It's being widely reported that the reason for the bizarre appointment of Leon Panetta to lead the CIA was his opposition to aggressive interrogation, whereas other more experienced candidates were in some way linked to the Bush administration's interrogation policies. Whatever the moral and practical arguments are against such interrogation methods, it seems awfully dangerous to apply such a rigid litmus test on that one issue, and take a risk on somebody with no intelligence background. The Sept. 11 attacks and the Iraq War arose out of major intelligence failures, demonstrating the glaring need for somebody competent in charge of the CIA who actually has real world experience in these matters, not just a Democratic Party loyalist who has a cozy relationship with the incoming president.
ruth| 1.6.09 @ 5:28PM
This guy just doesn't look like a spook to me. Aren't you supposed to look the part just a little?
1231231231| 5.28.09 @ 3:27AM
cheap wow power leveling buy wow gold cheapest wow power leveling my wow gold replica replica rolex CHEAP wow power level BUY power leveling replica rolex replica CHEAPEST power leveling MY wow power level
cheap rs gold
good BUY wow gold
replica rolex
CHEAPEST wow gold
cheap lotro gold
buy wow gold
my wow gold
cheapest wow gold
CHEAP wow gold
timberlandboots| 5.31.09 @ 9:17PM
ugg boots
Cheap Jordan shoes
timberland boots
Nike SB
Tiffany Rings
nike dunk sb
evalin| 6.14.09 @ 9:37PM
Adobe Photoshop
Windows XP
Microsoft Office
Metallic UGG Boots
Mini UGG Boots