It has become commonplace for presidents to ignore the
Constitution and the law. Unfortunately, supposedly
conservative presidents don't behave much differently.
Terence Jeffrey reviews President George W. Bush's bail-out
of the auto industry. His action violates the bail-out
bill approved by Congress, which limited funds for financial
institutions.
Explains Jeffrey:
President Bush, of course, failed to get Congress to enact
legislation to provide money to auto companies.
That brings us back to the Constitution. Article 1, Section 9
reads, "No money shall be drawn from the treasury, but in
consequence of appropriations made by law."
In his commentaries on the Constitution, Justice Joseph Story
explained why the Framers gave Congress this power. "If it were
otherwise," he said, "the executive would possess an unbounded
power over the public purse of the nation; and might apply all
its monied resources at his pleasure."
President Bush may think his auto bailout spared his legacy a
bad mark. In fact, it leaves America to be haunted by the
precedent of an executive who unilaterally spends the people's
money without the legal authority required by our Constitution.
Unfortunately, when President Barack Obama follows suit on one
issue or another, there won't be much for Republicans to
say. And conservatives will need to expunge the ghost of
George W. Bush to reclaim any credibility on fiscal issues or the
rule of law.
Unfortunately, when President Barack Obama follows suit on
one issue or another, there won't be much for Republicans to
say
I wrote this to the RNC this morning:
From: xxx
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2008 11:28 AM
To: 'MemberRelations@gop.com'; 'Chairman@gop.com';
'ical@gop.com'
Subject: Regarding news reports about RNC and principles
I saw in the Washington Times that a RNC member is proposing to
admonish the Socialism that Bush brought to the country.
Please pass this resolution and also enforce the party platform
with the politicians.
We need to save our way of life and Constitution. They are being
destroyed right now. The Republican Party must radically change
course to protect the country.
Yes, the United States has taken one small step towards
Socalism.
We think that President Bush approved the financial aid for the
auto industry so as to not have 10% of the economy collapse in
the last days of his administration.
Now President Obama is going to take larger steps with his
Economic Recovery Plan, Click Link:
Obama to Push Electric Cars
VinceP1974| 12.31.08 @ 8:56PM
Here comes the fascism.. the tryannical gov is starting to boss
private business and citizens about their economic decisions.,
Bob| 1.1.09 @ 9:07AM
Perhaps the government should not have built the highway system.
Private enterprise could have done this better, right? Perhaps
the government should not have developed the space program. The
push towards becoming energy independent is a national security
and economic issue, just like interstate highways and the space
program. And yes, that should include nuclear plants and more
drilling.
You are talking about the unitary executive principle. Bush put
more signing statements on bills than any other President. That
is unconstitutional. In addition, I believe that many of his
executive orders were unconstitutional. What gets to me is that
many of you think that Bush was a good President....
VinceP1974| 1.1.09 @ 9:35AM
Bob, you purport to be a Libertarian.. your questions should
answer themselves.
Vince, I am a libertarian leaning Republican, I am not a true
libertarian, and that is obvious. The difference between the two
is that I do believe there are valid projects that the federal
government should pursue and it is a balance. On the other hand,
I'm for reforming those things that cost the most money like
social security and medicare and bringing personal responsibility
more into the equation. Yes, interstate infrastructure, the space
program, and becoming energy independent are three things I think
the federal government should engage in.
Deborah -- you should think a bit more about your cheering. Do
you really believe in a true libertarian agenda?
Groucho| 1.1.09 @ 8:12PM
Mr Bandow --
You forgot to mention that Obama finds his country so imperfect
that he pals around with terrorists.
Yes, Mr. Bandow, I still have a deep gash in my back from the
shiv President Bush shoved deeply into it on the way out the
door. Why isn't any Republican challenging the auto bailout at
the least? It does seem to me to be totally unconstitutional. The
way TARP was passed did not include such a provision, so why is
this going forward? When those in charge of making the laws and
enforcing the laws abandon their basic responsibilities, then the
country is ready for a quick downhill slide. Thanks for your
post.
William R. Barker| 1.2.09 @ 10:49AM
The bottom line is... your average politician, elected official,
appointed official, even your average judge... has little
understanding of constitutionalism as a concept and less respect
for same in terms of institutional prerogatives.
Hell - on almost any clear-cut constitutional question you'll get
four, and often five, of the Justices of the Supreme Court of the
United States to rule THE WRONG WAY!
(*SNORT*)
"Rights?" (*SNIDE CHUCKLE*)
"Responsibilities?" (*HYSTERICAL BURST OF LAUGHTER*)
The idea of fixed "rules...???" Ha! Ha! Ha! Oh... thank God I can
still laugh - even though there's little humor in the truth I
refer to.
Do I have any answers? Nope. I wish I did, but I don't. All we
can do is watch our nation descend - week after week, month after
month, year after year, decade after decade - into the European
democratic socialist welfare state model.
Sure. I expect upticks over time. We may yet see "another Reagan"
one day. But on balance, over the long haul, we're slipping and
sliding into the abyss of a failed experiment. Our democratic
Republic...? Kaput.
vincep1974| 12.31.08 @ 6:54PM
Unfortunately, when President Barack Obama follows suit on one issue or another, there won't be much for Republicans to say
I wrote this to the RNC this morning:
From: xxx
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2008 11:28 AM
To: 'MemberRelations@gop.com'; 'Chairman@gop.com'; 'ical@gop.com'
Subject: Regarding news reports about RNC and principles
I saw in the Washington Times that a RNC member is proposing to admonish the Socialism that Bush brought to the country.
Please pass this resolution and also enforce the party platform with the politicians.
We need to save our way of life and Constitution. They are being destroyed right now. The Republican Party must radically change course to protect the country.
Steve Lee| 12.31.08 @ 7:58PM
Yes, the United States has taken one small step towards Socalism.
We think that President Bush approved the financial aid for the auto industry so as to not have 10% of the economy collapse in the last days of his administration.
Now President Obama is going to take larger steps with his Economic Recovery Plan, Click Link:
Obama to Push Electric Cars
VinceP1974| 12.31.08 @ 8:56PM
Here comes the fascism.. the tryannical gov is starting to boss private business and citizens about their economic decisions.,
Bob| 1.1.09 @ 9:07AM
Perhaps the government should not have built the highway system. Private enterprise could have done this better, right? Perhaps the government should not have developed the space program. The push towards becoming energy independent is a national security and economic issue, just like interstate highways and the space program. And yes, that should include nuclear plants and more drilling.
You are talking about the unitary executive principle. Bush put more signing statements on bills than any other President. That is unconstitutional. In addition, I believe that many of his executive orders were unconstitutional. What gets to me is that many of you think that Bush was a good President....
VinceP1974| 1.1.09 @ 9:35AM
Bob, you purport to be a Libertarian.. your questions should answer themselves.
Deborah| 1.1.09 @ 10:29AM
Vince -- Hear! Hear!
Bob| 1.1.09 @ 10:47AM
Vince, I am a libertarian leaning Republican, I am not a true libertarian, and that is obvious. The difference between the two is that I do believe there are valid projects that the federal government should pursue and it is a balance. On the other hand, I'm for reforming those things that cost the most money like social security and medicare and bringing personal responsibility more into the equation. Yes, interstate infrastructure, the space program, and becoming energy independent are three things I think the federal government should engage in.
Deborah -- you should think a bit more about your cheering. Do you really believe in a true libertarian agenda?
Groucho| 1.1.09 @ 8:12PM
Mr Bandow --
You forgot to mention that Obama finds his country so imperfect that he pals around with terrorists.
When are you going to stop pussy-footing around?
Deborah| 1.2.09 @ 5:08AM
Yes, Mr. Bandow, I still have a deep gash in my back from the shiv President Bush shoved deeply into it on the way out the door. Why isn't any Republican challenging the auto bailout at the least? It does seem to me to be totally unconstitutional. The way TARP was passed did not include such a provision, so why is this going forward? When those in charge of making the laws and enforcing the laws abandon their basic responsibilities, then the country is ready for a quick downhill slide. Thanks for your post.
William R. Barker| 1.2.09 @ 10:49AM
The bottom line is... your average politician, elected official, appointed official, even your average judge... has little understanding of constitutionalism as a concept and less respect for same in terms of institutional prerogatives.
Hell - on almost any clear-cut constitutional question you'll get four, and often five, of the Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States to rule THE WRONG WAY!
(*SNORT*)
"Rights?" (*SNIDE CHUCKLE*)
"Responsibilities?" (*HYSTERICAL BURST OF LAUGHTER*)
The idea of fixed "rules...???" Ha! Ha! Ha! Oh... thank God I can still laugh - even though there's little humor in the truth I refer to.
Do I have any answers? Nope. I wish I did, but I don't. All we can do is watch our nation descend - week after week, month after month, year after year, decade after decade - into the European democratic socialist welfare state model.
Sure. I expect upticks over time. We may yet see "another Reagan" one day. But on balance, over the long haul, we're slipping and sliding into the abyss of a failed experiment. Our democratic Republic...? Kaput.
Enjoy 2009!
BILL
biniki| 8.28.09 @ 10:55PM
bikini
bikini swimwear