The Senate's 94-2 vote to confirm Hillary Clinton as Secretary of
State is a disgrace. There is no previous nominee, EVER, who has
been confirmed for such a high post with so much ethical baggage
PLUS so many conflicts of interest, past and present, including
ones that directly relate to the post for which she was
nominated, PLUS such a thin resume in the subject area, a resume
rightly mocked last year by now-President Obama himself. In the
Great Beyond, John Tower must be fuming, considering how less
important (not unimportant, mind you, but just comparatively far
less important) were the transgressions that blocked him from
being confirmed to head the Pentagon.
Frankly, "disgrace" is not a strong enough word for the
overwhelming confirmation vote. "Obscenity" is more like it. And
all those senators who failed even to do due diligence, to ask a
huge number of basic and very fair questions of HRC, have shown
themselves utterly unserious about their own jobs. They should
hang their heads in shame.
but she wants to grab ahmadinejab by the family jewels.
all we are sayyyying, is give her a chance.
all we are sayyyying, is give war a chance.
Sean| 1.21.09 @ 9:27PM
We need to replace almost all the Republican Senators with some
real conservatives.
Mike | 1.21.09 @ 9:47PM
Sean,
If what you mean by conservative is the philosophy I read at this
site, you mean reactionaries.
ruth| 1.21.09 @ 10:16PM
Mike, thanks so much for your brilliant slam. Your post meant so
much to us.
Alan Brooks| 1.21.09 @ 10:33PM
reactionary is just derogatory for conservative.
mike is a punk.
Jeremiah| 1.21.09 @ 10:43PM
reactionary is just marxist crap! We will bury you Mike.
ruth| 1.22.09 @ 2:55AM
Liberal is just derogatory period.
Hugh| 1.22.09 @ 3:05AM
Easy for you to say, she doesn't have your FBI background files.
Rick Venema| 1.22.09 @ 4:31AM
"Senate" and "shame"? In the same sentence? Oh that's rich,
really. Ha ha. I just spilled my coffee. Ha ha. Further evidence
that there is nothing to distinguish DEMS from REPUBS. They're
all Democrats, they're all rich as a result of leeching the
income of the employed, and we are all in servitude. Shame and
Senate? Stop, your killin' me here.
Alan Brooks| 1.21.09 @ 6:52PM
but she wants to grab ahmadinejab by the family jewels.
all we are sayyyying, is give her a chance.
all we are sayyyying, is give war a chance.
Sean| 1.21.09 @ 9:27PM
We need to replace almost all the Republican Senators with some real conservatives.
Mike | 1.21.09 @ 9:47PM
Sean,
If what you mean by conservative is the philosophy I read at this site, you mean reactionaries.
ruth| 1.21.09 @ 10:16PM
Mike, thanks so much for your brilliant slam. Your post meant so much to us.
Alan Brooks| 1.21.09 @ 10:33PM
reactionary is just derogatory for conservative.
mike is a punk.
Jeremiah| 1.21.09 @ 10:43PM
reactionary is just marxist crap! We will bury you Mike.
ruth| 1.22.09 @ 2:55AM
Liberal is just derogatory period.
Hugh| 1.22.09 @ 3:05AM
Easy for you to say, she doesn't have your FBI background files.
Rick Venema| 1.22.09 @ 4:31AM
"Senate" and "shame"? In the same sentence? Oh that's rich, really. Ha ha. I just spilled my coffee. Ha ha. Further evidence that there is nothing to distinguish DEMS from REPUBS. They're all Democrats, they're all rich as a result of leeching the income of the employed, and we are all in servitude. Shame and Senate? Stop, your killin' me here.
james23| 1.22.09 @ 9:09AM
the Party of Supplication. GOP=Whig.
sidnee| 12.12.09 @ 12:08PM
jack wills
ugg new arrivals