Poor Sen. Joseph Biden. Senator since the beginning of
time, it seems. Two-time presidential aspirant.
Chairman of the exalted Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
Chosen by Barack Obama to add foreign policy heft to the
Democratic ticket in the midst of the Russia-Georgia
conflict.
But then President-elect Obama chooses Hillary Clinton to be
Secretary of State. We can imagine how often she will be
calling Joe for his advice! If he’s not going to be the
administration’s foreign policy guru, then what?
Philip Terzian suggests in the Weekly Standard that
the incoming veep will go back to the usual “inconsequential”
model.
He writes:
Joseph Biden, the 66-year-old six-term senator from Delaware,
who is nothing if not a quintessential politician of his time,
is destined to be more typical than not. We know this for two
reasons. First, because the Obama apparatus has not even
bothered to say that Joe Biden will have unprecedented
responsibilities during the next four years. And second,
because the only significant story to emerge about Biden since
the election has been the fact—duly reported in the
press—that the Bidens beat the Obamas in their quest to
acquire a puppy. (For the record, Biden’s new dog is a German
shepherd.)
In fact, it may be fair to assume that Biden will be the least
consequential vice president since Alben Barkley, the amiable
71-year-old Senate fixture from Kentucky, known popularly as
the “Veep,” who was so underwhelmed by his four years’ service
in the Truman administration that he subsequently got himself
elected to the Senate again.
It is difficult to imagine either Hillary Clinton or General
James Jones actively soliciting Joe Biden’s judgment in foreign
affairs, or -Timothy Geithner and Lawrence Summers consulting
Biden on the economy. Similarly, if the neophyte Obama seeks
advice on politics or policy, is Biden destined to be the one
to set him straight, or whip the troops into line, or populate
the White House and executive branch with Biden people? Will
Rahm Emanuel be expected to “clear it” with Joe?
To ask such questions is to answer them—even without laughing.
Indeed, if there were any doubt about the insignificance of
Joseph Biden in Barack Obama’s administration, it was answered
with last week’s announcement that Biden would chair a special,
cabinet-level task force to assess the conditions of American
middle- and working-class families. (“Is the number of these
families growing?” asks the vice president-elect. “Are they
prospering?”) This is close to pure Democratic boilerplate. It
might have been more entertaining to put Biden in charge of a
White House council on change we can believe in, or appoint him
to be the logorrhea czar, but no less humiliating.
Poor Joe. But he still has a choice. He’s been reelected to
the Senate, so he still has time to change his mind. And
then President Obama could nominate someone he really wants,
instead of a campaign stopgap chosen at the one moment when his
candidacy seemed in danger. How about it, Joe?