The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Feckless Senate

The Senate's 94-2 vote to confirm Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State is a disgrace. There is no previous nominee, EVER, who has been confirmed for such a high post with so much ethical baggage PLUS so many conflicts of interest, past and present, including ones that directly relate to the post for which she was nominated, PLUS such a thin resume in the subject area, a resume rightly mocked last year by now-President Obama himself. In the Great Beyond, John Tower must be fuming, considering how less important (not unimportant, mind you, but just comparatively far less important) were the transgressions that blocked him from being confirmed to head the Pentagon.

Frankly, "disgrace" is not a strong enough word for the overwhelming confirmation vote. "Obscenity" is more like it. And all those senators who failed even to do due diligence, to ask a huge number of basic and very fair questions of HRC, have shown themselves utterly unserious about their own jobs. They should hang their heads in shame.

View all comments (11) | Leave a comment

Alan Brooks| 1.21.09 @ 6:52PM

but she wants to grab ahmadinejab by the family jewels.

all we are sayyyying, is give her a chance.
all we are sayyyying, is give war a chance.

Sean| 1.21.09 @ 9:27PM

We need to replace almost all the Republican Senators with some real conservatives.

Mike | 1.21.09 @ 9:47PM

Sean,
If what you mean by conservative is the philosophy I read at this site, you mean reactionaries.

ruth| 1.21.09 @ 10:16PM

Mike, thanks so much for your brilliant slam. Your post meant so much to us.

Alan Brooks| 1.21.09 @ 10:33PM

reactionary is just derogatory for conservative.

mike is a punk.

Jeremiah| 1.21.09 @ 10:43PM

reactionary is just marxist crap! We will bury you Mike.

ruth| 1.22.09 @ 2:55AM

Liberal is just derogatory period.

Hugh| 1.22.09 @ 3:05AM

Easy for you to say, she doesn't have your FBI background files.

Rick Venema| 1.22.09 @ 4:31AM

"Senate" and "shame"? In the same sentence? Oh that's rich, really. Ha ha. I just spilled my coffee. Ha ha. Further evidence that there is nothing to distinguish DEMS from REPUBS. They're all Democrats, they're all rich as a result of leeching the income of the employed, and we are all in servitude. Shame and Senate? Stop, your killin' me here.

james23| 1.22.09 @ 9:09AM

the Party of Supplication. GOP=Whig.

sidnee| 12.12.09 @ 12:08PM

jack wills
ugg new arrivals

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by Quin Hillyer

http://spectator.org/blog/2009/01/21/feckless-senate

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

Follow Me

Jay D. Homnick | 5.25.12

A Test of National Honor

Hal G.P. Colebatch | 5.25.12

How About the Record of DOE Capital?

William Tucker | 5.25.12

The Great Debate

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.24.12

ADVERTISEMENT