The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT

The Spectacle Blog

Remember all that talk by the Democrats about how they were worried about the "tainted" appointment process for Barack Obama's Senate seat.  When it comes to Roland Burris, it appears that they have other considerations in mind--like holding the seat in the next election.  I am shocked, shocked ... .

Reports the Associated Press:

Democrats privately expressed concern that Burris would not be able to hold the seat in a special election that must be held in 2010. Reid has denied that political calculations are involved, but one Democratic official suggested that one potential outcome would be for Burris to be seated and pledge to retire in 2010.

Lynn Sweet makes the same point in the Chicago Sun-Times:

This brings me to why Burris will be much closer to a deal if he takes himself out of the 2010 contest. The Senate leaders want someone in the seat who has an excellent chance to win it in the next election.

Makes you proud to be an American!

About the Author

Doug Bandow is a Senior Fellow at the Cato Institute and the Senior Fellow in International Religious Persecution at the Institute on Religion and Public Policy. A former Special Assistant to President Ronald Reagan, he is author of Beyond Good Intentions: A Biblical View of Politics (Crossway).

http://spectator.org/blog/2009/01/06/roland-burris-so-much-for-prin

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

ADVERTISEMENT