I see that Esteemed Editor Antle (it's important for writers to
shamelessly suck up to editors) has highlighted the Peter
Berkowitz piece on conservatives rallying around the
Constitution. It's an interesting argument, but another
problem with Berkowitz's thesis is including a hawkish
military policy as part of the constitutional scheme. The
original founders desired a national government strong enough to
defend America, not to remake the world. The idea that we
should be protecting prosperous and populous allies throughout
Asia and Europe and engaging in nation-building throughout the
Third World runs counter to both the original constitutional
design and sensible national security policy. Europe,
Japan, and South Korea are all able to defend themselves from
whatever threats lurk about them. For instance, South Korea
has a GDP about 40 times that of North Korea. These
so-called allies are the ultimate international freeloaders and
welfare queens, living off of American taxpayers.
Conservatives should echo George Washington and say no more
unnecessary foreign entanglements. Let's be strong enough
to smite our enemies, but let other countries take care of their
own enemies.
About the Author
Doug Bandow is a Senior Fellow at the Cato Institute and the Senior Fellow in International Religious Persecution at the Institute on Religion and Public Policy. A former Special Assistant to President Ronald Reagan, he is author of Beyond Good Intentions: A Biblical View of Politics (Crossway).