The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Obama's Mandate

According to this Washington Post poll, it's much less intimidating than I would have thought. Asked, "Do you think Obama has a mandate to carry out the agenda he presented during the presidential campaign, or should he compromise on the things the Republicans strongly oppose?" more Americans said he had a mandate, but only by a margin of 50 percent to 46 percent. Given his high approval ratings and Democratic control of Congress, Obama is pretty much going to get what he wants. However, this poll reminds us how tenuous the mandate is even for a tremendously popular president. Obama understands this, which is why he is eager to get Republican support that he doesn't need. For Republicans, there's no need to strengthen Obama's hand by giving him bipartisan cover for a bad bill that will balloon the deficit without helping the economy.

View all comments (2) | Leave a comment

JP| 1.27.09 @ 1:48PM

Perhaps it is now dawning on our new President what he got himself into. The President and his party can pass this awful bill without one GOP vote. But with the worst of periods of unemployment still waiting for us, he knows the electorate is expecting him to deliver. Passing the "stimulus" package is one thing. Being held responsible for it is quite another. Despite his high initial poll numbers, President Obama has got to realize his popularity is only transient.

Much has already been done to address the causes of this recession (cash infusions, 0 interest rates, TARP). We may even be able to withstand the downturn without a "stimulus". That is, the economy could actually begin to improve before one nickel of "stimuls" hits the streets (So hopes Obama). But then again, the unemployed are taking this man at his word. If this bill passes without the GOP, and things do not improve but get worse, Obama is in serious political trouble, as is his own party.

The public wasn't too happy with the $750 billion TARP program; I'm sure they will be even less happy with the stimulus once the details are published. Having the GOP go along with it makes sense politically. It would ensure the GOP would no be a danger in 2010, and provide the Dems with cover for the next round of bailouts.

sidnee| 12.12.09 @ 12:56PM

jack wills
ugg new arrivals

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by Philip Klein

http://spectator.org/blog/2009/01/27/obamas-mandate

ADVERTISEMENT

The Spectacle Blog

Illusionist

Yogi Love | 10:06AM

At Least He Apologized

Ross Kaminsky | 8:34AM

Gallup: Veterans Prefer Romney

W. James Antle, III | 5.28.12

Markos Moulitsas is Scum

Quin Hillyer | 5.28.12

Weekend Political Wrap-Up, Memorial Day Edition

W. James Antle, III | 5.27.12

An Honor Flight Story

TAS Staff | 5.26.12

WaPost Criticizes Romney's Lack of Rhythm

Aaron Goldstein | 5.25.12

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

Follow Me

Jay D. Homnick | 5.25.12

Terror by Any Other Name

Robert Stacy McCain | 5.29.12

How About the Record of DOE Capital?

William Tucker | 5.25.12

ADVERTISEMENT