The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

A Load of BCS

So Florida won the BCS title game last night, in a fairly boring fashion, but Texas, USC, and especially Utah also have legitimate claims to the championship title.

Every year, we run into this same problem. Every year, the BCS suffers abuse from college football commentators ranging from the oft-blustery Michael Wilbon to the revered baseball stats guru Bill James, who clamor for a playoff system that would determine the winner based on performance on the field as opposed to politically biased polls and inscrutable computer rankings.

Even the incoming president has threatened to replace the BCS with an eight-team playoff. As if he didn’t have better things to do.  

There’s no doubt the system is unfair — Auburn in 2004 and LSU in 2003 got shafted, big time. But it’s obvious that there is a tradeoff between a fair bowl system and a compelling regular season.This tradeoff became apparent in 2005, when my team, Notre Dame, played one of the best games ever in the regular season.

First of all, realize that the system would never be fair, playoffs or not. Is it fair that Oklahoma State gets to play in a brand new complex donated by T. Boone Pickens while smaller schools run on a shoe-string budget? Is it fair that Syracuse has to convince high school students from Florida and Texas that it will be fun for them to wake up at 5 AM to practice in -20 degree temperatures? No, it’s not, but the reality of these differences is what lends drama to games.

This inequality makes college football the best regular season sport. It’s why tiny Appalachian State’s upset of giant Michigan in 2007 was so epic. Think — if there had been a playoff system Michigan could conceivably have snuck into the playoffs and then won the championship after losing to Appalachian. A monumental upset would have been reduced to a meaningless opening season stumble that the traditional power shrugged off en route to the playoffs.

The greatest football game I’ve ever seen wasn’t a playoff game. It was, without a doubt, the 2005 showdown between #9 Notre Dame and #1 USC in only the eighth week of the season. The storyline could not have been better if it had been written in a novel. The two traditional superpowers collided with USC riding a 27-game win streak, and the Notre Dame program resurgent under new head coach Charlie Weis. The forecast in South Bend was perfect, and the Hollywood stars were all about. The anticipation crested on the Friday night before the game with a pep rally of 50,000.

The run-up to the game was only outdone by the game itself, which was a no-holds-barred shootout that ended, to Notre Dame fans’ eternal chagrin, with the infamous ‘Bush Push,’ when future Heisman winner Reggie Bush shoved his Heisman-winner QB Matt Leinart  into the end zone (illegally, mind you) for the win.

The 2005 BCS title game match up between Texas and USC was a godsend for the BCS: both teams were undefeated and had been clearly the best teams for the entire year, precluding all controversy. Vince Young’s performance in that game, in my opinion, was the greatest by an individual in all of sports. Nevertheless, I still maintain that the Bush Push game was the best that year, and others often agree. In what other sport can a regular season game transcend a perfectly-matched title game?

And that’s not one isolated instance. The Gators’ championship in 2006 was memorable, but even more unforgettable was the titanic showdown between undefeated rivlals Michigan and Ohio State in the last Big 10 regular season game of the year. If all they were playing for had been playoff seeding, it would have been just another regular season game. 

So yes, the BCS is unfair. But leave the fairness to the professionals, who play for money. Let college keep the regular season with games that are played for no other reason than to win, with the championship a secondary consideration.

If your team goes 11-1, winds up second in the AP poll, and makes excuses as to why they should be declared co-champion, tough luck. They should have won when it mattered, which is always.

View all comments (13) |

astorian| 1.9.09 @ 3:27PM

"They should have won when it mattered, which is always?"

Really?

Did Florida always win when it mattered? Nope, but they won the fictitious national championship anyway.

But hey, maybe you're right. Maybe college football has it right, and all the OTHER sports are doing it wrong!

Who needs March Madness? Why determine the NCAA basketball title by letting teams PLAY against each other? Instead, we could have a bunch of Basketball Bowls! Let Duke play UCLA, let North Carolina play Kansas, let Memphis play Georgetown, and then have the sportswriters vote for which team LOOKED the best!

I mean, why would you bother playing games? A sportswriter's OPINION is surely more valuable!

Chris G| 1.9.09 @ 3:42PM

Joe-
Syracuse practices in the Carrier Dome..therefore they do not practice in -20 degree weather.

bfwebster | 1.9.09 @ 4:12PM

The 2005 BCS title game match up between Texas and USC was a godsend for the BCS: both teams were undefeated and had been clearly the best teams for the entire year, precluding all controversy. Vince Young's performance in that game, in my opinion, was the greatest by an individual in all of sports.

I'm not sure I could say "in all of sports", but I'll certainly say, "In college football." That was a great game -- one of the best I've ever watched -- and an absolutely stunning individual performance by Young. It's one of the few that I would actually pay money to watch again.

I'm old enough to have watched, with my dad, the live broadcast of the Oklahoma-Nebraska football game back in 1971. They were ranked #1 and #2 at the time; the final score was 35-31, Nebraska; and IIRC there was a single 5-yard penalty in the game. It was a perfect a college football game as you could ask for. ..bruce..

Micala| 1.9.09 @ 4:14PM

This is hilarious!

http://digg.com/football/Golden_Showers_of_Praise_for_Tim_Tebow_2

J. Davis| 1.9.09 @ 4:25PM

SC-ND was a fun game that year. The Irish then went on to get the hell beat out of them by The Ohio State Univerity's mighty football team. Go Bucks!

Brian B| 1.9.09 @ 4:34PM

It seems the pros have some fairly important regular season games as do all of the other divisions of NCAA football even with their playoffs systems.
The BCS was supposed to improve on the old system but has made things even worse. Now any bowl besides the BCS game is relegated to irrelevance.
At least before there was a much better chance of a deserving team being voted in from one of two or three bowls. Now we have the worst of all three possible worlds.
Bring back the old system or give us a playoff; just get rid of the BCS.

ruth| 1.9.09 @ 4:37PM

"They should have won when it mattered, which is always." Baloney. If this is true then why didn't it apply to Florida and Oklahoma? Utah is the only team that went undefeated.

J.P. Clowes| 1.10.09 @ 11:52AM

If Division I-AA football can have a championship system that works, why can't Division I-A?

sidnee| 12.11.09 @ 12:40PM

jack wills
ugg mayfaire boots on sale

More Blog Posts by Joseph Lawler

http://spectator.org/blog/2009/01/09/a-load-of-bcs

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

The IRS Immigration Fraud Scandal

Jeffrey Lord | 6.18.13

Foreign Policy as Farce

Jed Babbin | 6.17.13

The Biggest Fool of All

Doug Bandow | 6.17.13

Can Liturgical Music Be Saved?

Patrick O'Hannigan | 6.17.13

Revenge of the Fruitcakes

Peter Hitchens | 6.17.13

Obama's Climate of Intimidation

Matthew Sheffield | 6.18.13

Obama's Unaffordable Act

Peter Ferrara | 6.19.13

Whither Suburbia?

Steven Greenhut | 6.18.13

ADVERTISEMENT