The American Spectator

Alan Brooks| 1.28.09 @ 8:17PM

change but no hope.

hope for what? hope that five years we'll be back to the situation we were in in 2000?
one step forward, two steps backward.

Alan Brooks| 1.28.09 @ 8:19PM

great. in 2014 we'll be back to the economic situation of 2000; that's progress.

Louise Workman| 1.28.09 @ 9:17PM

This is not a stimulus bill, it is a PORK bill. Government has caused all of this economic mess and they need to step aside and let the private sector get us out. Government needs to have massive spending cuts and even eliminate some useless departments that just suck up tax payer money. Give the working people more of their money and watch the economy take off.

Spicy Joker| 1.28.09 @ 9:49PM

I wonder where the rest of the "fiscally conservative" Blue Dog Democrats were.

Alan Brooks| 1.28.09 @ 10:06PM

at least it isn't 1 trillion
or 999,999,999 million.
that would look bad in the newspapers.

tony| 1.28.09 @ 10:29PM

As a republican, I'm overcome with a sense of hope (LOL).

Alan Brooks| 1.28.09 @ 10:31PM

headline :
more billions needed for banks, mortgages. i kid you not.

Crusader| 1.29.09 @ 12:06AM

I could use $100,000. Maybe if I promise not to have any more kids nan will let me have it?

Alan Brooks| 1.29.09 @ 12:16AM

good idea...alrighty then,
if I promise not to have twins,
can i have $200,000?

sidnee| 12.12.09 @ 12:47PM

jack wills
ugg new arrivals