The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Marc Ambinder has some more information on the card check poll I posted earlier, as well as an AFL-CIO poll that shows similarly lopsided margins in favor of the Employee Free Choice Act's key provisions. The results depend heavily on how the questions are worded, with the AFL-CIO leaving out the fact the workers have less privacy in card check events than in secret ballot elections and the anti-card check pollster exaggerating the privacy angle in a highly loaded question. I think Ambinder understates the degree to which card check would stack the deck against secret ballot elections, but his conclusion is correct: card check makes it easier for unions to win than secret ballot elections. The point of the legislation is to increase unionization.

View all comments (4) | Leave a comment

Robert Stacy McCain| 1.26.09 @ 2:49PM

"The results depend heavily on how the questions are worded . . ."

Sic semper hoc.

sidnee| 12.12.09 @ 12:55PM

jack wills
ugg new arrivals

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by W. James Antle, III

http://spectator.org/blog/2009/01/26/more-on-that-card-check-poll
ADVERTISEMENT

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Who Castrated Ann Coulter?

David Catron | 2.6.12

The Delousing of a Movement

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 2.9.12

Justice Ginsburg Should Resign

William Tucker | 2.8.12

The Audacity of Obama's Secularism

George Neumayr | 2.7.12

Coulter Care

Peter Ferrara | 2.8.12

Thank Him, Santorum!

Jay D. Homnick | 2.8.12

Let Mrs. Obama Eat Red Velvet Cake

Aaron Goldstein | 2.7.12

ADVERTISEMENT