The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

Che

Ericka Andersen goes a little further than most when she bravely asks a liberal friend what is up with the Che fetish. The friend answers:

Che was a doctor who took a trip on his bike all around SA and worked as a volunteer in a rudimentary jungle hospital in Sao Paolo, Brazil and later decided to change his life goal from being a physician to being a revolutionary in the name of the voiceless…

He is the symbol of outrageous bravery who said "Shoot, coward, you’re only going to kill a man" right before he was executed and who believed in the immortality of the revolution to save the masses of unequal citizens.

He and Castro killed many too, but they did it for an ideal, a belief that many Liberals accepted and preferred to imperialism deaths. He traveled and spent his life, truly to fight for what he believe was right, equality of the people and his image is now ubiquitous…

Equality of the people... to be shot in front of a wall for being gay? Or to starve?

The left has a morbid fascination with mass murderers, to be sure. Che, Fidel, Chavez, Lenin have all received plaudits on account of their tireless struggle for "equality," that is, "equality" of everyone else. Do all liberals feel this way? Maybe it's just a majority. But I'm surprised there's no chill effect. If Tom Cruise's latest flick, Valkyrie, were sympathetic to Hitler, and showed how Hitler was really just a courageous man who wanted to bring Germany back to its former glory, the directors would never heard the end of it (and rightly so!). Yet what was different about Hitler? He, like Che, sought to extermine those he deemed unfit. They both did so systematically. The difference is that one had a fondness for open collars and cigars, while the other one was big on Wagner.

People who speak well of Pinochet on the right usually make sure to put it in the context of how he was also a dictator and human rights violator. But the dialogue from the left rarely gets into the messy details of Che's life -- they just prefer to ignore the bad parts and portray it as all unicorn giggles and sparkles.

View all comments (9) | Leave a comment

Sean Higgins| 1.6.09 @ 11:24AM

The reason why so many on the Left -- especially the college-age crowd -- idolize Che can be seen in that iconic photo by Alberto Korda: he had movie star-level charisma. You really don't need to get any deeper than that.

In that picture he is handsome, brooding, soulful, exotic, youthful yet worldly, thoughtful yet earthy and, above all, dangerous. In short a real stud.

The fact that he was involved in real-life revolutions only makes him seem more exciting. The fact that he killed people in the name of his causes makes him even more of a bad boy.

The love exhibited for Che is not in any way an intellectual thing. It is libidinal. Anything else is just a rationalization.

tony| 1.6.09 @ 12:22PM

Sean:

I think it runs much deeper than that. Note that most people you see wearing those Che shirts are college-age kids. These are kids who have fallen under the spell of their professors, who are overwhelmingly pre-disposed to favor Marxist revolutionaries like Che.

I do think you make a point with respect to his picture, which has become iconic. But the picture only serves to enhance what has already been taught, that Che was a brave man fighting the good fight against his oppressors. In a sense, it's easy to understand why a 20 year old would fall under the spell of the legend of Che. His true history, that of a murderous thug who, when captured, whimpered like a baby and offered up his comrades in exchange for leniency, is completely ignored.

What's not easily understood or explained is the fascination with many on the left with murderous tyrants like Stalin, Castro, etc. I suspect some sort of mental disorder, but since I'm not a trained psychologist, I can only speculate. But I do believe that many on the left are so hate-filled, they are perfectly willing to overlook any behavior perpetrated by a fellow traveler if that behavior is focused on a political enemy or furthers the cause of the left.

Andrew| 1.6.09 @ 12:39PM

Really? You guys run into a lot of people on the left who like Stalin and Lenin? When did this run-in with Stalin-loving liberals supposedly happen? 1949? Or, maybe, are you guys just making stuff up?

J. Peter Freire| 1.6.09 @ 1:19PM

Andrew -- Actually, let's go back to FDR and read a few copies of the New Republic from that era. Then, let's look at such luminaries as Paul Robeson, or Alger Hiss. (Or, by extension, their fans.) Granted, I think Lenin gets more kudos these days than Stalin, but that's because Lenin used to be the black sheep, having sold out the Marxist dream once he faced the consequences of his experiment.

tony| 1.6.09 @ 1:59PM

Andrew:

I believe the word I used was fascination and I stand by it. Although I'm 43, I attended undergrad and law school in my thirties, so my experiences are reasonably fresh. I can tell you that on the typical college campus, there is a fairly widespread fascination, if not outright reverence, for communism and communist leaders.

Academia, along with the worldwide green movement, is the home for all wayward communists. This is easily understood, as academia is the one area where one's theories and beliefs are not submitted to the test of practical application.

Young men and women who do not have the benefit of experience and do not yet have fully formed minds are vulnerable to the teachings of the middle and old-aged adolescents that have gotten tenure in major universities. They poison the minds of these young people with stories of collectivist glories, while dismissing well known and documented communist atrocities as inventions of anti-intellectuals and McCarthy-ites.

In time, these young men and women graduate and go out into the world with a sub-standard education, but with a reverential attitude towards supposedly heroic figures such as Che. These are the radicalized folks you see at anti-war rallies waving the flag of Maoist China and the hammer and sickle. Or maybe they write books like "Motorcycle Diaries." Perhaps they go to Hollywood, travel to Cuba, get the royal treatment from Fidel and come back to proclaim the glory of socialism.

So, yes Andrew, I and many others encounter these types of people on a daily basis. They wear Che shirts, they dominate academia, they attend anti-war rallies, they write well known books and they infest Hollywood. Hell, they even have more than a passing familiarity with our president-elect.

Agnes D| 1.6.09 @ 2:49PM

Che was very much in vogue when I was in college (as was Fidel Castro). We wore his T shirts and hung posters of him on our dorm room walls. How wrong we were.

tony| 1.6.09 @ 5:48PM

Agnes D:

Glad to see you've overcome your education.

Quartermaster| 1.6.09 @ 6:58PM

Che tried to cut a deal to save his life. The main died a coward. But, he sure was tough when he had people taken to the wall.

sidnee| 12.11.09 @ 1:00PM

jack wills
ugg mayfaire boots on sale

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

More Blog Posts by J.P. Freire

http://spectator.org/blog/2009/01/06/che

ADVERTISEMENT

The Spectacle Blog

Gallup: Veterans Prefer Romney

W. James Antle, III | 5.28.12

Markos Moulitsas is Scum

Quin Hillyer | 5.28.12

Weekend Political Wrap-Up, Memorial Day Edition

W. James Antle, III | 5.27.12

An Honor Flight Story

TAS Staff | 5.26.12

WaPost Criticizes Romney's Lack of Rhythm

Aaron Goldstein | 5.25.12

Tom Coburn on the Debt 'Disease'

Vivien Chang | 5.25.12

SPONSORED LINKS

Special Feature

Better that we become a nation of choosers rather than beggars. Our symposium on choice from the May, 2012 issue:

A Time for Choosing

James Piereson

The Road from Serfdom

Stephen Moore and Peter Ferrara

FLASHBACK TO: 1984

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Meet the Flukes!

F. H. Buckley | 5.25.12

In Search of Muhammad

Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi | 5.25.12

The Wisconsin Turning Point

Peter Ferrara | 5.23.12

Age and Kyl

Quin Hillyer | 5.25.12

Follow Me

Jay D. Homnick | 5.25.12

How About the Record of DOE Capital?

William Tucker | 5.25.12

The Great Debate

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.24.12

Markos Moulitsas is Scum

Quin Hillyer | 5.28.12

ADVERTISEMENT