to stop short. When he hit Roethlisberger, he did extend his hands -- but he also actually pulled up, rather than continuing to plow into Roethlisberger. he didn't pile on; he just stopped himself. This is football, not pattie-cakes. The call stunk.

The holding call in the endzone on the Steelers stunk, too. The defensive player was bowling over the guard. The guard fell backwards. The defensive guy fell on top. The defensive guy was going down regardless. The guard no more "held" him than he did a deliberate pratfall. He did NOT pull the defensive guy on top of him on purpose. THe call stunk.

The rushing-into-the-holder call against the Cards stunk, too. It was, at worst, an unintentional foul, not a personal foul. At worst it should have been five yards and no automatic first down. The call stunk.

The final fumble by Warner ought to have been reviewed, with an official stoppage of play. The officials in the booth may well have taken a quick look and been convinced, but on a play that important, they ought to have taken their time, ordered a stop in play, and reviewed it in very slow motion to be absolutely sure. The whole game rode in the balance. The call (the refusal to stop play to do a review) stunk.

The personal foul against the Steelers DB on the sideline in the fourth quarter was iffy. Yes, he held on a little long after he had pushed the guy out of bounds. Yes, when the runner objected by chopping at the DB's arms, the DB retaliated with a tiny little shove. But it wasn't a punch, wasn't a swing, wasn't anything more than a harmless skirmish -- and the DB was surrounded by Cards who were at least as aggressively challenging him as he was challenging them. MAYBE it was a personal foul, technically, but if so it barely qualified. Considering the circumstances, the call stunk.

And I just did all that from memory. There were three or four other times when I thought the officials should have just let the players play the damn game. Other than the late personal foul by James Harrison -- RE-knocking over the Card blocker who alread was on the ground, after the play was over -- I thought it was a comparatively clean game. It was NOT out of control in a way that required such refereeing intervention.

Finally, I still remain unconvinced that Roethlisberger's knee actually touched ground on his first would-be touchdown. I bet that as the NFL goes over and over that play again in the days to come, and uses all the technology at their disposal, they will find that his knee never actually touched. Unless the original call was CLEARLY and UNAMBIGUOUSLY wrong, there should not be an overrule. That's the rule. But the rule was ignored.

Overall, then, the officiating stunk. But the game was absolutely awesome despite it all.

View all comments (3) | Leave a comment

dk| 2.2.09 @ 3:26PM

Good game. Looked like Holmes has his right foot on top of his left foot and therefore, was the right foot down?? The last penalty wasn't all that clear. It could have gone either way. Cards played the best game and the Steelers won. Go figure!!!

Marc Jeric| 2.2.09 @ 6:01PM

In the Pittsburgh-Seattle superbowl game some years ago th Seattle QB threw a long pass caught at Steelers' one yard line; the referee called the penalty on Seattle's QB for illegal block! Ever heard of such nonsense before - the QB's illegal block after he threw a 50-yard pass?
Similar funny penalties called against Arizona yesterday and ignored when committed by Pittaburgh! What is going on with those referees?

Doug Chance| 2.2.09 @ 6:25PM

I wish people commenting on the refs would learn the rules. There is no longer a 5 yard version of the penalty for running into the kicker (or holder). The idea is that they are defenseless and not fair game. Blame the penalty on the player who ran into the holder for not knowing the rules.

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by Quin Hillyer

http://spectator.org/blog/2009/02/02/re-the-penalty-bowl

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

Follow Me

Jay D. Homnick | 5.25.12

A Test of National Honor

Hal G.P. Colebatch | 5.25.12

How About the Record of DOE Capital?

William Tucker | 5.25.12

The Great Debate

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.24.12

ADVERTISEMENT