So Florida won the BCS title game last night, in a fairly boring
fashion, but Texas, USC, and especially Utah also have legitimate
claims to the championship title.
Every year, we run into this same problem. Every year, the BCS
suffers abuse from college football commentators ranging from the
oft-blustery
Michael Wilbon to the revered baseball stats guru Bill James,
who clamor for a playoff system that would determine the winner
based on performance on the field as opposed to politically
biased polls and inscrutable computer rankings.
Even the incoming president has
threatened to replace the BCS with an eight-team playoff. As
if he didn’t have better things to do.
There’s no doubt the system is unfair — Auburn in 2004 and LSU
in 2003 got shafted, big time. But it’s obvious that there is a
tradeoff between a fair bowl system and a compelling regular
season.This tradeoff became apparent in 2005, when my team, Notre
Dame, played one of the best games ever in the regular season.
First of all, realize that the system would never be fair,
playoffs or not. Is it fair that Oklahoma State gets to play in a
brand new complex donated by T. Boone Pickens while smaller
schools run on a shoe-string budget? Is it fair that Syracuse has
to convince high school students from Florida and Texas that it
will be fun for them to wake up at 5 AM to practice in -20 degree
temperatures? No, it’s not, but the reality of these differences
is what lends drama to games.
This inequality makes college football the best regular season
sport. It’s why tiny Appalachian State’s upset of giant Michigan
in 2007 was so epic. Think — if there had been a playoff system
Michigan could conceivably have snuck into the playoffs and then
won the championship after losing to Appalachian. A monumental
upset would have been reduced to a meaningless opening season
stumble that the traditional power shrugged off en route to the
playoffs.
The greatest football game I’ve ever seen wasn’t a playoff game.
It was, without a doubt, the 2005 showdown between #9 Notre Dame
and #1 USC in only the eighth week of the season. The storyline
could not have been better if it had been written in a novel. The
two traditional superpowers collided with USC riding a 27-game
win streak, and the Notre Dame program resurgent under new head
coach Charlie Weis. The forecast in South Bend was perfect, and
the Hollywood stars were all about. The anticipation crested on
the Friday night before the game with a pep rally of 50,000.
The run-up to the game was only outdone by the game itself, which
was a no-holds-barred shootout that ended, to Notre Dame fans’
eternal chagrin, with the infamous ‘Bush Push,’ when future
Heisman winner Reggie Bush shoved his Heisman-winner QB Matt
Leinart into the end zone (illegally, mind you) for the
win.
The 2005 BCS title game match up between Texas and USC was a
godsend for the BCS: both teams were undefeated and had been
clearly the best teams for the entire year, precluding all
controversy. Vince Young’s performance in that game, in my
opinion, was the greatest by an individual in all of sports.
Nevertheless, I still maintain that the Bush Push game was the
best that year, and others often agree. In what other sport can a
regular season game transcend a perfectly-matched title game?
And that’s not one isolated instance. The Gators’ championship in
2006 was memorable, but even more unforgettable was the titanic
showdown between undefeated rivlals Michigan and Ohio State in
the last Big 10 regular season game of the year. If all they were
playing for had been playoff seeding, it would have been just
another regular season game.
So yes, the BCS is unfair. But leave the fairness to the
professionals, who play for money. Let college keep the regular
season with games that are played for no other reason than to
win, with the championship a secondary consideration.
If your team goes 11-1, winds up second in the AP poll, and makes
excuses as to why they should be declared co-champion, tough
luck. They should have won when it mattered, which is always.
astorian| 1.9.09 @ 3:27PM
"They should have won when it mattered, which is always?"
Really?
Did Florida always win when it mattered? Nope, but they won the fictitious national championship anyway.
But hey, maybe you're right. Maybe college football has it right, and all the OTHER sports are doing it wrong!
Who needs March Madness? Why determine the NCAA basketball title by letting teams PLAY against each other? Instead, we could have a bunch of Basketball Bowls! Let Duke play UCLA, let North Carolina play Kansas, let Memphis play Georgetown, and then have the sportswriters vote for which team LOOKED the best!
I mean, why would you bother playing games? A sportswriter's OPINION is surely more valuable!
Chris G| 1.9.09 @ 3:42PM
Joe-
Syracuse practices in the Carrier Dome..therefore they do not practice in -20 degree weather.
bfwebster | 1.9.09 @ 4:12PM
The 2005 BCS title game match up between Texas and USC was a godsend for the BCS: both teams were undefeated and had been clearly the best teams for the entire year, precluding all controversy. Vince Young's performance in that game, in my opinion, was the greatest by an individual in all of sports.
I'm not sure I could say "in all of sports", but I'll certainly say, "In college football." That was a great game -- one of the best I've ever watched -- and an absolutely stunning individual performance by Young. It's one of the few that I would actually pay money to watch again.
I'm old enough to have watched, with my dad, the live broadcast of the Oklahoma-Nebraska football game back in 1971. They were ranked #1 and #2 at the time; the final score was 35-31, Nebraska; and IIRC there was a single 5-yard penalty in the game. It was a perfect a college football game as you could ask for. ..bruce..
Micala| 1.9.09 @ 4:14PM
This is hilarious!
http://digg.com/football/Golden_Showers_of_Praise_for_Tim_Tebow_2
J. Davis| 1.9.09 @ 4:25PM
SC-ND was a fun game that year. The Irish then went on to get the hell beat out of them by The Ohio State Univerity's mighty football team. Go Bucks!
Brian B| 1.9.09 @ 4:34PM
It seems the pros have some fairly important regular season games as do all of the other divisions of NCAA football even with their playoffs systems.
The BCS was supposed to improve on the old system but has made things even worse. Now any bowl besides the BCS game is relegated to irrelevance.
At least before there was a much better chance of a deserving team being voted in from one of two or three bowls. Now we have the worst of all three possible worlds.
Bring back the old system or give us a playoff; just get rid of the BCS.
ruth| 1.9.09 @ 4:37PM
"They should have won when it mattered, which is always." Baloney. If this is true then why didn't it apply to Florida and Oklahoma? Utah is the only team that went undefeated.
J.P. Clowes| 1.10.09 @ 11:52AM
If Division I-AA football can have a championship system that works, why can't Division I-A?
sidnee| 12.11.09 @ 12:40PM
jack wills
ugg mayfaire boots on sale